Channel
@profgorozhanka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,618subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001357993239 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @profgorozhanka |
| Created | 25 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/profgorozhanka |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 1,618 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 1,620 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 1,620 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (7 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,252 |
| Reactions total | 199 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
312 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 123 | 39.4% | |
| 🔥 | 108 | 34.6% | |
| 🦄 | 81 | 26.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 312reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Любуемся высокой травой на недавно благоустроенной улице 9 января. Траве в городе важно давать расти и не косить ее слишком часто. Писала о том, что нужно отстать от травы раз и два.
❤16🔥10🦄6
Просто красивый паровозик летних веранд в отдельно взятом квартале на проспекте Мира ✨
❤15🦄7🔥6
Разыгрываем места на онлайн-курс об урбанистике 🎁 Вместе с онлайн-лекторием «Глазами инженера» запускаем розыгрыш — дарим 2 места на новый курс «Анатомия города: от античных сеток до утопий будущего». Этот курс — путеводитель по главным идеям городского проектирования. Мы пройдем путь от идеальных планов древних греков до футуристических концепций «летающих городов» и современных «15-минутных районов». Познакомит…
❤15🔥13🦄10
Новый тренд: дороги сужают, тротуары расширяют В Красноярске идёт дорожный ремонт, и многие водители недовольны новинкой: тротуары расширяют для велодорожек, убирая парковочные карманы. На местных каналах вышли репортажи: водители возмущены, и так в центре встать негде! Проект поперечных улиц центра готовило бюро «Проектдевелопмент». Его руководитель Антон Шаталов объясняет простую вещь: СИМ прочно вошли в нашу жиз…
🔥23❤9🦄5
Цветочки бы поближе Вот для кого выставляют цветы в горшках на разделителе широченной дороги? Кому на них любоваться? Водителям, проезжающим на высокой скорости, я уверена, глубоко все равно. Пешеходам с тротуара тем более ничего не видно. Вот взять бы все цветы со всех дорог и сделать живую цветущую стену в одном из общественных пространств города. Их бы точно на такое хватило! Горожане смогли бы восхищаться и фот…
❤15🦄12🔥9
Кормим не тех Тревожные природные факты происходят на Татышеве. Голуби прознали, что сусликам приносят еду и теперь массово присутствуют на поляне и этих самых сусликов объедают. Ведут себя довольно агрессивно и напористо, быстро действуют группой — у сусликов просто нет шансов. Люди приходят покормить сусликов, но получается, что кормят голубей. Этому способствуют и бизнесы на острове: они продают семечки для сусл…
🦄12❤10🔥6
Июль 2025 В моей галерее много снятого, но так и не опубликованного. Хочу это менять. Вот стрит-арт из июля 2025 года, скорее всего его уже не существует.
❤16🔥8🦄8
Перед вами скульптура «Вечная жизнь», установленная в июне 2008 года на старте появления парка 400-летия Красноярска. 18 лет назад это наверняка казалось отличной идеей, но сейчас скульптура выглядит неопрятно, непонятно и неуместно что-ли, — стоит такой кусок бетона между деревьев. С другой стороны, как-никак 18 лет стоит, уже артефакт! Вы бы скульптуру оставили (🔥) или убрали (🦄)?
🔥26🦄9❤4
Эту стройку века мы переживем Город торопится стать к юбилею краше, поэтому делает сразу все: строит метро, благоустраивает улицы, ремонтирует фасады и обновляет дороги. Бедные горожане, на которых свалилась вся эта подготовка, стонут и возмущаются. Есть за что: в центре вообще складываются опасные для жизни ситуации, когда идти по ремонту просто небезопасно. Культура организации работ у нас и так низкая, а когда на…
❤23🦄12🔥7
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @profgorozhanka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 898,471 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Профессиональная горожанка” (@profgorozhanka), 1,618 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profgorozhanka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.