Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Anton Saburov

Channel

Anton Saburov

@promosbr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,734subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001145594693
TypeChannel
Username@promosbr
DescriptionАвторский канал Антона Сабурова. Ссылки на вебинары, обучающие видео и статьи. тут чатик: @saburov_chat Сотрудничество: @the_s_team_bot
CreatedBetween 1 May 2017 and 30 June 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/promosbr

Growth

11,73411,76111,747.57 August 2026 — 11,761 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,761 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,759 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,755 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,754 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,755 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,746 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,742 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,740 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,739 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,734 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,730–11,765 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 13:0411,734-5
16 Aug 2026, 05:5811,739-1
14 Aug 2026, 14:4711,740-2
13 Aug 2026, 02:5311,742-4
12 Aug 2026, 01:0211,746-9
11 Aug 2026, 02:2211,755+1
10 Aug 2026, 00:3111,754-1
9 Aug 2026, 00:5111,755-4
7 Aug 2026, 23:3211,759-2
7 Aug 2026, 03:3011,761no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:1811,761first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.76%
avg views ÷ 11,734 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,150
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held17 (18 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total10,311
Reactions total235
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
164
Videos
27
Links
490

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

368 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥12233.2%
11431.0%
👍9525.8%
🗿174.62%
92.45%
👏30.815%
👎20.543%
💯20.543%
❤‍🔥10.272%
🏆10.272%
😁10.272%
🙏10.272%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 368reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
51
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 17 we hold a reading for · 41%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @promosbr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC721 views20 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Самая дурацкая ситуация в международном найме — найти идеального человека, согласовать деньги, задачи, дату выхода… а потом понять, что легально оформить его почти сложнее, чем найти. Например, у вас компания в одной стране, а разработчик живет в Португалии. Открывать ради одного сотрудника местное юрлицо, нанимать бухгалтера и разбираться в трудовом законодательстве? Кажется, немного перебор. Можно оформить челов

👍12🔥53

6 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC≈1,090 views16 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Всем привет. Выложил новое видео про внедрение ИИ в бизнес. Сейчас рынок дошел до этапа, когда доступ к моделям уже почти ничего не решает. ChatGPT есть у всех, инструменты становятся дешевле, новых сервисов каждую неделю десятки. Но вот превращать ИИ в выручку, снижение затрат и более быстрые процессы пока умеют немногие. В видео разобрал: • почему внедрение ради внедрения не работает • с какого процесса лучше н

👍952

1 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC≈1,180 views15 reactionsread 17 August 2026

На этой неделе я запустил новую активность под названием «Блудняк». Что это значит? Я начал активно обсуждать новые бизнес-возможности в совершенно разных нишах. Например, сейчас обсуждаем запуск новой VC-компании. В другом проекте — создание отдельного real estate-направления на базе kone. Есть еще несколько гипотез, о которых расскажу позже. Кажется, с каждым годом я выбираю все более амбициозные и рискованные

15

30 Jul 2026, 05:39 UTC≈1,180 views30 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Если бы у меня был коммерческий директор, за это видео он бы меня прибил. Потому что я снова показываю вещи, на которых вообще-то можно было бы спокойно зарабатывать отдельно. В новом видео разобрал три сценария, которые уже использую в работе каждый день: • workflow-агент, который анализирует Meta Ads и регулярно подсказывает, что улучшить • ChatGPT Projects, где я пишу одно слово — и получаю готовые документы на

🔥149👍5👏2

29 Jul 2026, 14:53 UTC≈1,050 views24 reactions15 Starsread 17 August 2026

Кто пропустил, я как партнёр OpenAI по работе с малым и средним бизнесом имею промо на лицензии ChatGPT Business. Получите одну лицензию бесплатно для новых и старых аккаунтов. Теперь это можно сделать самостоятельно на нашей образовательной платформе: app.kone.vc. Ищите внизу слева. А уже завтра выйдет новое видео по тому как я организовал на базе ChatGPT автономную компанию.

12👍7🔥5

28 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,230 views26 reactionsread 17 August 2026

YouTube прислал мне письмо счастья: если не начну снова выпускать видео, канал отключат от монетизации. Неплохой способ вернуть человека на YouTube 🙂 Поэтому записал большое видео про то, чем сейчас занимаюсь и почему вернулся в агентский бизнес. За последний год агентства очень сильно поменялись. Раньше, чтобы вести клиентов, нужны были: • продажи • маркетолог • аналитик • аккаунт • дизайнер • техническая коман

👍188

27 Jul 2026, 12:50 UTC≈1,120 views32 reactions7 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Последний месяц я довольно глубоко работаю с русскоязычной аудиторией в США. И заметил интересную вещь. В основном это предприниматели из вполне конкретных ниш: • ремонт и строительство • сантехника • домашние сервисы • бьюти-индустрия • тракинг и логистика • другие локальные услуги Если посмотреть шире, то это довольно логично. Большая часть предпринимателей из СНГ в США строит бизнес именно в этих направлениях.

🔥21👍64😁1

25 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC≈1,250 views37 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Месяц назад я потерял сооснователя. Но, кажется, нашел партнера намного больше. Мы с Олегом проработали над KONE.VC около года. В какой-то момент стало понятно, что мы смотрим на компанию слишком по-разному. Олег хотел строить большой монолитный продукт: с нуля, вдолгую, с полноценной продуктовой разработкой. Мне же намного ближе другая модель: работать с реальными клиентами, внедрять решения под их задачи, совмещ

23👍83🔥3

20 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC≈1,490 views35 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то записал большой практический курс про внедрение ИИ в бизнес. Не про «давайте купим ChatGPT и посмотрим, что получится». А про нормальный операционный подход: • как найти самые дорогие и повторяющиеся задачи • как посчитать ROI до внедрения • почему не нужно раскатывать ИИ сразу на всю компанию • как выбрать пилотный отдел • кто должен быть power user внутри команды • как настроить ChatGPT Business Works

🔥20👍941🙏1

12 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC≈1,750 views27 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Кажется одной профессией стало меньше. Таргетологи, это я про вас.

🗿14👍73👎21

9 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC≈1,900 views28 reactions6 Starsread 17 August 2026

Айсберг инструментов digital-маркетинга в 2026 году: Под водой — то, на чем компании уже делают деньги. Я бы собрал его примерно так: Уровень 1 — Все знают • SEO • Google Ads • Meta Ads • TikTok • Email-маркетинг • Influencer Marketing Уровень 2 — Уже используют сильные команды • GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) • AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) • AI-копирайтинг • AI CRM • Reddit Marketing • Community-led Gr

🔥187👍2🗿1

8 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC≈1,620 views15 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Кажется, лучшее, что произошло с автоматизацией маркетинга за последний год — это связка MCP, рекламных кабинетов и ваших любимых AI-агентов. Честно, для меня комбинация MCP + Meta Ads + ChatGPT Business просто порвала все ожидания по эффективности. Ты больше не смотришь на отчеты раз в неделю. Теперь агент ежедневно анализирует рекламные кампании, находит проблемы, предлагает гипотезы и постепенно превращается в п

10👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @promosbr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 491,870 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Anton Saburov” (@promosbr), 11,734 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/promosbr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.