Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пролактиновая бомба 🧨

Channel

Пролактиновая бомба 🧨

@prolabomba

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,298subscribers

-37 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001919084473
TypeChannel
Username@prolabomba
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/prolabomba

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2981,3351,316.57 August 2026 — 1,335 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,335 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,333 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,331 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,330 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,327 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,323 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,320 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,318 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,316 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,313 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,308 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,304 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,298 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,292–1,341 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 10:011,298-6
14 Sept 2026, 13:381,304-4
10 Sept 2026, 23:571,308-5
2 Sept 2026, 03:281,313-3
30 Aug 2026, 08:471,316-2
27 Aug 2026, 13:171,318-2
24 Aug 2026, 23:371,320-3
21 Aug 2026, 09:371,323-4
17 Aug 2026, 23:321,327-3
14 Aug 2026, 17:341,330-1
11 Aug 2026, 14:451,331-2
8 Aug 2026, 08:511,333-2
7 Aug 2026, 11:321,335no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:211,335first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

660 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23435.5%
🔥18928.6%
👍6810.3%
custom 5211053712516074842538.03%
🤣507.58%
🥰466.97%
🍾111.67%
💯60.909%
😱30.455%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 660 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2025 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 18 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prolabomba. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 November 2025 to 21 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.56%
1 of 18 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
196
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
531
over 17 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFJcxE4R121 June 202621 June 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2025 to 21 June 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

21 Jun 2026, 17:38 UTC196 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFJcxE4RPhoto

Почему одни дети начинают говорить на языке уже через несколько занятий, а другие годами учат правила и стесняются отвечать? Часто дело не в способностях ребёнка, а в том, насколько ему подходит преподаватель, формат и темы занятий. Мы сделали короткий тест для родителей. За 1 минуту вы узнаете: • что сейчас мешает ребёнку заговорить увереннее; • как повысить интерес к языку; • какой формат обучения подойдёт именн

10🔥5👍4🥰1

19 Apr 2026, 18:58 UTC422 views37 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

Танцуем)

🔥2210custom 52110537125160748425

12 Apr 2026, 21:30 UTC489 views36 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 Дружищи, я уже не буду вести канал так, как он должен выглядеть. Но. Мы с Жекой летим в свадебное путешествие спустя 6 лет, и я бы не отписывалась от меня)) Есть идеи куда?

🔥1811custom 52110537125160748427

11 Jan 2026, 00:22 UTC949 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Занозонька 😂

20custom 521105371251607484210🔥9

5 Jan 2026, 00:41 UTC952 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всё бы ничего Только мы 2 тигра в его тыкдымской жизни))) Я мечтала о принце на белом коне... Конь точно есть. Знатный, породистый, лучший. А вы в год кого родились?

12🔥10🥰8👍3

3 Jan 2026, 07:35 UTC756 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сами вы не существуете! 🥲 Рассказывать детям правду о Деде Морозе лучше всего в возрасте 8–10 лет До семи лет вера в сказку играет важную роль: она развивает воображение и помогает ребёнку чувствовать мир безопасным и добрым. Ближе к восьми–десяти годам у детей формируется критическое мышление, и они сами начинают сомневаться и задавать вопросы. Педагоги советуют не рушить иллюзию резко, а спокойно и честно погов

👍25🔥147🥰2custom 52110537125160748422

31 Dec 2025, 20:47 UTC536 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Девахи, изда, у меня ДАЙСОН!!! Хвастайтесь своими дедморозами)) 🤩

16🔥12👍4🥰1

31 Dec 2025, 17:04 UTC620 views32 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

Коротко С наступающим, дорогие!

17🔥11custom 52110537125160748424

29 Dec 2025, 14:36 UTC423 views41 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Первый утренник 🐈‍⬛ Мать в бахилах и в прыжке. К этому жизнь меня не готовила, конечно, но как по мне, Брюс Уиллис прыгал так высоко и ровненько лет тридцать назад в Крепком Орешке. Ну да ладно 🥰 Девчонки, разревелась как сопля, это так мило! Одна мамаша за стишок так переживала, что поддерживала детей как Губерниев сборную! А ещё познакомилась с мамой нашей лучшей подружки, мама - норм, милая, одобряю. И подруг

17🥰12🔥11🤣1

26 Dec 2025, 07:05 UTC405 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Доброе корпоративашное 😂 У меня сегодня первый корпоратив с додекретных времён. Это почти как, земля до начала времени. Если новостные ленты взорвутся от того, что в Ялте какая-то барышня ограбила маяк, например, то я ничего не скажу. Но будут намёки. А вы уже откорпоративились? Как оно?

🤣1312🔥9custom 52110537125160748424

23 Dec 2025, 07:04 UTC462 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Репортаж из пыточной 😭 Вобщем, Кира подсела на Бременских музыкантов. Плотно так, жёстко. Чтобы внести максимальную ясность - уже 4 недели у нас "ах ты бедная моя трубодурочка" на репите. Это больно! Только от мотива "ничего на свете лучше неееетууу" начинает немного мутить, ну правда. И перебить сие действо ни Русалочка, ни Золушка не в силах, даже Чебурашка с НуПогодёй нервно курят в сторонке. И у меня всплывае

🔥136custom 52110537125160748426🤣2💯1

20 Dec 2025, 18:45 UTC451 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Настроение? Новогоднее! А как у вас, все росу сраную купили? Я вот ничего не успеваю, и подарки упаковывать надо, и ёлку нарядить, и игрушки найти вообще-то... Вы готовы?

🔥2115🍾11🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @prolabomba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пролактиновая бомба 🧨” (@prolabomba), 1,298 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prolabomba.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.