Channel
@programmazionetime
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,945subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001089875471 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @programmazionetime |
| Description | NUOVO CANALE TELEGRAM 👉 @programmazionetime_official |
| Created | 14 October 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/programmazionetime |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 1,945 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 1,945 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 October 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Programmazione Time pinned «Ciao a tutti quanti! È passato davvero tanto tempo dall’ultima volta che ho scritto su questo canale e in generale pubblicato video sul canale. Mi scuso con la community, ma sono stati anni difficili e impegnativi. Ora come ben vedete sono tornato, non da…»
Ciao a tutti quanti! È passato davvero tanto tempo dall’ultima volta che ho scritto su questo canale e in generale pubblicato video sul canale. Mi scuso con la community, ma sono stati anni difficili e impegnativi. Ora come ben vedete sono tornato, non da pubblicare video ogni giorno, ma sicuramente da riprendere in mano il canale e aggiornarlo. Ho ripulito il canale dalle cose vecchie, inutili o fatte troppo male (…
Channel photo updated
La risposta corretta a questo sondaggio è: sia compilato sia interpretato. Ebbene sì Python è un ibrido, spesso però non si fa menzione di questa cosa e si tende a ridurlo come semplice linguaggio interpretato. Quindi capisco il 36% dei voti che ha scelto quella opzione. Non capisco come però ci sia un 10% che voti solo compilato😕
La risposta corretta a questo sondaggio è: HDD. Molto bello vedere però il dibattito nei commenti. Tuttavia la domanda era molto più base e sul filo teorico/potenziale.
Altro mini quiz a bruciapelo, non vale guardare su internet, siate sinceri. Python è un linguaggio:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Non mi faccio sentire da un po' e mi dispiace, ma l'università tira molti colpi a sorpresa e tornerò il prima possibile. Tuttavia, piccola domanda di curiosità: secondo voi in linea teorica/potenziale dura si più un HDD o un SSD?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
(scusate se non mi faccio vivo, ma questi mesi sono di sopravvivenza)
Buon natale a tutti quanti 🎊🎄
Esercizi di deduzione naturale https://youtu.be/YG4OEtidePw
⚠️ AVVISO ⚠️ Per lunedì prossimo è previsto un ultimo video per questo periodo, non perché abbia concluso gli argomenti di logica, ma perché come sapete inizia il periodo parziali e da dover sistemarsi bene entro il mese di gennaio/febbraio (motivi esame). Quindi mi auguro di completare gli ultimi argomenti durante il periodo natalizio e di pubblicarli il prima possibile.
Deduzione naturale logica proposizionale https://youtu.be/GJqic9oDtWU
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @programmazionetime. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Altro mini quiz a bruciapelo, non vale guardare su internet, siate sinceri. Python è un linguaggio:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Non mi faccio sentire da un po' e mi dispiace, ma l'università tira molti colpi a sorpresa e tornerò il prima possibile. Tuttavia, piccola domanda di curiosità: secondo voi in linea teorica/potenziale dura si più un HDD o un SSD?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Come preferite? (Gli argomenti sono comunque indipendenti quasi, cioè avere prima uno l'altro non cambia molto)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2021 to 29 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,257,510 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Programmazione Time” (@programmazionetime), 1,945 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/programmazionetime.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.