Channel
@prom_crypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
449subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001907349105 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prom_crypto |
| Description | Денежные мувы, темки и путь с нуля до хайбанка 💵 💬 Наш чатик -> https://t.me/+q1QOUDKQzLAxMzYy 📞Админ канала/по вопросам - @fazeadmin |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 December 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prom_crypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 449 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:40 | 449 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 10 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
105 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 29 | 27.6% | |
| ❤ | 28 | 26.7% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 17.1% | |
| 🐳 | 16 | 15.2% | |
| 🤝 | 10 | 9.52% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.90% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2025 to 26 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prom_crypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 January 2025 to 26 February 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
фскс промочка,8$ на старый аккаунт Через 10 минут стартует новое промо с токеном kaito на okx где 50к старичков заберут по 4 kaito (8$) и 50к новичков по 6 kaito, промо фскс, награды дают сразу https://www.okx.com/ua/campaigns/kaito-trade-and-earn
🔥5❤2🤝1
Signed faze
выйдет +-150 на акк по курсу, можете сразу хеджить награды курс запампили, мне удалось даже захеджить с разницей +20$ в свою пользу
❤7🔥1
Signed faze
фастом закидываем монетки xoxo в пул 600%апр на 14 дней откупаем спот и хеджим на мекс фьючах, спасибо за инфу
🐳3
Signed faze
фскс промо 3.5$/акк для старых от OKX по условиям деп 100$ + торги 300$, награды приходят сразу, мб есть смысл прогнать ферму кому скучно https://www.okx.com/ua/campaigns/uxlink-trade-and-earn?channelid=ACE519965
🔥2
Signed faze
токены пришли на мекс, можете стаканить, у меня вышло +1300$, гц кто брал
🔥1
Signed faze
откупил $BERA, щарющие ребята говорят что смарт я же просто повторил, особо не углублялся и не изучал но беру прям все долго ждали, купил я выходит по капе примерно 600кк, видел что проект сравнивают с sui & move у которых капа на листинге была в пару тройку раз так больше может смарт может нет, но соскучился за премаркет движем, листинг уже завтра, даже на бинансе мб и корейские биржи подтянутся как было с муве, ди…
❤3👍1
Signed faze
Как окупить аккаунт окх сразу же и получить 50-70$ сверху ? Для начала нам нужен аккаунт на бирже OKX, зарегать который вы можете по моей ссылке, далее делаете/покупаете кус, я беру снг ⌨️ 1️⃣Сегодня вышло промо с токеном AIXBT где новые аккаунты могут получить 5 + 10 AIXBT (10$) за депозит 100$ + обьем 300$ в токене на споте, награды приходят сразу! 2️⃣Далее имеем второе промо с токеном TRUMP где новые аккаунты д…
👍2🤝2🐳1🔥1
Signed faze
короче слил почти все, профит 2100$ + 600 токенов не могу заклеймить, клеймил с пк, продавал на стон фи со слипаджем >10, слипедж кст норм съел доволен или не хз, больше да чем нет
🔥3
Signed faze
px - контора сделали все максимально по конченому, все легло, как клейм так и свапалки
🤝5💔2❤1
Signed faze
https://dexscreener.com/ton/eqaokclrovimcaxnnp4me7x9u1eeojotrebpbk-uhptlzbce лежит алмаз не дать не взять
😁2
Signed faze
Клеймим $PX сегодня 🙂 Меньше чем через полтора часа станет доступен клейм токенов px через https://t.me/tokentable_bot/pixel_earn, кстати вроде бы всем отображает на 10% токенов больше при клейме, по цене не знаю что ожидать, листинг только на дексах, многие тон дегены почему то буллиш по этому, я же ничего не могу сказать цену хз какую ждать, настроение не очень судя по тому как решили сделать, но ладно ждем листи…
👍2🔥1
Signed faze
sol ath 268$ 😇
🔥4❤1🐳1
Signed faze
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @prom_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 457,775 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PromCrypto” (@prom_crypto), 449 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prom_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.