Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
Proibido Olhar 🌒
@proibidoolhar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
68,470subscribers
+384 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002018287483 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @proibidoolhar |
| Description | 🛕 Fatos históricos 🏞 Curiosidades 📚 Conhecimento |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/proibidoolhar |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 68,470 | +291 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 68,179 | -82 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 68,261 | -26 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 68,287 | -28 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 68,315 | +107 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 68,208 | -32 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 68,240 | +190 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 68,050 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 68,061 | -25 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 68,086 | first reading |
Engagement
81 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.07%
- avg views ÷ 68,470 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 735
- 81 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.06%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 81
- of 81 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 40 of 81 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 81 (5 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 59,543 |
| Reactions total | 322 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 586
- Videos
- 213
- Links
- 28
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 13m 28s
- Average length
- 32s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
322 reactions across 39 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 6.83% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 22 | 6.83% | |
| 😐 | 22 | 6.83% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 6.52% | |
| 🤯 | 20 | 6.21% | |
| 🗿 | 17 | 5.28% | |
| 🥰 | 17 | 5.28% | |
| 🏆 | 16 | 4.97% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 4.97% | |
| ⚡ | 15 | 4.66% | |
| 👀 | 15 | 4.66% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 4.35% | |
| 😱 | 14 | 4.35% | |
| 😈 | 13 | 4.04% | |
| 🫡 | 12 | 3.73% | |
| 👨💻 | 9 | 2.80% | |
| 🤔 | 9 | 2.80% | |
| 🤩 | 9 | 2.80% | |
| 🙊 | 8 | 2.48% | |
| ✍ | 7 | 2.17% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 2.17% | |
| 10 further kinds | 39 | 12.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 322reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Tóquio: a cidade que nunca dorme 😴 Você sabia que Tóquio, no Japão, é uma das maiores cidades do planeta? Sua aglomeração urbana reúne cerca de 40 milhões de pessoas. Isso é mais que a população de muitos países inteiros! E pensar que ainda tem gente que reclama do trânsito na nossa cidade... Um mar de gente e histórias: Imagina só: 40 milhões de pessoas tentando pegar o metrô às 8h da manhã. Cada uma com seus son…
👌1🤔1🤗1🤯1🫡1🙈1
Quais dos seguintes Streamings de Música você ouviu falar nos últimos dias?
- Amazon Music14%
- Spotify52%
- Deezer19%
- YouTube Music10%
- Nenhuma das opções5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Sticker, posted without a caption
🩹 O adesivo que acelera a cura Nos EUA, criaram um curativo elétrico que acelera a cicatrização em 30%. Basta molhar com água e ele gera uma corrente suave que estimula as células. Esse WPED também inibe bactérias com um custo de poucos dólares apenas. Tecnologia que une ciência e cuidado, um passo simples para a saúde. #tecnologia #saúde #inovação #ciência Um pequeno gesto que renova a esperança. 👀 @ProibidoO…
👨💻1🗿1🤔1🤩1🤯1🫡1😈1
Posted without readable text
Sticker, posted without a caption
⌚️ Casio JG-200: O Clássico de 1995 Em 1995, a Casio lançou o JG-200, um relógio digital que marcou época. Ele fazia parte da linha Jogger, criada especialmente para corredores e fãs de fitness. Naquela época, ter um relógio que acompanhasse seus treinos era revolucionário. Hoje, ele é um item vintage cobiçado por colecionadores. Cada detalhe, do design ao mostrador, conta uma história de inovação e estilo. Para mui…
⚡1👀1👨💻1🔥1😱1🙈1
Sticker, posted without a caption
💡 Lanterna MX FUEL ROCKET: 25.000 lúmens Para os reparos mais pesados, a iluminação não pode falhar. Conheça a torre portátil que transforma a noite em dia, com potência extrema e resistência profissional. 🔆 Potência Absurda: 25.000 lúmens para iluminar qualquer canteiro de obras. 🪫 Bateria MX FUEL: Tecnologia de ponta com autonomia para jornadas longas. 🧰 Design Robusto: Feito para aguentar o ritmo dos hardcores…
✍1👨💻1💊1🔥1🗿1🙈1
Sticker, posted without a caption
⚡️ Esquis elétricos Vipera: 16 km de pura adrenalina A startup americana Frigid Dynamics apresentou os esquis elétricos Vipera, com autonomia de 16 km e torque de 25 Nm. O preço completo é de US$ 3.000, unindo tecnologia e inovação para os amantes da neve. Com design arrojado e desempenho impressionante, o Vipera promete transformar a experiência em pistas. A Frigid Dynamics, conhecida por soluções extremas, traz a…
👌1🤗1🤝1🤯1😐1😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @proibidoolhar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@proibidoolhar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 9 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Quais dos seguintes Streamings de Música você ouviu falar nos últimos dias?
- Amazon Music14%
- Spotify52%
- Deezer19%
- YouTube Music10%
- Nenhuma das opções5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 395,913 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MeuCafeComDramas · 90,940
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 17 August 2026
@UniDraminhas · 124,201
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 16 August 2026
@Biblioteca_Gratis · 177,501
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 16 August 2026
@popcornportal · 101,860
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 16 August 2026
@Dicas_Financeiras_Poupanca · 96,516
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Proibido Olhar 🌒” (@proibidoolhar), 68,470 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proibidoolhar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.