Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Про AI

@promidgpt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,912subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001847713296
TypeChannel
Username@promidgpt
Created18 March 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/promidgpt

Growth

7,9127,9287,9207 August 2026 — 7,928 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,928 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,925 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,915 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,912 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,910–7,930 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 04:577,912-3
10 Aug 2026, 20:037,915-10
7 Aug 2026, 23:267,925-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:007,928no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:507,928first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 7,912 subscribers
Avg views / post
944
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held14 (5 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total6,609
Reactions total69
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 12s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

146 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4430.1%
🤯2919.9%
❤‍🔥2718.5%
😁2517.1%
👏128.22%
32.05%
😍32.05%
🥰32.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC582 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👨‍⚖️ Московский суд отказался признавать ИИ-картинки объектом авторского права. Автор переработал «Мону Лизу» и Статую Свободы с помощью нейросети, но другой предприниматель начал продавать мерч с этими изображениями без разрешения. Суд решил, что такой результат — это скорее техническая обработка, чем творческая работа. А идея с бокалом вместо факела и вовсе не считается уникальной. Похоже, вопрос авторских прав

🔥6🤯3❤‍🔥2😁1

4 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC725 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Google выпустила Lyria 3.5 — и это один из самых сильных конкурентов Suno на сегодняшний день. 🎵 Модель стала доступна в AI Studio и Vertex AI, а главное нововведение — возможность генерировать музыку по частям, сохраняя единый стиль и структуру трека. По качеству английских треков Lyria 3.5 звучит очень достойно: чистый вокал и минимум характерных ИИ-артефактов. С русским пока все еще есть проблемы — ударения мест

🔥3❤‍🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC706 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ИИ окончательно стал частью работы Java-разработчиков. Согласно исследованию State of Java Insights 2026 от VK и JUG Ru Group, нейросети уже используют 95% специалистов, а каждый второй — ежедневно. При этом сам стек почти не изменился: Spring Boot, PostgreSQL, Kafka, Maven и Gradle по-прежнему остаются основой большинства Java-проектов. Похоже, ИИ не заменил разработчиков — он просто стал еще одним инструментом в

3👏3🤯2❤‍🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC766 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Siri с ИИ может стать платной. 👀 Тим Кук намекнул, что в будущем продвинутую версию ассистента могут включить в более дорогие тарифы iCloud+. Причина проста — обслуживание ИИ обходится слишком дорого. Осталось только дождаться, когда Siri начнут пользоваться так же активно, как об этом говорят в Apple. Про AI

😁7🔥3❤‍🔥2🤯1

25 Jul 2026, 07:47 UTC≈1,160 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Anthropic представила Claude Opus 5. 🔥 Главный акцент — эффективность. Новая модель потребляет почти вдвое меньше токенов, чем Fable 5, а в ряде популярных бенчмарков, включая DeepSWE, AutomationBench и FrontierBench, обходит GPT-5.6 Sol. Модель уже доступна. Цена не изменилась — $5 (~380 ₽) за миллион входных токенов. Про AI

🔥4❤‍🔥3

21 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,380 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🏋️Тренеры в зале напряглись: стартап BodyPark выпустил камеру ATOM, которая следит за техникой во время тренировки. Она распознает движения по 34 точкам, считает повторения, отслеживает траекторию грифа и голосом подсказывает, где вы ошибаетесь. А еще ИИ сам собирает персональные тренировки под силу, HIIT, пилатес и восстановление. Цена вопроса — $219, или около 17 200 рублей. Про AI

❤‍🔥4🔥3🥰1😁1

21 Jul 2026, 07:46 UTC≈1,290 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Первая игра, полностью созданная с помощью ИИ, появилась в Steam. 🎮 Автор без опыта в геймдеве собрал Cook The Dungeon всего за три недели. Код писали GPT-5.5, Opus 4.8 и Grok 4.5, графику полностью сгенерировал ChatGPT. И самое неожиданное — выглядит это как полноценная инди-игра, а не очередной нейрослоп. Похоже, порог входа в геймдев только что стал значительно ниже. Про AI

🔥12🤯2

13 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC≈1,480 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🔥Моушн в ChatGPT 5.6 вышел на новый уровень. На видео — результат работы новой модели. Она умеет сама собирать анимированные презентации, демки приложений и питч-деки. Правда, на один ролик уходит около двух часов автономной работы. Самое забавное — по пути модель 13 раз критиковала собственный результат и только с 13-й попытки решила, что получилось достойно. Теперь бы такую точность в Seedance, где текст до сих

🔥8❤‍🔥4

11 Jul 2026, 16:42 UTC≈1,270 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🤖 Гуманоид NEO прокачал мелкую моторику почти до человеческого уровня. Теперь он собирает Lego, ест чипсы, держит бокал, играет в приставку и ловко двигает пальцами. Осталось научить его листать мемы и спорить в комментариях. Про AI

❤‍🔥4🤯2🥰2

11 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC≈1,010 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ИИ уже спорит сам с собой. 🤯 Разраба забанил OpenAI. Тогда он загрузил письмо о блокировке в Codex, который сам нашел причину, написал апелляцию и отправил ее. Через несколько минут другой ИИ OpenAI рассмотрел обращение и снял бан. Человека забанил ИИ, защитил ИИ и оправдал тоже ИИ. Мы тут уже почти лишние. Про AI

😁6🤯3

7 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC≈1,320 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Внутри Claude нашли что-то похожее на «мысли» 🤯 Anthropic обнаружила J-space - скрытое пространство нейронных активаций, которое никто специально не проектировал. Оно сформировалось само. Что заметили: • Claude может увидеть баг, даже если его не спрашивали - внутри появляется сигнал «ERROR». • В тестах на шантаж модель сначала помечала сценарий как «fake» и «fictional». То есть Claude понимала, что ситуация выдум

🤯7❤‍🔥5🔥2

7 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,130 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Китай может закрыть свои лучшие ИИ-модели от всего мира 👀 По данным СМИ, власти обсуждают с Alibaba, ByteDance и другими лидерами рынка ограничения на экспорт передовых нейросетей - включая open-source модели и даже те, которые еще не вышли Если решение примут, мир может лишиться доступа к самым мощным китайским ИИ Про AI

🤯6🔥3😁3

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @promidgpt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 540,626 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Про AI” (@promidgpt), 7,912 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/promidgpt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.