Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @jcaipong

Channel

@jcaipong

@proofJcaipong

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001832638291
TypeChannel
Username@proofJcaipong
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 5 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/proofJcaipong

Growth

214 Aug 2026, 10:18 — 2 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 10:30 — 2 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 10:1814 Aug 2026, 10:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1–3 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 10:302no change
14 Aug 2026, 10:182first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 5 February 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
24
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

9 Feb 2023, 10:44 UTC574 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

@Pewzaris minimal balikin dulu lah usn, minta maaf, balikin duit buyer mu itu. Baru deh nih semua proof, semua nama baik mu ilang. Atau kamu emang gatau malu ya? 🤣

8 Feb 2023, 01:55 UTC524 viewsread 14 August 2026

Stop berulah ya monyet, iblis aja nih lagi minder ngeliat ulahmu

8 Feb 2023, 01:55 UTC518 viewsread 14 August 2026

Rezaldie Aditya, minimal punya otak buat mikir ya atau udah gak ada otak? Gimana bisa kamu mau disuruh suruh sama penipu? Dan usn itu udah kesebar kalau usn itu udah kotor. Aku tau kamu gak nipu tapi clone kamu yang nipu, gitu kan maksudnya? Gimana bisa kamu wtb in 2 orang yang sama sama 1 orang tapi beda akun? Minimal kalau mau ngeles mikir.

8 Feb 2023, 01:50 UTC479 viewsread 14 August 2026

Mealyne: Halo? Lo yang punya @minjeongp? https://t.me/RoleplayJualBeli/7742527 Rezaldie, don't wts. gapernah wtb.: Itu punya penipu Mealyne: Ada usnnya ga kak Itu kakak jual kedia apa gimana Rezaldie, don't wts. gapernah wtb.: Gua admin wtb aja jadi kena dibilang nipu juga bangsat bangsat Mealyne: Masalahnya usn aku di pm in di ch itu sampe banyak yang chat in Rezaldie, don't wts. gapernah wtb.: Username channe

7 Feb 2023, 12:56 UTC350 viewsread 14 August 2026

@minjeongp balikin usn nya, ga malu bagi bagi hasil nyolong?

7 Feb 2023, 02:57 UTC396 viewsread 14 August 2026

Jangan mau kalau ditawarin apapun yang pake nama "Rezaldie Aditya" namanya jelek, pasti store nya juga jelek, soalnya hasil nipu, mana bangga lagi @DistroV

7 Feb 2023, 02:51 UTC383 viewsread 14 August 2026

Ternyata setelah dipantau, dia punya akun sebanyak 44 🤨 bcs subs ch nya ada 44 orang

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @proofJcaipong. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 823,722 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@jcaipong” (@proofJcaipong), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proofJcaipong.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.