Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Prof. Renzo Cavani 📚

Channel

Prof. Renzo Cavani 📚

@profrenzocavani

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

309subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001502045001
TypeChannel
Username@profrenzocavani
CreatedBetween 1 December 2020 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/profrenzocavani

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3093193147 August 2026 — 319 subscribers8 August 2026 — 319 subscribers8 August 2026 — 318 subscribers30 August 2026 — 316 subscribers9 September 2026 — 314 subscribers17 September 2026 — 313 subscribers1 October 2026 — 311 subscribers12 October 2026 — 309 subscribers7 August 202612 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 66 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 308–321 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 16:10309-2
1 Oct 2026, 19:55311-2
17 Sept 2026, 14:59313-1
9 Sept 2026, 03:36314-2
30 Aug 2026, 11:45316-2
8 Aug 2026, 16:57318-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:32319no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:06319first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 10 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1965.5%
❤620.7%
👏413.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2023 to 8 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Nov 2023, 00:30 UTC895 viewsread 8 August 2026

¡Sígueme en mi nuevo canal de Whatsapp! https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaDUR1B4CrfgTZQvMT2u

27 Oct 2023, 11:32 UTC998 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

¡Se acabó la espera! Ya tengo entre mis manos mi más reciente libro "El proceso civil en su laberinto. Ensayos para una reforma" (Zela, 2023). Quedó muy lindo y, como podrán ver en el mismo libro, tengo mucho que agradecer. A todos/as aquellos que lo compraron en preventa seguro que les llegará en breve. ¡Adelante!

👍7👏4❤3

31 Aug 2023, 17:42 UTC893 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Será un auténtico honor y profunda alegría estar junto a todos/as estos amigos/as, hablando sobre la vida y obra del inolvidable Profesor Carlos Alberto Alvaro de Oliveira. El evento será en el auditorio del Complejo NOS PUCP (segundo piso) y es totalmente gratuito. ¡No dejen de inscribirse! https://forms.gle/iEAGnEEysyNjgrm17

👍6❤1

30 Aug 2023, 18:44 UTC528 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Queridos/as: Mañana tendremos un evento muy importante, organizado por el área de Sistema de Justicia de la PUCP y el Instituto Iberoamericano de Derecho Procesal, en que se discutirá sobre las reglas de valoración de la prueba y estándares de la prueba en las reglas ELI/UNIDROIT. Participarán como ponentes principales los profesores Michael Stürner, Elena D'Alessandro, Raul Núñez Ojeda y Sérgio Cruz Arenhart (quien…

👍1

29 Aug 2023, 13:35 UTC380 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Este lunes 4 de septiembre, a las 10am, en el Complejo NOS PUCP, se presentará el libro "El proceso civil visto desde los derechos fundamentales" (Zela, 2023), de Carlos Alberto Alvaro de Oliveira, querido profesor titular de derecho procesal civil de la UFRGS, quien falleciera hace diez años. Se trata de un texto de algunos de sus artículos, editado y traducido por Stefan Espejo y por un servidor, en donde intervien…

👍2

10 Aug 2023, 20:30 UTC443 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

La semana pasada estuve en Huancayo y tuve la oportunidad de dar una charla en el Colegio de Abogados de Junín y en la Corte Superior de Justicia de Junín, sobre los problemas en la fijación de puntos controvertidos y sobre la prohibición de reemplazar cargas probatorias como condición de aplicación de la prueba de oficio del art. 194 CPC. ¡Bellos momentos y grandes experiencias!

👍3❤2

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @profrenzocavani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Prof. Renzo Cavani 📚” (@profrenzocavani), 309 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profrenzocavani.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.