9 measurements spanning 19 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,857–4,874 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 06:57
4,872
+5
23 Aug 2026, 08:33
4,867
+2
20 Aug 2026, 00:18
4,865
+1
16 Aug 2026, 22:05
4,864
-2
13 Aug 2026, 15:47
4,866
+7
10 Aug 2026, 17:41
4,859
-8
7 Aug 2026, 22:04
4,867
+2
7 Aug 2026, 11:00
4,865
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:59
4,865
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 4,872 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,030
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
26 (18 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
15,402
Reactions total
348
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11m 07s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
783 reactions across 26 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
257
32.8%
👍
254
32.4%
❤
108
13.8%
🤣
53
6.77%
👏
42
5.36%
😁
19
2.43%
👀
18
2.30%
❤🔥
16
2.04%
🤔
5
0.639%
💘
4
0.511%
🤷♂
3
0.383%
🎄
1
0.128%
💔
1
0.128%
😱
1
0.128%
🤩
1
0.128%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 783reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 26 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pro_gitaru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Что за песня? Кто узнал, пишите в комментариях.
✔️ Табы и Разбор здесь
Привет. Я тебя очень ждал
Я ждал, когда город уснет
Когда опустеет вокзал
И время придет...
▶️ Смотреть полностью:
Youtube | Рутуб | Вконтакте
⭐️ Больше разборов на Boosty
Пластилиновая ворона (зарисовка)
✔️ Аккорды здесь
Одну простую сказку, а может, и не сказку,
А может, не простую хотим вам рассказать.
Ее мы помним с детства, а может, и не с детства,
А может, и не помним, но будем вспоминать.
▶️ Исполнение на стриме:
Youtube | Рутуб | Вконтакте | Дзен
Корнелюк - Город которого нет (разбор в Am)
💎 Полная версия и разбор на Бусти
Стояла задача подобрать аккомпанемент для песни "Город которого нет" для тональности Am (чтобы петь было проще и возможно играть).
Тaм для мeня гopит oчaг,
Кaк вeчный знaк зaбытыx иcтин.
Мнe дo нeгo пocлeдний шaг,
И этoт шaг длиннee жизни.
▶️ Стрим под гитару - выпуск 291
СМОТРЕТЬ НА YOUTUBE >>>
СМОТРЕТЬ НА РУТУБЕ >>>
СМОТРЕТЬ ВКОНТАКТЕ >>>
СМОТРЕТЬ НА BOOSTY >>>
СМОТРЕТЬ НА TWITCH >>>
Стрим под гитару - любимые песни и общение в чате. Песни из любимых кинофильмов и мультфильмов, песни групп Король и шут, Кино, ДДТ, Ария, НАУ, ГО, Чиж, Чайф, Агата Кристи и другие популярные и непопулярные исполнители.
‼️ Начало трансляции в 20-00 МСК.
Заказать…
Louis Armstrong - Wonderful World (кавер)
🎵 Табулатура для гитары
The colors of the rainbow, so pretty in the sky
Are also on the faces, of people going by
I see friends shaking hands, sayin', "How do you do?"
They're really sayin', "I love you"...
👀 Смотреть полностью:
Youtube | Рутуб | Вконтакте | Дзен
Боярский - Ап! (зарисовка)
✔️ Аккорды здесь
Ап! И тигры у ног моих сели.
Ап! И с лестниц в глаза мне глядят.
Ап! И кружатся на карусели
Ап! И в обруч горящий летят...
👀 Исполнение со стрима:
Youtube | Дзен
R.E.M. - Losing My Religion (вступление)
📌 Табы вступления и аккорды
I thought that I heard you laughing
I thought that I heard you sing
I think I thought I saw you try...
⭐️ Курс для начинающих гитаристов
🔥20👍9❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @pro_gitaru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
⁉️ Давайте проверим все ли у вас идет по плану? Тест по группе Гражданская оборона.
Егор Летов родился в:
Новосибирске22%
Омске59%
Томске13%
Барнауле7%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Гитара с нуля @konograi · 125,406 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Блог про гитару” (@pro_gitaru), 4,872 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pro_gitaru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.