Channel
@promiseswemade
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,058subscribers
-50 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002516561130 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @promiseswemade |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/promiseswemade |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 4,058 | -33 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 4,091 | -17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 4,108 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:49 | 4,108 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (4 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,013 |
| Reactions total | 747 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,006 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5265160439200777203 | 380 | 37.8% | |
| custom 5438200806086050107 | 315 | 31.3% | |
| 👀 | 252 | 25.0% | |
| ⚡ | 59 | 5.86% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,006reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @promiseswemade. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В день рождения подруги ходили на мастер-класс от Painty🫰 Нам очень понравилось, теперь хочу снова 🙇🏼♀️ на последнем фото моя собачка 🤌🏻
👀17custom 543820080608605010716custom 526516043920077720312
Posted without readable text
custom 543820080608605010785👀45custom 526516043920077720335
promise me pinned a photo
Сегодня первым делом пошла за этой коллаборацией 🫡
custom 526516043920077720378👀42custom 543820080608605010733
Планы на последние дни июля в Москве 🌺 🌺Открытия • Онигиришная Inóni в Столярном переулке • Книжный магазин «Озеро» с кофейней на Хитровке • Петербургский ресторан Joli в ЖК Lucky • Сэндвичная «Сандо» на Тульской • Новая «Алёнка» в 8-ом павильоне «Юные Натуралисты» на ВДНХ 🌺Коллаборации • Pafos и MYTAUI • Croissant Atelier и L’occitane • Pimps и TO MY SKIN • InOut и Dr.Ceuracle 🌺Выставки и кино • Кинопоказы в D…
👀50custom 543820080608605010723custom 526516043920077720322
Такая классная коллаборация Pafos и mytaui 🩵 При покупке греческого мороженого (400р) вы получаете в подарок полноразмерный продукт от mytaui
custom 526516043920077720352custom 543820080608605010724👀18
Мой самый любимый бальзам от shikcosmetics обновил дизайн 🫰 Мое любимое липкомбо - карандаш bellagio + total repair balm TOTAL REPAIR BALM — восстанавливающий и питательный бальзам для губ, который дарит длительное ощущение комфорта, придает губам глянцевый финиш и легкий полупрозрачный оттенок. Карандаш Milano - открытие для меня. Это идеальный красный. Можно использовать как самостоятельный продукт Яркий оттен…
⚡50custom 526516043920077720330custom 543820080608605010723👀6
Сегодня тренировка в SmStreching на Чистых 🧿 Совсем пропала из жизни за 2 недели болезни, возвращаюсь 🫡
custom 526516043920077720347custom 543820080608605010718👀17⚡4
Возвращаюсь в блог с классной коллаборацией от visage.concept 🥐При покупке сливочно-кофейного желе в подарок масло для волос Nashi Argan Стоимость десерта 2490 🤩Я обожаю солнечную линейку у Nashi, поэтому не смогла пройти мимо) Сам десерт я сначала не поняла. По моим ощущениям это кофе с мороженым, в который добавили кофейное желе. Позже до меня дошло, что десерт еще можно пить 🙈🥃 кто-то пробовал это десерт, подел…
custom 543820080608605010754custom 526516043920077720333👀25⚡5
случилось сотрудничество мечты 🪽 так много работала на этой неделе, что решила себя порадовать! очень рада этой покупке, теперь планирую работать ещё больше :) 🤍покупала тут @bondar.kst
custom 526516043920077720371custom 543820080608605010739👀32
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @promiseswemade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“promise me” (@promiseswemade), 4,058 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/promiseswemade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.