3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 120–121 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 16:22
120
-1
9 Aug 2026, 03:46
121
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:09
121
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 6 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
104 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
37
35.6%
❤
36
34.6%
🍾
11
10.6%
👍
6
5.77%
⚡
5
4.81%
❤🔥
5
4.81%
custom 5224257782013769471
3
2.88%
😍
1
0.962%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2024 to 7 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Forwarded from @nadi_astrostrategiya_li4nostiPhoto
ИЩУ 4 ДЕВУШЕК НА ЛИЧНЫЙ РАЗБОР
Если вы чувствуете, что стоите на месте — в доходах, реализации или энергии — прочитайте внимательно.
Я ищу 4 девушек, которым сделаю личный разбор по вашему запросу и покажу, где сейчас блокируется ваш рост
⭐️ Девушка, которая много делает, но деньги не растут
Вы стараетесь, работаете, но ощущение, что потенциал намного больше. Нет чёткого понимания — куда идти и на чём масштабирова…
Черная пятница 😍
Что ты получишь на распродаже: 50% скидки на любую консультацию!
💭 Если хотелось давно, но откладывала, то сегодня точно можно себе это позволить, обращаться сюда: @one_purpose
#астрология
Forwarded from @nadi_astrostrategiya_li4nostiPhoto
Разбор натальной карты
Меняюсь я и мои консультации
Я пошла в максимальную честность со Вселенной, занялась оформлением активной ссылки на оплату консультаций и подписки в закрытый канал
А чтобы её сделать, я обратилась к порталу prodamus. И от них пришел запрос с формулировкой:
«Просим предоставить подробное описанием спектра Ваших услуг, за которые Вы планируете принимать оплаты»
И я поняла, что этим надо подел…
Тема финансов с точки зрения астрологии?
Ответы на вопросы рубрики #задайвопросастрологу
❓Вопрос от Ирина
Здравствуйте)
Как нащупать у себя тему финансов с точки зрения астрологии?
Какой путь выбрать?
В какую сторону смотреть, чтобы реализоваться в карьере?
Ну в общем деньги 💰 и карьера 😁
Гольф — новый жесткий люкс
Летом подарили сертификат на 1 час обучения гольфу с тренером и только сегодня удалось им использоваться
Ехали по трассе, а время в пути все увеличилось и увеличилось. Черные тучи на небе и муж давай тут причитать, что сейчас пойдет дождь ☔️ и ничего не получится — я теперь всегда говорю: «все сложится для меня наилучшим образом» — исполнено ✅
Приехали — припарковались у входа
Опоздали н…
МИЛЛИАРД — оборот её бизнесов
Прилетел заказ на разбор натальной карты от бизнесвумен. Её масштаб поражает мой мозг до глубины души — оборот её компаний целый гребанный МИЛЛИАРД.
Единственное место, где я сталкивалась с этой суммой только сериал «BILLIONS»
26.09 начался новый большой этап в моей жизни, который разделил мое сознание на ДО и ПОСЛЕ (я буду с вами делиться)
Именно новые энергии перемен послужили толчк…
🔥14🍾5⚡4❤3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @pro_proastrology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@pro_proastrology named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@nadi_ivanovaa named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PRO Астрологию” (@pro_proastrology), 120 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pro_proastrology.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
