Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Манипуляции под микроскопом

Channel

Манипуляции под микроскопом

@profipsiho

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

10,841subscribers

-222 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002189674425
TypeChannel
Username@profipsiho
DescriptionВидишь больше — влияешь сильнее. Профайлинг, НЛП, переговоры — читай людей, управляй игрой! Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3Ngbqb Реклама: 👉 @marketingpsiho
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/profipsiho

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,84111,06810,954.57 August 202610 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 95 days, net -222. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,807–11,102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 07:0010,841-11
8 Nov 2026, 16:0010,852-5
7 Nov 2026, 11:5710,857-1
6 Nov 2026, 14:4010,858-2
5 Nov 2026, 17:3910,860-5
4 Nov 2026, 17:2510,865-5
3 Nov 2026, 16:1810,870-10
2 Nov 2026, 14:0710,880-1
1 Nov 2026, 15:3810,881+1
31 Oct 2026, 17:4810,880-1
30 Oct 2026, 16:3010,881-4
29 Oct 2026, 15:3710,885-4
28 Oct 2026, 11:5910,889-3
27 Oct 2026, 11:2510,892-7
26 Oct 2026, 09:1510,899-6
25 Oct 2026, 06:2910,905-3
24 Oct 2026, 05:5710,908-2
23 Oct 2026, 05:2610,910-6
22 Oct 2026, 03:0710,916+3
20 Oct 2026, 22:3910,913first reading

Engagement

77 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.7%
avg views ÷ 10,841 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,810
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 77 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held77 (20 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total52,420
Reactions total1,453
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 22:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
924
Videos
104
Links
126

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 36s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,943 reactions across 75 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,45036.8%
👍1,08627.5%
💯60315.3%
🔥3939.97%
😁1353.42%
👏721.83%
👌481.22%
🤣471.19%
🙏310.786%
🤗150.38%
✍110.279%
👎100.254%
⚡90.228%
😱70.178%
🤪60.152%
🤯50.127%
🥰40.101%
🌭20.051%
😈20.051%
🙉20.051%
5 further kinds50.127%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,943 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 77 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @profipsiho. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 77 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.30%
1 of 77 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,420
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,090
over 76 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqwNihSb126 August 202626 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 17:08 UTC424 views25 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

💊 Эффект плацебо и НЛП Часть техник НЛП работает не потому, что в них есть магия, а потому что мозг верит в результат. Когда человеку говорят: «Сейчас ты почувствуешь уверенность», - он действительно чувствует. Почему? Потому что ожидание запускает ту же физиологию, что и «реальная» причина. ⚡Ловушка в том, что иногда работает не метод, а вера в метод. Но согласитесь, если помогает - то уже не впустую.

👍20❤5

9 Nov 2026, 09:04 UTC935 views45 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Синдром спасателя Есть люди, которые не умеют жить без чужих проблем. 📍 Им нужно кого-то чинить, лечить, спасать, иначе тревожно. Без драмы им скучно, без страдания - непонятно, кто они. Они называют это “заботой”, но по сути ищут смысл через других. Юнг бы сказал: это Герой, застрявший на уровне “помощи”. Он спасает всех, кроме себя. А потом удивляется, почему снова устал и обижен. Что делать спасателю 1️⃣ Сн…

🔥24👍12❤5✍3💯1

9 Nov 2026, 08:00 UTC891 views2 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Как давно ты хочешь кайфовой, легкой и уверенной реализации? Ради которой не нужно пахать 24/7, выгорать на работе и соглашаться на меньшее в деньгах и отношениях. Куда проще загнать себя в рамки «надо», чем разрешить себе заявить: «Я достойна большего». Если надоело экономить на себе, откладывать жизнь на потом и застревать в сомнениях — пора убрать внутренний блок, который держит на месте. Прямо сейчас в канале…

❤1👎1

8 Nov 2026, 15:40 UTC≈1,010 views36 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Факт на заметку Когда вы слегка киваете во время разговора, человек подсознательно чувствует согласие и безопасность. 📌 Это помогает установить контакт, снизить напряжение и сделать общение мягче. Используйте, если хотите, чтобы вас услышали: • в переговорах • на встречах • в сложных разговорах. Кивание не заставит согласиться, но создаст ощущение партнёрства - и тогда аргументы звучат убедительнее.

❤22👍12👏2

7 Nov 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,130 views42 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Говорить «нет» - не грубо. Грубо - соглашаться, а потом злиться. Мягкое «нет» звучит спокойно и без оправданий: «Мне это не подходит», «Сейчас я не готов(а)», «Я выбираю иначе». Не объясняйте лишнего - оправдания открывают дверь для давления. Если хочется смягчить тон, добавьте: «Я понимаю тебя, но решение остаётся моим». 👌 Уверенное «нет» сохраняет отношения лучше, чем вынужденное «да».

👍29❤10🔥3

6 Nov 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,250 views48 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Зачем вообще знать про психотипы, если вы не психолог? Да чтобы общаться проще. Люди по-разному воспринимают информацию: одним нужны факты, другим - эмоции, третьим - примеры из жизни. Если говорить «на своём языке», собеседник просто… не слышит. Понимая, кто перед вами - параноял, эмотив, истероид или эпилептоид - вы не тратите энергию зря. 👉 Вы говорите так, как человек привык воспринимать. И вас понимают.

❤30👍16🔥2

5 Nov 2026, 18:55 UTC≈1,370 views59 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Уверенность - не признак правоты. Человек говорит громко, не сомневается и смотрит прямо в глаза? Мозг уже готов ему поверить. Но исследования показывают: уверенность не всегда соответствует реальной компетентности. 📌 Как не попасться? Оценивайте не манеру речи, а аргументы. Даже самый убедительный человек может нести полную чушь. Причём с идеальной дикцией.

❤25💯18👍16

4 Nov 2026, 17:06 UTC≈1,600 views48 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Почему после первого «да» сложно сказать «нет»? Сначала вас просят помочь на 5 минут. Потом - на 3 часа. А отказаться уже неловко. Это приём «нога в двери»: согласившись на мелочь, человек чаще соглашается на большее. 📌 Защита: каждую просьбу оценивайте отдельно. Первое «да» не обязывает вас соглашаться на всё.

👍36❤12

3 Nov 2026, 18:20 UTC≈1,790 views49 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Излюбленный способ манипуляторов, это приводить выдуманные примеры, не конкретные, а кем то, где то услышанные или в прямом смысле придуманные. Чтобы ответить на манипуляцию, всегда можно заземлить человека: «давай поговорим о конкретных примерах». Всё, на этом манипулятор сливается

👍26❤20🔥3

2 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,960 views53 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Почему некоторые люди бесят нас с первой минуты? Иногда дело вовсе не в них. Представьте: вас раздражает человек, который постоянно хвастается. А теперь вопрос: может, вам самим хочется признания, но вы запрещаете себе его добиваться? В психологии есть понятие «проекция» - когда мы приписываем другим собственные чувства или желания. 📌 Но не спешите искать в каждом раздражении скрытую зависть. Попробуйте спросить…

❤28💯14👍9⚡2

1 Nov 2026, 16:19 UTC≈1,670 views53 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Почему мы добровольно пугаем себя? Хорроры, квесты, дома с привидениями. Казалось бы, зачем платить за собственный ужас? Всё дело в контролируемом страхе. Мозг распознаёт угрозу, запускает реакцию возбуждения, но одновременно мы понимаем: опасность ненастоящая. И вот интересное: исследования показывают, что умеренный страх в безопасной обстановке может приносить удовольствие. 📌 А теперь вопрос: почему одни обожа…

❤29💯17🤯5🙉2

31 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC≈1,810 views57 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🎃 Почему некоторым нравится, когда вы боитесь? Замечали людей, которые специально пугают других, а потом смеются? Психологи выделяют черту «повседневный садизм» - склонность получать удовольствие от чужих страданий. Но не каждый любитель розыгрышей - садист! 🚩 Обратите внимание на реакцию: если человек видит, что вам действительно страшно, но продолжает пугать - это тревожный сигнал. 📌 Главный маркер не сама шут…

💯34👍11❤7👌4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @profipsiho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 7 posts on @profipsiho as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Oct 2026, 15:45 UTCAnonymous Quiz814 voters

«Либо ты даёшь мне пароль от телефона, либо тебе есть что скрывать»

  1. Ложная дилемма72%
  2. Эффект ореола8%
  3. Эффект якоря8%
  4. Социальное доказательство12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTCAnonymous Poll257 voters

Согласны с этой концепцией?

  1. Да42%
  2. Нет34%
  3. У меня свои мысли на этот счет27%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTCAnonymous Quiz840 voters

Как называется техника, когда манипулятор сначала оказывает чрезмерное внимание и делает комплименты, а затем резко теряет интерес?

  1. Лавбомбинг44%
  2. Газлайтинг35%
  3. Стоунволлинг9%
  4. Треангуляция12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Манипуляции под микроскопом” (@profipsiho), 10,841 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profipsiho.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.