Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Евгений Роледер | Маркетинг на калькуляторе

@proryvmedia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,070subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001645497942
TypeChannel
Username@proryvmedia
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/proryvmedia

Growth

1,0701,0721,0717 August 2026 — 1,072 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,071 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,071 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,070 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,070–1,072 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 02:011,070-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:171,071no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:001,071-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:311,072first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 1,070 subscribers
Avg views / post
109
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 March 20267 August 2026)
Views total651
Reactions total48
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

162 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9256.8%
🔥3722.8%
127.41%
💩84.94%
👏42.47%
🤯42.47%
❤‍🔥21.23%
😍21.23%
😱10.617%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC35 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Перед тем как активно инвестировать в маркетинг, посчитайте 3 цифры Иначе разговор с маркетологом быстро превращается в: — лиды дорогие; — лиды плохие; — продаж нет; — реклама не работает. Разберем на простом примере — компания продает двери. Средний заказ: 96 000 ₽. Например, 4 двери с установкой под ключ. Допустим, экономика бизнеса позволяет направлять на привлечение клиента до 10% от выручки (посчитали маржин

👍3🔥3👏1

4 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC68 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Канал, бот или лендинг: куда вести трафик из Яндекс.Директа Не каждого человека из рекламы нужно сразу вести на форму заявки. Один клиент уже готов покупать — ему нужен подробный лендинг и возможность быстро связаться с компанией. Другому сначала нужен расчет, подбор или презентация — его рациональнее квалифицировать через бота. Третий пока сравнивает варианты и не готов обращаться — его лучше привлечь в канал и

👍4🔥21

29 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC93 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как для школы дрифта получили 309 лидов и собрали базу из 500+ потенциальных клиентов Проект — школа дрифта Корчшеринг в Новосибирске. Стоимость услуг школы — от 6 500 до 35 000 ₽. Основная задача — привлечь новых клиентов. Мы разработали связку под ключ: Яндекс.Директ → мини-лендинг → MAX или Telegram-бот → квалификация → оффер → передача контакта С помощью такой воронки мы решаем задачи: — привлечение заявок; —

👍4🔥2

27 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC137 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

MAX уже можно использовать не только «на перспективу», но и для привлечения аудитории, заявок и первых продаж. Мы протестировали площадку в 11 (уже 17) проектах: туризм, недвижимость, медицина, онлайн-образование и другие ниши. На основе практики разобрал: — какие форматы продвижения в MAX уже работают; — откуда привлекать аудиторию; — зачем использовать связку Яндекс.Директ → мини-лендинг → MAX; — каких результато

🔥6👍1

21 Jul 2026, 04:56 UTC140 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Иногда маркетинг начинается с фразы: «Нет, трафик пока не запускаем» Разбираем сейчас проект по монтажу котельных. На первом экране сайта написано: «Монтаж котельной в частном доме под ключ в Новосибирске». Я говорю заказчику: — Это не оффер. Это название услуги. То же самое написано еще у двадцати компаний. Поэтому вместо того, чтобы сразу лезть в рекламный кабинет, мы сделали карту триггеров и разобрали, на осн

👍5🔥3

15 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC178 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

584 заявки на туры на Камчатку по 582 ₽ До начала работы предыдущий подрядчик потратил 50 000 ₽ и получил несколько конверсий и ни одной заявки. Мы построили новую систему привлечения клиентов под ключ: Яндекс.Директ → мини-лендинг → MAX / Telegram-бот → квалификация → презентация туров → дожим. Результаты с 8 апреля по 15 июля: — рекламный бюджет — 339 762 ₽; — 1 720 человек запустили бота; — 1 590 из них выбрали

👍7🔥4👏1😱1

29 Jun 2026, 07:47 UTC212 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

При правильном раскладе PR может стать частью воронки. Для меня это инструмент построения дополнительных точек доверия который постепенно подводят человека к покупке. Рассказал подробнее в материале для Pressfeed.

👍5

24 Jun 2026, 14:59 UTC227 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

За несколькими сообщениями в боте могут стоять 124 блока логики: • сегментация аудитории; • выдача материалов; • прогрев; • квизы и опросы; • напоминания; • разные сценарии под разные действия пользователя; • квалификация и передача лидов. Перенесли эту воронку клиенту из другой платформы и настроили под Bothelp. Наша задача — строить и поддерживать систему привлечения клиентов, где каждый элемент работает не сам

🔥5👍1

22 Jun 2026, 07:07 UTC195 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

То, что сейчас работает в привлечении клиентов лучше, чем многие думают Последние полтора месяца практически выпал из канала. Часть этого времени провел в Казахстане — немного отдохнул, посмотрел новые города, съездил к родственникам. Но если честно, большую часть времени все равно жил в проектах. Созвоны, запуски, найм людей в команду, обсуждение гипотез и новых связок. И в какой-то момент поймал себя на мысли,

👍103🔥3

22 Jun 2026, 07:05 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «Евгений Роледер | Маркетинг на калькуляторе»

28 Apr 2026, 06:54 UTC341 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Работаем с воронкой Директ → Миниленд → Канал Разобрал поведение пользователей внутри воронки, знакомлю с цифрами. Что отслеживаем: — клик по кнопкам на минилендинге (Max / TG) — факт открытия мессенджера — подписка / старт Распределение трафика с миниленда: — 35% → Telegram — 65% → Max (Еще месяц назад перевес был в сторону ТГ) На этом этапе всё выглядит нормально. Проблема возникает дальше. Конверсия в открыти

👍75

21 Apr 2026, 07:04 UTC294 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вчера поймал себя на мысли: отчеты начали "усредняться" Результат есть. Работы есть. Инсайты есть. Но ценность для клиента — не донесена. Сделал простое решение. Собрал GPT-ассистента под одну задачу — прокачка еженедельных отчетов. Как работает: — закидываем отчет — получаем скоринг по 10-бальной шкале — разбор: что слабо, где вода, где не хватает логики — GPT задает вопросы для сбора доп информации — на выходе —

👍5🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @proryvmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 261,174 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Евгений Роледер | Маркетинг на калькуляторе” (@proryvmedia), 1,070 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proryvmedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.