Channel
@probyzavtra
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,817subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002627062692 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @probyzavtra |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 15 June 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/probyzavtra |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 2,817 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 2,814 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 2,806 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 2,802 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 15 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
585 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 352 | 60.2% | |
| 👍 | 97 | 16.6% | |
| 🔥 | 95 | 16.2% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 2.05% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 1.88% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 1.03% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 0.855% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 0.684% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.342% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.171% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 585reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2025 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @probyzavtra. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 June 2025 to 19 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Продолжаем душнить 😎 Что должно лежать на Яндекс.Диске актера. После регистрации на всех платформах наступает момент, когда в каждом втором кастинге у вас просят ссылки на материалы. Обычно это ссылка на профиль фт (filmtoolz) и ссылка на диск(пробы или портфолио). И тут начинается творчество. У кого-то папка называется "Новая папка (17)" У кого-то фотографии вперемешку со скриншотами доставки роллов (не шучу) …
❤51👍6🔥5
ВГИК 2026 Экзамен ✅ Спасибо за атмосферу✨
🔥37❤23👏5👍2
Posted without readable text
Итак, вот вы уже в полны решимости и даже есть парочка тг каналов, куда вы подписались и видите кастинги. А там во всех постах просят какие-то ссылки. На какие-то профресурсы. Какое-то ФТ, КТ, ЯД, какие-то ссылки, какие-то визитки. Давайте разберем по порядку: ФТ - Filmtoolz Вообще это не только, про кастинг, это платформа по оптимизации кинопроизводства(планирование, бюджетирование и тд), но сейчас не об этом. Н…
❤21🔥6👍3
Наболевшим-нашумевшим в наших внутрикухонных профессиональных дискуссиях хочу запустить череду постов по первым и может быть даже вторым шагам в киноиндустрии. Пусть оно будет хотя бы точечно, но понятно. Итак, вы приняли решение стать актером, покорять сцену и экран, радовать собой, транслировать в мир ценности, служить Мельпомене и кинобогам. Или вы уже потратили четыре года на то, чтобы изучить Станиславского, н…
❤27👍19🔥3🙏1
Всем привет! Очень много букв, но очень важно ✨
Дорогие актеры! Сейчас будет много важных букв! Все больше и чаще вы, и мы, сталкиваемся с появлением так называемых перекупов - это псевдо-агенты, которые находят кастинги в открытом доступе и почему-то решают, что они могут удерживать с вас 20 процентов только лишь потому, что они увидели этот кастинг первыми. Как правило, эти люди не имеют ничего общего с агентсткой деятельностью. Если вы подаёте заявку через н…
❤60👍31👏7🔥4🙏3
Догуливаем-прогуливаем последние деньки перед активным и верю, что продуктивным годом, а как вы перезагружались в каникулы?🎉
❤33🔥12👍11
Пока все доедают салаты, смотрят сказки и волшебное кино, мне попался абсолютно противоположный фильм, от которого некомфортно на физическом уровне. Вот интересно, только мне ли. Кто-нибудь смотрел "Я бы тебя пнула, если бы могла"? https://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/7129355
❤1
Привет, ну раз решила не прогуливать - надо держать настрой 😎 Каналов сейчас конечно множество, и очень интересно коллеги пишут. Задумалась над вектором. На какие темы хочется почитать/подумать/поговорить?
❤12👍1🔥1
Всех с наступившим 2026 годом! 🎄 Пусть он будет для всех "на коне" 🏇 Пусть у всех будут не только "пробы завтра", но и смены сегодня и чем больше, тем лучше ✨ Попробую не прогуливать 😎
❤81🔥27👍9🎉5❤🔥4🤩2🦄1
Время открытий: Приехала из студии в половине первого — как уже три часа? Проснулась в восемь — как уже десять? Зашла в проект — как, больше месяца без постов? А можно вот ту суперспособность из детства? Когда уже столько всего передумала и, может быть, даже переделала, а прошла всего минута — ну, максимум пять? А у вас как со временем? Тоже летает?
❤43👍15💯11🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @probyzavtra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,403,269 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пробы завтра” (@probyzavtra), 2,817 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/probyzavtra.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.