Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пройдёмся по талии 18+

Channel

Пройдёмся по талии 18+

@proidemsyapotalii

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,661subscribers

+401 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001722938162
TypeChannel
Username@proidemsyapotalii
Created2 September 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/proidemsyapotalii

Growth

5,2605,6615,460.56 August 2026 — 5,260 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,260 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,295 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,432 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,546 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,661 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +401. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,200–5,721 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:075,661+115
12 Aug 2026, 13:455,546+114
9 Aug 2026, 05:125,432+137
6 Aug 2026, 12:425,295+35
6 Aug 2026, 04:165,260no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:075,260first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.9%
avg views ÷ 5,661 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,200
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held27 (20 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total59,421
Reactions total2,906
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,683 reactions across 25 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁60622.6%
❤‍🔥48117.9%
🔥47417.7%
💯41215.4%
💔1435.33%
👏1244.62%
🤣682.53%
🥰682.53%
672.50%
🌚421.57%
🍓391.45%
👎240.895%
🕊240.895%
😢200.745%
🤮200.745%
👍160.596%
🤔160.596%
100.373%
💋90.335%
🌭70.261%
4 further kinds130.485%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,906reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
270
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 27 we hold a reading for · 81%
Most on one post
120
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @proidemsyapotalii. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC761 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😁21🍓13🔥9🕊7❤‍🔥5👎4🤮2🐳1

Signed timofeos

10 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC≈1,140 views98 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

друг пришёл на работу устраиваться. hr ему говорит: -На какую зарплату рассчитывайте? -Сто тысяч, - отвечает он. -Не, у нас на этой вакансии только 40 тысяч зп. -Согласен.

😁52🤣20🔥15😢4👏3👎1🤔1🤮1

Signed timofeos

9 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,290 views125 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

писатели и поэты были фудкортницами ещё до того, как это стало мейнстримом. мы приходим, покупаем самый дешёвый кофе, достаём половинку твикса и цедим эту хуйню, пока не заболит спина. стаканчик мы не выбрасываем, хотя он давно пустой и холодный, а то вдруг подумают, что мы просто занимаем чьё-то место. я давно на этой волне, а никто ни разу так и не назвал меня тапочкинКС

😁69❤‍🔥26🔥23💔4🌚1👎1🤮1

Signed timofeos

8 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC≈1,460 views87 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

захожу на Одиссею💪

🔥57❤‍🔥15👍12🐳3

Signed timofeos

8 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC≈2,050 views240 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

«Ты очень красивая» - плохой комплимент, она ничего ради этого не делала, это работа её родителей. «Ты конченая мужененавистница» - прекрасный комплимент, она очень старалась, это 100% её работа

😁135🔥51❤‍🔥40💔10🕊2👎1🤮1

Signed timofeos

7 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,990 views83 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

кроме шуток. идеальная свиданка - это завалиться в компьютерный и вдвоём рубиться в reanimal на пс5. это невьебенно круто. желательно чтобы комната была закрыта и огромный телик. это очень щщщщщикарно потрясно сказочно захватывающе интересно. даже не развязка истории а визуал мёртвая сказочность. всем советую. блять я хочу пережить это снова

❤‍🔥56🔥14👏10👎2🤮1

Signed timofeos

6 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈2,090 views169 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

я постоянно тусуюсь в одном Вольчека, сижу на топовом местечке по полдня. выучил уже всех сотрудников и замечаю, кто быстро устроился и быстро уволился. каждый из них иногда становится за кассу. когда в кофейне отдают заказ «здесь», то дают поднос, и сверху тонкий пергаментный лист, если в заказе есть булочка или тортик. поток большой, и все всегда при работе. так вот, по регламенту, пергамент, который используют для

💯71❤‍🔥41🔥38👏7🍓3💔3🤣3🌭1

Signed timofeos

5 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC≈1,900 views85 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

а вам не кажется, что из стола в реальный мир протиснулась жопка из какой-то игры?

💯52🔥18😁10🤮2🥰2👎1

Signed timofeos

4 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC≈2,080 views74 reactionsread 12 August 2026

я проснулся под пение чаек и шелест метлы. я посмотрел на время. 7:00. в фильме Вима Вендерса «Идеальные дни» есть похожая сцена. герой постоянно умиротворён. он не ставит себе будильник, а просыпается под шум метлы всегда в одно и то же время. Вендерс снял его в 77 лет. в Японии был проведён конкурс на фильм, который максимально точно описывает японский дух, и когда вышли «Идеальные дни», несмотря на то, что Вендерс

❤‍🔥46🔥11👏64🌭3👎1🤣1🤮1

Signed timofeos

3 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,860 views142 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

инструкция "как поцеловать парня": 1. схвати его за талию 2. засунь руку в его карман 3. вытащи оттуда бумажник 4. даже не думай целовать его 5. просто беги

😁92💯27❤‍🔥126🔥2👎1👏1🤮1

Signed timofeos

2 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,870 views18 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

на озоне тоже неплохие есть

❤‍🔥7👏4🔥3💋2👎1🤮1

Signed timofeos

2 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,910 views80 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥32😁20🤣18🔥3🕊2🌚1👎1👏1

Signed timofeos

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @proidemsyapotalii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 9,062 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пройдёмся по талии 18+” (@proidemsyapotalii), 5,661 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proidemsyapotalii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.