@Pewzaris minimal balikin dulu lah usn, minta maaf, balikin duit buyer mu itu. Baru deh nih semua proof, semua nama baik mu ilang. Atau kamu emang gatau malu ya? 🤣
Channel
@jcaipong
@proofJcaipong
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001832638291 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @proofJcaipong |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 5 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/proofJcaipong |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 2 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 2 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 5 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 24
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
atau sepupu lo yang lain
ngga tau lo itu rosdiana
rl nya
Stop berulah ya monyet, iblis aja nih lagi minder ngeliat ulahmu
Rezaldie Aditya, minimal punya otak buat mikir ya atau udah gak ada otak? Gimana bisa kamu mau disuruh suruh sama penipu? Dan usn itu udah kesebar kalau usn itu udah kotor. Aku tau kamu gak nipu tapi clone kamu yang nipu, gitu kan maksudnya? Gimana bisa kamu wtb in 2 orang yang sama sama 1 orang tapi beda akun? Minimal kalau mau ngeles mikir.
Mealyne: Halo? Lo yang punya @minjeongp? https://t.me/RoleplayJualBeli/7742527 Rezaldie, don't wts. gapernah wtb.: Itu punya penipu Mealyne: Ada usnnya ga kak Itu kakak jual kedia apa gimana Rezaldie, don't wts. gapernah wtb.: Gua admin wtb aja jadi kena dibilang nipu juga bangsat bangsat Mealyne: Masalahnya usn aku di pm in di ch itu sampe banyak yang chat in Rezaldie, don't wts. gapernah wtb.: Username channe…
Photo, posted without a caption
Urat malu nya dimana ya? Bisa bisanya anjir gatau malu
@minjeongp balikin usn nya, ga malu bagi bagi hasil nyolong?
Jangan mau kalau ditawarin apapun yang pake nama "Rezaldie Aditya" namanya jelek, pasti store nya juga jelek, soalnya hasil nipu, mana bangga lagi @DistroV
Ternyata setelah dipantau, dia punya akun sebanyak 44 🤨 bcs subs ch nya ada 44 orang
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @proofJcaipong. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 823,722 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@proofJcaipong named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@jcaipong” (@proofJcaipong), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proofJcaipong.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.