Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Прокуратура ТАТАРСТАНА

Channel

Прокуратура ТАТАРСТАНА

@prokrt

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

7,593subscribers

-124 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001311866024
TypeChannel
Username@prokrt
DescriptionОфициальный канал прокуратуры Республики Татарстан в Telegram Обратиться в прокуратуру Татарстана https://epp.genproc.gov.ru/web/proc_16/internet-reception/personal-receptionrequest
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/prokrt

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.

Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Kazan_bezopasno7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.009.0 hoursthis entry (7–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 141 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,5877,7177,6526 August 2026 — 7,717 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,713 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,701 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,699 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,693 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,694 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,688 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,674 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,673 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,672 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,674 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,660 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,664 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,654 subscribers29 September 2026 — 7,623 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,604 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,623 subscribers16 October 2026 — 7,627 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,618 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,613 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,608 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,605 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,598 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,597 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,587 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,593 subscribers7,5936 August 20269 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net -124. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,568–7,737 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 07:077,593+6
6 Nov 2026, 04:017,587-10
2 Nov 2026, 17:197,597-1
31 Oct 2026, 00:557,598-7
28 Oct 2026, 10:177,605-3
25 Oct 2026, 07:417,608-5
21 Oct 2026, 21:317,613-5
18 Oct 2026, 22:057,618-9
16 Oct 2026, 05:407,627+4
12 Oct 2026, 22:387,623+19
6 Oct 2026, 10:207,604-19
29 Sept 2026, 16:167,623-31
19 Sept 2026, 16:207,654-10
15 Sept 2026, 08:397,664+4
11 Sept 2026, 14:597,660-14
7 Sept 2026, 00:187,674+2
2 Sept 2026, 05:137,672-1
30 Aug 2026, 13:077,673-1
27 Aug 2026, 10:437,674-14
24 Aug 2026, 08:537,688first reading

Engagement

146 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.98%
avg views ÷ 7,593 subscribers
Avg views / post
454
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.894%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 146 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held146 (3 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total23,606
Reactions total211
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 02:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,140
Videos
≈1,630
Links
≈4,070

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
14m 26s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 56 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

682 reactions across 144 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍15022.0%
⚡10615.5%
👌9513.9%
❤8412.3%
💯487.04%
😱314.55%
👏243.52%
😨233.37%
🔥192.79%
❤‍🔥162.35%
🙏142.05%
🤯142.05%
😐101.47%
custom 528278563636380709981.17%
🕊81.17%
🙈71.03%
😎60.88%
😢50.733%
🏆30.44%
😭30.44%
5 further kinds81.17%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 144 of the 146 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 682 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 146 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 14 of 54 posts held from the last 30 days (25.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 14:30 UTC216 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⛺ Приземлили «Воздух» В поселке Опушка два купольных дома (они же база отдыха «Воздух») на участке ИЖС оказались вне закона - зона застройки разрешает только частные коттеджи. Налоги уплачены, ИП оформлено, но правила землепользования нарушены - строить базу отдыха на этой земле нельзя. По постановлению прокуратуры Тукаевского района владелец участка оштрафован на 10 тыс. рублей по ст. 8.8 КоАП РФ. #земля #Тукаевс…

👍3👌1🤔1

10 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC231 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

📌 Прокуратура Вахитовского района Казани выявила нарушения трудового законодательства в деятельности местной фирмы. Участник СВО работал без трудового договора и получил травму средней тяжести на производстве. Суд удовлетворил иск прокуратуры о компенсации морального вреда в размере 600 тыс. рублей. #иск #Вахитовская ⭐️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️ Подписаться на Прокуратуру Татарстана в ТГ / Мах

❤4⚡2👍2

10 Nov 2026, 12:57 UTC260 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

▶️Прокуратура Татарстана утвердила обвинительное заключение в отношении 55-летнего врача-остеопата. Она обвиняется в причинении смерти по неосторожности (ч. 2 ст. 109 УК РФ). В январе 2025 года, работая в частной клинике, она оказывала платные услуги мальчику 2023 года рождения без должной оценки его здоровья и консультации с лечащим врачом. В ходе процедур женщина нанесла ребенку травму, от которой он скончался в то…

😱2🕊1😢1

10 Nov 2026, 12:18 UTC271 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⚖️ 8,5 лет колонии общего режима — такой приговор вынес суд 54-летней жительнице Казани за попытку торговать смертью через интернет. Общий вес изъятого у нее наркотика составил почти полкилограмма. В апреле 2026 года она заложила очередную партию в Кировском районе, сфотографировала тайник для отчета, но была задержана. Позиция прокуратуры Кировского района Казани — максимально строгая. Суд с ней согласился. #наркот…

⚡2👍1😱1

10 Nov 2026, 08:49 UTC604 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🖋Пост-подсказка: «просто покататься» закончилось переломами В Бугульме 39-летнюю маму признали виновной в вовлечении ребенка в действия, опасные для жизни (ч. 1 ст. 151.2 УК РФ). Купленный ею питбайк привел 13-летнего сына в травмпункт с переломами руки и челюсти. Бугульминская городская прокуратура доказала, что женщина ВИНОВНА, и суд назначил ей штраф в 60 тыс. рублей, а сам питбайк конфискован. 🚫 Питбайк — это н…

⚡2❤1❤‍🔥1

10 Nov 2026, 06:27 UTC369 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Заместитель прокурора республики Владимир Посохов проведет выездной прием граждан в Лениногорске Во вторник, 17 ноября 2026 года, заместитель прокурора Республики Татарстан Владимир Посохов проведет выездной прием граждан в городе Лениногорск. Прием состоится в здании Лениногорской городской прокуратуры по адресу: РТ, г. Лениногорск, ул. Шашина, д. 3, с 11:00 до 13:00. 📞Предварительная запись по телефону: 8(855…

⚡1👍1💯1

9 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC370 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🖥 Переходите по ссылке и читайте больше и подробнее на сайте прокуратуры Татарстана. #новости_на_сайте ⭐️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️ Подписаться на Прокуратуру Татарстана в ТГ / Мах

❤2⚡1👍1

9 Nov 2026, 14:40 UTC385 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

👮‍♂️🔎 В прокуратуре Татарстана под председательством первого заместителя прокурора республики Александра Чеховского прошло заседание межведомственной рабочей группы, посвященное противодействию правонарушениям при реализации нацпроектов. В мероприятии участвовали представители министерств, ведомств, контрольно-надзорных и правоохранительных органов. Были обсуждены вопросы реализации нацпроектов в 2026 году, включая к…

❤2⚡1💯1

9 Nov 2026, 13:05 UTC376 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🛋️ Мебель, которой не было В Зеленодольске вынесен приговор по делу о мошенничестве. 46-летний местный житель похитил 358 тыс. рублей у трех человек под предлогом поставки мебели. С учетом позиции Зеленодольской городской прокуратуры суд назначил виновному 1 год 6 месяцев лишения свободы условно. #приговор #Зеленодольск ⭐️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️ Подписаться на Прокуратуру Татарстана в ТГ / Мах

⚡1👌1💯1😐1

9 Nov 2026, 12:30 UTC364 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⚡️Нанесла смертельные травмы сожителю Елабужская городская прокуратура утвердила обвинительное заключение в отношении 45-летней местной жительницы по ч. 1 ст. 105 УК РФ (убийство). 20 августа 2026 года женщина, будучи в нетрезвом виде, в ходе ссоры нанесла сожителю удар ножом в грудную клетку. Мужчина скончался. Дело направлено в суд. #ОЗ #Елабуга ⭐️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️️ Подписаться на Прокура…

🤨1😱1🙈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 146 posts we hold for @prokrt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

НеКазань
@nokazan · 18,944
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 4 October 2026
Салмачи - Куюки | Онлайн
@salmachi_online · 21,488
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 23 September 2026
Еду в Татарстан
@eduvtatarstan · 37,548
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Татарстан News
@ttrstnnws · 40,004
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Подслушано Казань
@kazan_podslushano · 34,474
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026
ВТП | В Татарстане Поймут
@vkazani · 49,130
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 August 2026
ТАТМЕДИА | Новости Казани и Татарстана
@tatmediaofficial · 45,864
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
Tatarstan Republic | Казань
@tatarstan_republic · 55,166
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Жесть Казани
@SHOCKkzn · 80,995
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Инфо-Татар | Казань | Татарстан
@info_tatar · 37,742
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
ТатарстанДа!
@tatarstan_da · 34,893
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 September 2026
БО | Новости
@gazetabo · 33,727
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
Рустам Минниханов
@rustamminnikhanov · 66,851
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Татарстан, Казань и все все все
@city16kazan · 25,328
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
Новости Казани и Татарстана
@kazan_chat0 · 21,011
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 September 2026
Подслушано | Казань и Республика Татарстан
@kzn_xz · 22,440
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
ПОДСЛУШАНО НИЖНЕКАМСК 🧿
@podslunk · 21,235
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 9 September 2026
Только Казань
@kazan_only · 41,440
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
Казань с огоньком
@kazantop1 · 52,938
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
Inkazan | Казань и Татарстан
@inkazanischa · 29,271
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
БИЗНЕС Online
@businessgazeta · 51,341
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026
ПОДСЛУШАНО КАЗАНЬ🧿
@podslukzn · 45,225
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
Mash Iptash
@mash_iptash · 69,689
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
КАЗАНЬ СЕГОДНЯ
@kazany · 46,371
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q123149559 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelRepublic of Tatarstan Prosecutor's Office
DescriptionProsecution office of the Russian Federation subject region
YouTubeUCp2aY_7qee_-zu9EEouhZ6w
Official sitehttps://epp.genproc.gov.ru/web/proc_16

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Академическая (станция метро, Казань) (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…ссылка}}. 11 февраля 2025 года погиб рабочий{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/prokrt/4516 |title=Telegram: Contact @prokrt<!-- Заголовок добавлен ботом…”
read 1 November 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Прокуратура ТАТАРСТАНА” (@prokrt), 7,593 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prokrt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.