4 measurements spanning 14 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 300–301 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 16:37
301
+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:02
300
no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:30
300
-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:23
301
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.5%
avg views ÷ 301 subscribers
Avg views / post
61.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held
18 (16 June 2026 – 28 July 2026)
Views total
185
Reactions total
21
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 39s
Average length
55s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
209 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
89
42.6%
custom 5264953301518001238
24
11.5%
custom 5339314746078276018
20
9.57%
custom 5276412231314055303
17
8.13%
😍
13
6.22%
custom 5242658083334800518
11
5.26%
custom 5332570689645856089
10
4.78%
👍
9
4.31%
custom 5276292758208782142
6
2.87%
custom 5442751169317324380
4
1.91%
👌
2
0.957%
💔
2
0.957%
🤡
2
0.957%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ну и ласт колл! ⬆️В чт я уеду на месяц и у вас может быть крайний раз прекрасного чилла флекса и наслаждения природой в музее Российского леса 💚 слушайте и проникайте за кулисы тайги
«Где в лице тигра, обрамлённом белой бородой и с глазами пожилого мусульманина, мы чтим первого магометанина и читаем сущность Ислама».
Зверинец Хлебникова
Странная фраза? Именно поэтому она цепляет! Верую ибо абсурдно
Для Хлебникова тигр был не просто красивым зверем. Он видел в нём древний образ, в котором природа, человек и миф ещё не успели разделиться.
Мне часто чтобы увидеть что-то новое нужно начать рассказ…
Спасибо всем, кто проголосовал в опросе!
На сегодня — главный вопрос:
Вы вообще знаете, что 29 июля в Музее леса на Павелецкой будет День тигра?
И мы его придумали так, чтобы вам точно захотелось прийти (или повторить у себя — потому что механики настолько простые, что их можно собрать за вечер).
Вот что вас ждёт:
🎬 с утра — мультфильмы про полосатых
🎥 днём — «Маугли» (да, тот самый, 100 минут ностальгии)
🎨 посл…
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
У нас с вами тематика канала какая? Экологическая
Вот вам видео как жаба гадюку
Е
Ла
Ровно год назад в Бельбекской долине, это то что вам нужно после понедельника (там очень неожиданный конец)
Наше домашнее животное — это плющ. 🌿
Он захватывает территории, грустит без внимания и крайне свободолюбив.
Когда переехал ко мне от бабули, в двух горшках суммарно был длиннее 10 метров. Сейчас уже оккупировал две комнаты и стал полноценным членом семьи.
В двадцатых числах июня случилась трагедия: плеть, которая жила в спальне, оборвалась. Сказать, что дом был наполнен страданием — значит сильно преуменьшить масш…
Вернулись со спектакля Иры и Матвея.
Моё внимание несложно зацепить. Но очень сложно удержать. У ребят получилось.
На сцене был женский коллектив, играющий мальчишек из «Республики ШКИД». Не было ни гендера,ни пола, ни потолка, была только история, азарт, уличная свобода, детская жестокость и невероятная жажда быть принятым.
Получилось жить внутри происходящего, невероятная ценность на все времена.
Спасибо за этот …
ИИ никогда не заменит человека.
Сейчас готовим День тигра в музее. Сижу над афишей. Верстаю, двигаю, выравниваю. Получается... ну, скажем так, искренне.
Отдаю макет ИИ. Через минуту он вернул такую афишу, что захотелось сделать вид, будто это сразу была моя идея.
И тут одна маленькая деталь. Логотип музея он, конечно же, заменил на свой. Потому что не знает, что у каждого логотипа есть история, люди и смысл.
Хоро…
Дорогие друзья!
Театральный коллектив «Последниеа правки»
приглашает на предпоказ нового спектакля «ШКИДа!» от моих любимых творческих!
4 июля, 19.30
Старая Басманная, 21/4, 2 этаж (актовый зал)
Какой он — ребенок 1920–х гг.?
О чем он мечтает и чего боится?
На что он способен в условиях переходной эпохи?
На эти вопросы мы стараемся ответить в нашей постановке
Авторы пьесы по мотивам повести Л. Пантелеева и Г. Бе…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @proalfredy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 28 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПроДвижение по наклонной” (@proalfredy), 301 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proalfredy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.