masuk ga anjing!
🤩4❤🔥1

Channel
@progixo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001844150385 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @progixo |
| Description | collab or anything @ofcprogixobot |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 23 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/progixo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 18 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 18 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 23 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 50.0% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 28.6% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 14.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2023 to 1 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
masuk ga anjing!
🤩4❤🔥1
hey bro!! #progixō oplink for only boys rpi/w, follow the existing rules and use the atb that has been provided, les't go join us at the base. © 𝗢𝗙𝗖 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗚𝗜𝗫𝗢
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 ⚠️ Dikarenakan own ch @progixo acc nya ke deak, maka dari itu ch progixo beralih ke ch @ofcprogixo.
Sticker, posted without a caption
𝐁𝐈𝐆 𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐋𝐀𝐁𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 ㅤㅤ PROGIXO 𝐒pecial 𝐓ag's: @ofcprogixo @mafav1st @koserbois @boilos @pafav1st Thankyou to partner for big collaboration wōkar
typo ny*
sama aku aja kolebnya
📝 enak my koleb ama sq mne nih? 👤 @sepaweofc 👤 @ofcgoriz 👤 @mapulos 👤 sama aku❤️ 👤 @mafav1st 👤 @koserbois 👤 gatau 👤 @borsatofc @boilos 👥 8 people have voted so far. 📖 Anonymous Board
close brow
minal aidin wal faidzin mohon maaf lahir dan batin, kalo ada salah tolong di maafin kalo thr jangan dilupain
Minal Aidin Walfaidzin, pogok
❤4
السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ 𝔇𝔢𝔫𝔤𝔞𝔫 𝔰𝔢𝔤𝔞𝔩𝔞 𝔨𝔢𝔱𝔲𝔩𝔲𝔰𝔞𝔫 𝔥𝔞𝔱𝔦 𝔨𝔞𝔪𝔦 𝔰𝔢𝔨𝔢𝔩𝔲𝔞𝔯𝔤𝔞 𝔪𝔢𝔫𝔤𝔲𝔠𝔞𝔭𝔨𝔞𝔫 🙏🏼😇: S𝔢𝔩𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔱 ℌ𝔞𝔯𝔦 ℜ𝔞𝔶𝔞 ℑ𝔡𝔲𝔩 𝔉𝔦𝔱𝔯𝔦 1 𝔖𝔶𝔞𝔴𝔞𝔩 1444 ℌ 🕌🕋 *Taqoballohu Minna Waminkum* *Mohon maaf lahir & Bathin* 🤝 S𝔢𝔪𝔬𝔤𝔞 𝔄𝔩𝔩𝔞𝔥 SWT 𝔪𝔢𝔪𝔟𝔢𝔯𝔦𝔨𝔞𝔫 𝔨𝔦𝔱𝔞 𝔲𝔪𝔲𝔯 𝔭𝔞𝔫𝔧𝔞𝔫𝔤 𝔶𝔞𝔫𝔤 𝔟𝔞𝔯𝔬𝔨𝔞𝔥 & 𝔨𝔢𝔰𝔢𝔥𝔞𝔱𝔞𝔫 𝔰𝔢𝔥𝔦𝔫𝔤𝔤𝔞 𝔟𝔦𝔰𝔞 𝔟𝔢𝔯𝔱𝔢𝔪𝔲 𝔨𝔢𝔪𝔟𝔞𝔩𝔦 𝔡𝔢𝔫𝔤𝔞𝔫 ℜ𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔡𝔥𝔞𝔫 𝔶𝔞𝔫𝔤 𝔞𝔨𝔞𝔫 𝔡𝔞𝔱𝔞𝔫𝔤 🤲🏻 وَالسَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُه
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @progixo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,076,068 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@progixo named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PRØGIXO” (@progixo), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/progixo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.