Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pro Player Performance

Channel

Pro Player Performance

@proplayerperformance

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

33subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003708300339
TypeChannel
Username@proplayerperformance
Created27 January 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/proplayerperformance

Growth

333433.58 August 2026 — 34 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34 subscribers10 October 2026 — 33 subscribers8 August 202610 October 2026
3 measurements spanning 63 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Oct 2026, 01:0133-1
11 Aug 2026, 00:1634no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:0134first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 27 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍444.4%
❤333.3%
😁111.1%
🤔111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 3 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Feb 2026, 01:08 UTC56 viewsread 11 August 2026

Veesar and Dixon yet to open up and Tar Heels still up 14 at half time. Solid team all around

2 Feb 2026, 17:48 UTC61 viewsread 11 August 2026

UNC-SYRACUSE - "The Trio" leading the Tar heels on a streak? 🏀🧠 One of the clearer edges in this matchup shows up in North Carolina’s offensive balance. The trio of Caleb Wilson, Henri Veesaar, and a healthier Seth Trimble gives the Tar Heels consistent scoring from multiple spots, combining pressure inside with spacing on the perimeter. That balance also shows up on the glass, where Wilson and Veesaar regularly co…

31 Jan 2026, 20:12 UTC42 viewsread 11 August 2026

CLASSIC Wisconsin start down 11 pts first minute 🤣 . Now they are up at half . This team is wild - if they manage to find a away to be consistent first half they would be a steamroller.

31 Jan 2026, 17:20 UTC42 viewsread 11 August 2026

Is Wisconsin going to show up today? Extremely unpredictable team that has the possibility of being elite - they just need to remain consistent and tap in

31 Jan 2026, 14:50 UTC43 viewsread 11 August 2026

UNC-GT 🏀🧠 North Carolina comes into this matchup playing its most consistent basketball of the season, especially on the offensive end. The Tar Heels have topped 85 points in four of their last five games and showed real second-half control in their comeback win over Virginia, shooting efficiently and winning the rebounding battle. Georgia Tech has struggled to find reliable offense during ACC play, scoring 66 or f…

29 Jan 2026, 21:48 UTC44 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Washington- Illi - Will Illinois continue to dominate? 🧠🏀 Washington getting double digits is worth a look given how often it’s stayed competitive relative to the number. Illinois is clearly the better team, but coming off an emotional win at Purdue, this feels more like a game where control matters than separation — especially with Washington already keep…

👍1

29 Jan 2026, 15:27 UTC41 viewsread 11 August 2026

Wisconsin pulls off an impressive second half securing a win . If only they played like that both half’s - not sure what that was

29 Jan 2026, 03:28 UTC44 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Wisconsin had possibly the worst first half of any game I’ve seen in weeks ! 🤯 Losing to USC and Gophers back to back… both far less capable teams. Will they recover from this or go out with a whimper is now the question.

🤔1

29 Jan 2026, 00:44 UTC44 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

What’s the better Catholic School in your opinion? 🏀✝️

  1. SETON HALL10%
  2. XAVIER10%
  3. VILLANOVA20%
  4. ST JOHNS30%
  5. GONZAGA30%
  6. PROVIDENCE0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jan 2026, 23:16 UTC43 viewsread 11 August 2026

Seton Hall -Xavier - are the Pirates going to show up tonight? 🏀✝️ Matchups like Xavier–Seton Hall are a good example of why Catholic programs tend to outperform expectations in college basketball. These teams are usually well-coached, disciplined, and comfortable in slower, half-court games where execution matters. Seton Hall’s defensive pressure is real, but Xavier’s ability to space the floor and hit threes keeps…

28 Jan 2026, 15:46 UTC46 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Will Wisconsin bounce back after a rare loss to a mid USC team? 🧠🏀 The Minnesota–Wisconsin matchup looks increasingly lopsided when you zoom out beyond surface records. Minnesota enters this spot in a prolonged downturn, having dropped five straight games and struggling to find consistency on either end. Recent l…

❤1

28 Jan 2026, 02:10 UTC51 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

J. Lawrence misses a Game tying 3 pointer with just TWO SECONDS left on the clock ending Nebraskas undefeated season. They blew a great lead and if your a fan don’t take it out on him he still put up 20 pts. Epic game! Stay tuned 👀 for tomorrow’s NCAAB 🏀 insights. Epic Slate and one that Catch’s our eye is Wisconsin-Minn … will Wisconsin bounce back big time after a loss to a mid USC team ?

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @proplayerperformance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jan 2026, 00:44 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

What’s the better Catholic School in your opinion? 🏀✝️

  1. SETON HALL10%
  2. XAVIER10%
  3. VILLANOVA20%
  4. ST JOHNS30%
  5. GONZAGA30%
  6. PROVIDENCE0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jan 2026, 22:08 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

Is Nebraska the Indiana of College Basketball 🏀 ?

  1. YES42%
  2. NO33%
  3. THIER RUN ENDS TONIGHT25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 3 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pro Player Performance” (@proplayerperformance), 33 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proplayerperformance.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.