Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Продан Андрей

@prodan_psy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,195subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002398870930
TypeChannel
Username@prodan_psy
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/prodan_psy

Growth

1,1951,1971,1967 August 2026 — 1,197 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,197 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,195 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,195–1,197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 05:421,195-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:181,197no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:241,197first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 21s
Average length
1m 21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

274 reactions across 18 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13147.8%
❤‍🔥3111.3%
💘259.12%
🔥207.30%
🕊145.11%
😁134.74%
💔93.28%
🤝72.55%
👍51.82%
💯51.82%
😍41.46%
🏆20.73%
10.365%
10.365%
🌚10.365%
🍌10.365%
🍓10.365%
🐳10.365%
🥰10.365%
🦄10.365%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 274reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 10 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prodan_psy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 February 2026 to 10 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Apr 2026, 13:09 UTC≈1,130 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дамы и господа, давно не виделись. Дочитал «Отверженные» Решил поделиться чувствами и мыслями на ютубе ) https://youtu.be/YH1-AHWwBY4?si=UURxPySfX_kro3jy

8💘3❤‍🔥2🕊2

20 Mar 2026, 10:11 UTC≈1,470 views32 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Если Вы хотите безопасность, чаще всего это обернется гиперконтролем, который будет переназван как-то иначе: заботой/ вниманием. Если Вы хотите быть как за каменной стеной, смотрите в сторону собственной незрелости. Дозревая, появляется другие цели, другие желания.

25🕊3🐳1👍1💯1🦄1

15 Mar 2026, 22:16 UTC≈1,350 views29 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Если у вас есть «синдром самозванца» и вы думаете, что ничего не знаете, предлагаю посмотреть в сторону одной мысли: а вдруг это правда? И вы действительно ничего не понимаете и просто хотите получить результат, ничего для этого не сделав ? Чаще всего «синдром самозванца» лечится учебой и практикой, а не поисками секретиков. Просто этот вариант не особо устраивает.

19💔71🔥1🕊1

8 Mar 2026, 09:44 UTC≈1,310 views60 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Дамы, поздравляю вас с праздником. Не меняйте своё естество на пыль в глаза, следуя современным тенденциям. Чья-то сила - в силе. Кто-то злой, кто-то грустный. Кто-то женственная и нежная, кто-то с характером - и коня на ходу остановит. И с этим всё в порядке. Все по-своему разные, и в этом есть красота. Каждая по-своему индивидуальна и хороша. Главное - знать свои сильные стороны и не изменять им ) Желаю психичес

35💘14😁8🕊3

5 Mar 2026, 12:55 UTC≈1,060 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Андрей, а как ты понял что хочешь остаться именно у этого конкретного психолога в терапии? Как вообще понять что нужно остановиться именно у этого психолога ( если это какой то поиск психолога) ? Я выбираю по внутренней зрелости и спокойствию. И ухожу если пушат к успешному успеху разгоняя маниакал. Хотя лет 5 назад оч даже был не против этого и даже сторонником. Ps: Точно также я скакал по «веткам реальности» и афф

5❤‍🔥2🕊2

4 Mar 2026, 17:12 UTC895 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Андрей привет Расскажи о своём опыте личной психотерапии Правда ли что она болезненна и тяжела особенно на начальном этапе?

❤‍🔥3💔2🕊2👍1

3 Mar 2026, 18:34 UTC800 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Поговорим ? Спрашивайте анонимно. Отвечу завтра

11🌚1🥰1😁1

2 Mar 2026, 13:48 UTC826 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

1). понять, что эти клише ничего не дают, кроме очень частичного описания вашего поведения. Если вы «тревожный» или «избегающий», то это говорит лишь о том, что ваша привязанность нарушена - и это ключевое. Скорее всего, не было постоянного хорошего объекта рядом. Важно понимать, что тревожный будет отыгрывать в избегание при интенсивном уровне контакта, и также наоборот: у избегающего - он будет липнуть, если вы е

4🔥3🏆2🍓1💘1

2 Mar 2026, 13:48 UTC705 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Что делать, если вы «тревожный»? Распишу ниже )

😍41🍌1💘1

28 Feb 2026, 10:52 UTC760 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как думаешь, что будет с психикой людей когда будет достигнута технологическая сингулярность? Говорят индивидуальность будет нарушена.. Я не особо понимаю что такое сингулярность, но думаю речь идет о прогрессе.. На мой взгляд, путь к индивидуальности лежит через внутренне взросление, далее, через внутренюю отдельность и формирование своего мнения…А чтобы его формировать надо ни ссать и что то делать с жизнью, зада

5❤‍🔥2🔥1🕊1

28 Feb 2026, 09:46 UTC640 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Портал в АД открыт? Ну или портальчик ?)😁 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVOB_RTjUQa/?igsh=M3ZzcGk2a2JmaQ==

😁2

17 Feb 2026, 18:18 UTC896 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

8❤‍🔥3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @prodan_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Продан Андрей” (@prodan_psy), 1,195 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prodan_psy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.