Channel
@pro_rentgen
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
405subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001538100056 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pro_rentgen |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pro_rentgen |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 23:01 | 405 | -3 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 408 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 405 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 407 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:19 | 408 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 412 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 412 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
34 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 13 | 38.2% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 26.5% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 11.8% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| custom 5285225877867617126 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.94% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Выбирайте свой вариант в опросе ⬇️
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Опачки... Уже август! ☀️ Кажется, лето проходит быстрее, чем календарь успевает перелистывать страницы. Кто-то уже успел съездить в отпуск и набраться сил, кто-то только собирает чемодан, а кто-то проводит это лето в привычном рабочем ритме. Предлагаем провести небольшую перекличку и узнать, с каким настроением вы вошли в август. ⬇️
Почему инженеры не перестают учиться? Технологии меняются быстрее, чем когда-либо. Каждый год появляются новые материалы, программы и способы разработки. Поэтому диплом для инженера — не финишная прямая, а только начало большого пути. Разбираемся, почему учёба становится частью профессии. На нашем внутреннем портале обучения iSpring уже есть такие курсы как: 🤩Excel. Макросы; 🤩Как проводить встречи "один на один"; 🤩…
🔥4custom 52852258778676171261
Почему на рентгене кости белые, а лёгкие тёмные? Каждый хотя бы раз видел рентгеновский снимок. Но задумывались ли вы, почему кости на нём почти белые, лёгкие — тёмные, а остальные ткани находятся где-то между ними? 🤔 Разбираемся вместе. ⬆️⬆️⬆️ #электрон_познавательно
🔥8👏2💯1
Время «перезагрузки» 🔋 Раскрываем карты! Правильный ответ в нашем опросе — номер 2. Давайте разберемся. ❌ Миф №1: Смена деятельности. Если вы переключились с одной сложной задачи на другую (даже «интересную и полезную»), ваш префронтальный кортекс продолжает работать на износ. Это не отдых, а просто другой вид нагрузки. ✅ Правда №2: Польза безделья. Когда мы «витаем в облаках» или просто смотрим в окно, включается…
👍4❤2😎2
Posted without readable text
🤔2
Проверка на прочность… или на отдых? 🔋 Мы привыкли подходить к задачам с инженерной точностью. Но умеем ли мы так же точно восстанавливать свой главный ресурс — внимание? Давайте проверим наши знания о софт-скиллах и продуктивности. Перед вами три утверждения, и только одно из них — ПРАВДА. 1️⃣ Лучший отдых — это смена деятельности. (Например, почитать профессиональную статью сразу после написания кода). 2️⃣ Безде…
👍1🔥1
Кем бы вы стали в мире будущего?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤔1
Эволюция профессий. Исторический экскурс 📜 Мир технологий никогда не стоит на месте, и это захватывающий процесс! То, что вчера казалось фантастикой, сегодня становится стандартом, а некоторые профессии уходят в историю, уступая место еще более интересным специальностям. Давайте заглянем в «цифровую летопись» и посмотрим, как трансформировался рынок труда. ⬆️ И хотя технологии становятся всё умнее, за каждым важны…
👍4🤔1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @pro_rentgen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Выбирайте свой вариант в опросе ⬇️
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Кем бы вы стали в мире будущего?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Электрон: Look inside” (@pro_rentgen), 405 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pro_rentgen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.