Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PM 🚇️🚀⚠️

Channel

PM 🚇️🚀⚠️

@prometro_air

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,267subscribers

-72 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002088899223
TypeChannel
Username@prometro_air
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/prometro_air

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,2677,3397,3037 August 2026 — 7,339 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,339 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,336 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,332 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,318 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,315 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,311 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,308 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,302 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,292 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,283 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,273 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,267 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,256–7,350 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 05:187,267-6
11 Sept 2026, 19:407,273-10
7 Sept 2026, 06:377,283-9
2 Sept 2026, 12:347,292-10
30 Aug 2026, 22:487,302-6
27 Aug 2026, 12:437,308-3
24 Aug 2026, 21:427,311-4
21 Aug 2026, 00:397,315-3
17 Aug 2026, 16:067,318-14
14 Aug 2026, 03:267,332-4
11 Aug 2026, 01:177,336-3
8 Aug 2026, 04:537,339no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:027,339first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.76%
avg views ÷ 7,267 subscribers
Avg views / post
273
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held49 (6 August 202620 August 2026)
Views total3,008
Reactions total157
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 56s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

948 reactions across 49 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
48150.7%
👍35937.9%
👎252.64%
🔥161.69%
😁161.69%
😨141.48%
🤬90.949%
🥰90.949%
🤩80.844%
🏆60.633%
🤯50.527%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 948 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 49 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prometro_air. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC131 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Двухосный трамвай серии "Х" восстановленный в 1998 году на территории музея ЕМУП "ТТУ", Екатеринбург ЕкбТрамФан

6👍5

Signed □травыч

20 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC247 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Табличка "БЕРЕГИСЬ ТРАМВАЯ!" у "Южного" трамвайного депо, и вид на это депо ЕкбТрамФан

10👍4

Signed □травыч

20 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC289 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

71-639 "Кастор" на ост. "Волгоградская ул." по маршруту №16 до конечной ост. "Ак. Парина" из окна Tatra T3, Екатеринбург ЕкбТрамФан

10👍3🏆1

Signed □травыч

19 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC429 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

ЭВС1-06 "Сапсан" следует через станцию Любань Кот Яра

14👍3👎1

Signed □травыч

19 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC458 views17 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Фотографии с поездами в Республике Карелия! 1. 1 путь станции Сортавала, паровоз Л-2331. 2. 30 путь станции Сортавала, тепловоз ТЭП70БС-323 3. Станция Сортавала-Центр. Железнодорожник

12👍5

Signed □травыч

19 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC396 views23 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

ЭС2Г 126 "Ласточка" Рейс Санкт-Петербург - Гатчина Варшавская. Перегон Броневая - Лигово. Платформа Ленинский проспект Кот Яра

20👍2👎1

Signed □травыч

19 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC384 views17 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Красивые виды из окна электропоезда ЭД4М-0211/0192 на БК МЖД (БМО) Artem Tsyplakov

👍132👎1🤩1

Signed □травыч

19 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC268 views14 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

В начале видео ошибка: первый в России поезд с граффити был в Москве, и назывался «На пути к искусству» street_spray_art

13👍1

19 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC206 views14 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @pro_metroPhoto

Вот наглядный пример, когда Графити можно делать с пользой и очень красиво и главное законно! Петербургский метрополитен реализовал смелый и очень необычный проект - пригласил художников и дал им целый поезд для творчества! 😳 Художники отработали от души и на отлично! На 2 линии этот Сказочный поезд уже работает! Если кто поймает его - пришлите фото в комменты 😊

13👍1

18 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC49 views6 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

ЭД4М-0133 сообщением Посёлок - Санкт-Петербург (Витебский вокзал) Станция Купчино Transport Pro

👍32🔥1

Signed □травыч

18 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC151 views9 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Реконструкция платформы «Чертаново» Павелецкого направления Московской железной дороги Artem Tsyplakov

8👍1

Signed □травыч

17 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC406 views23 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Станция «Москва-Пассажирская-Киевская» и электропоезда ЭП2Д-0006, ЭП2Д-0083 «РЭКС» и ЭП2ДМ-0283 Artem Tsyplakov

14👍7👎1🤯1

Signed □травыч

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @prometro_air. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Наша колея 1520
@NashaKoleya · 49,819
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PM 🚇️🚀⚠️” (@prometro_air), 7,267 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prometro_air.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.