Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ProАгро Лекторий

Channel

ProАгро Лекторий

@proagro_lectoriy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

815subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002674040244
TypeChannel
Username@proagro_lectoriy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/proagro_lectoriy

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8158438297 August 2026 — 843 subscribers8 August 2026 — 843 subscribers14 August 2026 — 840 subscribers21 August 2026 — 837 subscribers28 August 2026 — 831 subscribers4 September 2026 — 827 subscribers12 September 2026 — 825 subscribers25 September 2026 — 817 subscribers6 October 2026 — 815 subscribers7 August 20266 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 60 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 811–847 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 15:59815-2
25 Sept 2026, 21:41817-8
12 Sept 2026, 04:18825-2
4 Sept 2026, 10:58827-4
28 Aug 2026, 23:38831-6
21 Aug 2026, 09:55837-3
14 Aug 2026, 19:34840-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:20843no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:54843first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3667.9%
🔥815.1%
👏47.55%
😍23.77%
👍11.89%
😁11.89%
🤝11.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC61 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А КАК Я ТЕБЯ УЗНАЮ? Замечали, что студенты разных специальностей приобретают профдеформацию уже во время учебы? 🤔 Например, ваш друг программист, который изначально хотел просто заказать пиццу, а в итоге начал изучать код сайта ресторана и нашёл там кучу ошибок. Или подруга с факультета журналистики, которая разбирает постановку вопроса в интервью медийной личности. Замечали такие профессиональные особенности у се…

❤3🔥2👏1

5 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC86 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какое утверждение ЛОЖНОЕ? 📚

  1. NDVI различает каждую культуру по виду35%
  2. NDVI измеряет фотосинтетически активную биомассу30%
  3. NDVI = (NIR - RED) / (NIR + RED)25%
  4. Высокая «вариативность NDVI» означает, что поле неоднозначно10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤3🔥1😍1

5 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC159 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ловушка NDVI 🤭 Анализ и чтение гистограмм — не самый лёгкий навык аграриев. Один снимок может увести не туда, если верить картинке, а не понимать цифры, которые за ней стоят. Как отличить рост культуры от сорняков, заметить скрытые полосы и не попасть на «вариативность», которая иногда пытается нас запутать? Все ответы — в лекции «Индексы вегетации и их применение».

❤5👍1👏1

3 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC99 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Карьерный путь из дома 😋 Лекции, тесты, карьерные треники, рейтинг и личный кабинет — всё это инструменты для твоего роста. Если ты ещё не разобрался, как устроено обучение, изучи карточки в карусели и присоединяйся к нам в Лекторий 💚

❤5🔥1😁1

27 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC166 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какое утверждение НЕ верно?

  1. Состав золы невозможно предсказать заранее — он зависит от вида и возраста растения22%
  2. Китайцы придумали «навоз без скота» — компост из трав, золы и ила со дна каналов15%
  3. Римляне собирали 15 ц/га — в разы больше, чем средневековая Европа спустя 1000 лет26%
  4. Подсечно-огневое земледелие — доисторический метод, исчезнувший тысячи лет назад37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤4👏1🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC142 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как удобрение могло уничтожить целую цивилизацию? 🔥 Представьте: вы — жрец майя. От вашего расчёта зависит, когда сжечь лес под посевы. Ошибёшься на пару дней — сезон дождей потушит огонь, и племя останется без еды. Вот так первое минеральное удобрение, зола, стало и спасением, и проклятием. И это только один факт из новой лекции, где мы разобрали всю историю древней агрономии: 🌱 какое удобрение появилось раньше н…

❤4👏1🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC106 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

БЕСПЛАТНЫЕ КУРСЫ PROАГРО Лектория Каникулы — идеальное время растить не только картошку, но и компетенции. На нашей платформе: короткие модули, практика на кейсах АПК и сертификаты в портфолио — всё, что любит ваш будущий работодатель. Свежее и теперь бесплатно: 🍃 «Специалист по благоустройству и озеленению территорий» 🍃 «Применение пастушьих собак в ЛПХ и фермерских хозяйствах» А ещё: 🍃 «Начинающий пчеловод» 🍃…

❤5🔥1🤝1

22 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC134 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ВЫБЕРИ ПЕРСОНАЖА А что, если бы мы запустили агро-игру со своими персонажами? За кого бы ты сыграл? 🎮

❤7🔥1😍1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @proagro_lectoriy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz20 voters

Какое утверждение ЛОЖНОЕ? 📚

  1. NDVI различает каждую культуру по виду35%
  2. NDVI измеряет фотосинтетически активную биомассу30%
  3. NDVI = (NIR - RED) / (NIR + RED)25%
  4. Высокая «вариативность NDVI» означает, что поле неоднозначно10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTCAnonymous Quiz27 voters

Какое утверждение НЕ верно?

  1. Состав золы невозможно предсказать заранее — он зависит от вида и возраста растения22%
  2. Китайцы придумали «навоз без скота» — компост из трав, золы и ила со дна каналов15%
  3. Римляне собирали 15 ц/га — в разы больше, чем средневековая Европа спустя 1000 лет26%
  4. Подсечно-огневое земледелие — доисторический метод, исчезнувший тысячи лет назад37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ProАгро Лекторий” (@proagro_lectoriy), 815 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proagro_lectoriy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.