3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 794–833 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 13:26
828
+15
7 Aug 2026, 16:54
813
+15
6 Aug 2026, 21:17
798
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
49.3%
avg views ÷ 828 subscribers
Avg views / post
408
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
16 (5 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
3,265
Reactions total
714
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,502 reactions across 16 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
320
21.3%
❤
210
14.0%
custom 5202154226746159674
120
7.99%
custom 5228845086258792600
100
6.66%
👍
99
6.59%
❤🔥
89
5.93%
😍
85
5.66%
🥰
65
4.33%
👏
50
3.33%
custom 5436299909395417113
45
3.00%
custom 5361547244854071345
44
2.93%
🤝
42
2.80%
😎
40
2.66%
💔
38
2.53%
😁
31
2.06%
🙏
30
2.00%
🙈
29
1.93%
custom 5445075171826240492
18
1.20%
custom 5228736492305681679
7
0.466%
custom 5321038509182580337
6
0.399%
8 further kinds
34
2.26%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,502reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
71
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 16 we hold a reading for · 94%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prohodimec_tlc80. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Первый день отпуска, как правило —
[ отходительно - ознакомительный ]
Тут главная задача какая 🔤
🔤свежесваренным кофе напоить
🔤вкусно накормить
🔤на берегу Катуни у костра усадить
и потихоньку начинать
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️❤
Для этого мы выбрали "Ороктойский район" ⛰️
Сам Чемальский тракт, как таковой,для
нас большой ценности не представляет.
Локации красивые безусловно есть, но из-за огромно…
Что ж, выходит победила
[ д р у ж б а ]
потому что в итоге нам откликнулась идея из комментариев — сперва пройтись по каждой локации отдельно, а потом собрать всё в один общий список🤩
❤ Спасибо всем, кто голосовал и
делился мыслями!
Маршрут у нас был рассчитан на 10 дней… и да, этого катастрофически мало для Алтая — согласны.
Поэтому в финальный список мы обязательно добавим ещё красивых локаций, которые не вошл…
После нашего видео с мамами вы попросили рассказать подробнее про наш маршрут…
Что ж, мы думали, это будет просто наше семейное путешествие, а оказалось, оно откликнулось и вам!
Это был наш первый Алтай глазами мам, и мы так хотели показать им все наши любимые места…(!!) А где-то мы и сами наконец-то побывали впервые.
Поэтому знайте — никакой пощады не было 🤭 Каждый день был наполнен до краёв: горы, озёра, перевалы…
когда ты сидишь у костра,
смотришь на горы, а внутри тебя…
в с ё з а м и р а е т
В такие моменты тишина звучит громче любых аккордов. Она отдаётся эхом в горах и остаётся в душе ещё долго после того, как погаснет костёр…
#МеняяГородНаГоры
|| Большинство попыток проснуться и
встретить рассвет у нас с треском проваливаются”
Проще его дождаться, честное слово | 💥
Будильник что-то там мурлычет, мы его выключаем, переворачиваемся на другой
бок и… ну вы поняли 🤭
◻️Но те редкие моменты, когда попытка
◻️всё-таки оборачивается успехом,
◻️всё больше и больше заставляют
◻️пересмотреть ценность сна🔤
🤩🤩🤩🤩
… когда ты выбираешься из машины,
сон…
🔤 что по поводу закатов…?
Зимой мы писали пост о крайней редкости такого события на Алтае. Солнце всегда садится где-то там… скромно, за хребтами, оставляя долины лишь в мягких сумерках…
… но в этой поездке Алтай с нами был невероятно щедр!
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️❤
Просто, понимаете…
Закаты здесь — как подарок, которого не ждал. Мы бросаем всё, выпрыгиваем из машины и просто смотрим, как солнце тонет за горами…
В такие мо…
Кстати… Дима с Ольгой знают Алтай не просто по картам — когда‑то они сами были гидами и возили по Горному джип-туры. И не год-два, а целых 10 лет (!!) Так что знают эти места, как свои пять пальцев.
…а теперь и для нас стали отличными проводниками в мир неизведанных нами троп
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️❤
И первая рекомендация — «локация-затычка» 😅
Почему затычка? Да потому что находится
всего в 5 км от Чуйского тракта, а…
А еще… мы наконец-то нашли время в наших плотных [ v a n l i f e ]
графиках и встретились с
Димой и Ольгой •Go Za Gorod•
Если коротко, ребята умеют
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Столько эпичных историй мы давно не слышали — диких, смешных, немного безумных, и таких настоящих!
◻️Спасибо за уютный вечер
◻️от заката до рассвета ❤
И отдельное спасибо за невероятно вкусные угощения! Такие встречи греют даже больше, чем костёр в горах…
М…
С топливом, конечно, бедаааа… да
Нооо, это ведь не помешает нам продолжать
путешествовать…?
📹 КОРОТКОМЕТРАЖКА:
🚐🚐🚐🚐 L a n d C r u i s e r 80’
🚐🚐🚐🚐 и заправка воды
🤩🤩🤩🤩
#БытНаКолёсах
…ходят слухи,
что скоро все мы пересядем на🔤 велосипеды🔤
В нижнем Горном проблемы с топливом начались буквально на днях.
А теперь, благодаря созданному ажиотажу, очереди докатились и до дальнего Горного. До этого мы не встречали ни очередей, ни ограничений по литражу —
всё было спокойно.
[про цены говорить не вижу смысла]
здесь и в обычные времена чем ближе к Монголии, тем выше ценник.
А ещё, за эту поездку мы заме…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @prohodimec_tlc80. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Одним постом — со списком всех локаций и остановок 📋19%
Сделать серию публикаций — каждую локацию показать во всех подробностях 📸81%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 20,942 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Меняя город на горы” (@prohodimec_tlc80), 828 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prohodimec_tlc80.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
