Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Propiy

@propiy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,058subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002076069876
TypeChannel
Username@propiy
Created28 April 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/propiy

Growth

6,0586,0976,077.56 August 2026 — 6,097 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,097 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,094 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,072 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,058 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,052–6,103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:386,058-14
9 Aug 2026, 19:316,072-22
6 Aug 2026, 20:436,094-3
6 Aug 2026, 03:226,097no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:306,097first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 28 April 2024the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

573 reactions across 4 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
25244.0%
👍11019.2%
🔥7312.7%
custom 59766073836427059536811.9%
🍾142.44%
122.09%
🏆91.57%
🕊81.40%
🤝71.22%
❤‍🔥61.05%
🥰61.05%
😍40.698%
💯20.349%
🫡20.349%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 573reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2024 to 24 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Mar 2025, 11:18 UTC≈17,000 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤝 Why risk your own capital when you can trade with ours? Propiy offers funded accounts, allowing you to focus on what you do best - trading. 🏆 Why you should choose Propiy: 🟡Start small, scale big: Begin with smaller funded accounts and work your way up to larger ones as you prove your skills. 🟡Access to institutional-grade platform: Trade on the same platform used by professional traders. 🟡Support: Benefit fro

custom 59766073836427059531918👍15🔥5

2 Mar 2025, 11:20 UTC≈23,700 views97 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💵 Your journey to a million-dollar trading account starts now! 💰 Pass our challenges and unlock funded accounts from $5,000 up to $1,000,000! ⏳ Don't miss this opportunity to level up your trading journey. ➡️Join us today! 💵 #propfirm #funding #forextrading #daytrader #tradingchallenge #fundedaccounts #financialmarkets

custom 597660738364270595349👍15🔥108🤝6🍾4🕊2🫡2

27 Feb 2025, 16:39 UTC≈21,400 views333 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

219👍51🔥2312🍾6🕊6🏆5🥰4

24 Feb 2025, 12:57 UTC≈22,300 views86 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💵No more limitations! 🕯Ready to trade with funded capital? 📈Propiy's challenges give you the chance to prove your skills and earn a funded account for Forex, Crypto, CFDs, and Indices. Start your journey today! Stay in the Market ➡️join us 💵 #trading #fundedaccounts #propiy #forex #crypto #cfd #indices

🔥35👍297❤‍🔥6🍾4🏆4🥰1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @propiy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 582,428 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Propiy” (@propiy), 6,058 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/propiy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.