Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Никитина про ЕГЭ

@pro_englisch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

4,416subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001923397186
TypeChannel
Username@pro_englisch
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pro_englisch

Growth

4,4044,4164,4106 August 2026 — 4,412 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,412 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,410 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,404 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,416 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,402–4,418 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:384,416+12
10 Aug 2026, 06:464,404-6
7 Aug 2026, 15:304,410-2
6 Aug 2026, 22:454,412no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:394,412first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 4,416 subscribers
Avg views / post
703
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total7,026
Reactions total414
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

720 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
43159.9%
🔥13919.3%
🥰435.97%
🙈304.17%
👍263.61%
🤗101.39%
👏91.25%
😢91.25%
🤷‍♀81.11%
❤‍🔥50.694%
🙏50.694%
🤔50.694%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 720reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pro_englisch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTCviews —

Никитина про ЕГЭ pinned «Про марафон-предобучение для новичков Коллеги, если вы не знакомы или плохо знакомы с ЕГЭ, то вам сюда! Когда? 10-16 августа Где? Телеграм + Телебосс/Зум Как будет проходить? 📌Понедельник, среда и пятница - эфиры в Телебосс/Зум в 11:00. 📌Запись вебинара+…»

7 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC258 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Стоит ли проводить встречу по обзору обучений в этом учебном году, которые я буду проводить?

  1. Конечно, планирую на обучение20%
  2. Да, хочу просто понять, что мне подходит и подходит ли40%
  3. Нет, я просто читаю канал40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5

Signed Мария Никитина. ЕГЭ эксперт

6 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC357 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Про марафон 📌Как ни странно, на марафон заходят участники, которые уже начали или даже вовсю готовят студентов к ЕГЭ🤷‍♀ 📌Я то вообще задумывала марафон именно для новичков, чтобы шаг за шагом пройти с ними первый этап погружения в этот экзамен. Но и более опытные коллеги приходят. Почему? Как мне кажется, тут несколько причин: 1️⃣кому-то хочется знать ЕГЭ со всех сторон: а тут вам и опыт коллег с учебными пособи

7🔥4❤‍🔥1🥰1

Signed Мария Никитина. ЕГЭ эксперт

5 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC403 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Про марафон-предобучение для новичков Коллеги, если вы не знакомы или плохо знакомы с ЕГЭ, то вам сюда! Когда? 10-16 августа Где? Телеграм + Телебосс/Зум Как будет проходить? 📌Понедельник, среда и пятница - эфиры в Телебосс/Зум в 11:00. 📌Запись вебинара+ презентацию к нему выкладываю в чат в телеграм. 📌 После каждого вебинара будет домашнее задание практического характера (выполнять не обязательно, но желательн

10🔥5🥰3

Signed Мария Никитина. ЕГЭ эксперт

3 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC545 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Методический курс по подготовке к ЕГЭ 4.0 открывает свои двери для всех, кто хочет в этом году наконец-то перестать ➡️ отказываться от выращенных упорным трудом учеников, ➡️отказываться от стабильного и высокого заработка и мотивированных студентов ➡️готовиться к 100500 разным студентам по 500 разным программам СТАРТУЕМ 24 августа! ‼️Подробности прикрепляю в комментариях! 📌Если вы вдруг не уверены или хотите

10🔥8🥰6❤‍🔥4

Signed Мария Никитина. ЕГЭ эксперт

31 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC708 views64 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Больше пособий - выше балл? В начале своего пути так я и думала. Накачала кучу учебников, брала кусочек оттуда, кусочек отсюда, вообще слабо себе понимая, как именно и зачем это все пригодится на экзамене. Но было ощущение, что надо впихнуть всего, и побольше🙈 Мой девиз был: Чем больше слов мы выучим, тем лучше! ❌А получалось как-то не так: пособий становилось все больше, лексики и домашки тоже, ученики стонали

41🔥12👍11

Signed Мария Никитина. ЕГЭ эксперт

29 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC714 views68 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Позавчера я сделала это! - отважилась на парасейлинг ( вот как оказывается это называется) Было страшно решиться - это ничего не сказать 🙀 Но потом я подумала, что это мой последний день в Турции (ждите скоро фотоотчет), и кто знает, как сложатся наши дальнейшие отношения с отпуском на море? Если бы не попробовала - точно бы себя корила как минимум полгода. Перед тем, как решиться, я прошла несколько стадий внутр

41🔥19👍8

Signed Мария Никитина. ЕГЭ эксперт

24 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC982 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А что бы я сделала иначе, если бы сегодня снова начинала готовить к ЕГЭ с нуля? Вот такая мысль мне пришла в голову после прошлого поста и ваших комментариев... Точно не стала бы ждать, пока почувствую себя полностью готовой. Но три вещи я бы сделала обязательно. 1️⃣Сначала разобралась бы со всей структурой экзамена и какие стратегии нужно применять, чтобы успешно справляться с ЕГЭ. 2️⃣ Нашла бы людей, с которым

37🔥10👍7

Signed Мария Никитина. ЕГЭ эксперт

22 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC949 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я хорошо помню своих первых учеников, которых готовила к ЕГЭ. 📅Это было в школе.Сразу две группы.И в одной из них были мальчишки, которые уже сдали CAE и были уверены, что знают английский лучше всех.😏 📚Я уже проходила обучение экспертов на тот момент и +- понимала, как устроен экзамен. 🧩Но если честно, мне было очень страшно🙈 ‼️НО!!! В меня поверили. Завуч доверил эти группы. Старшие коллеги поддержали. Муж гов

31🔥17👏6

Signed Мария Никитина. ЕГЭ эксперт

20 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC≈1,010 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему многие хорошие преподаватели годами откладывают подготовку к ЕГЭ Каждый год я вижу одну и ту же историю ⬇️⬇️⬇️ ✅Преподаватель прекрасно знает язык. ✅Умеет объяснять сложные темы. ✅Ученики рекомендуют его знакомым. ❌Но как только разговор заходит о подготовке к ЕГЭ, звучит почти одинаковая фраза: «Наверное, я пока не готова брать таких учеников». Меня всегда цепляет именно слово «пока». Потому что очень част

27🥰10🤷‍♀8🙏2

Signed Мария Никитина. ЕГЭ эксперт

17 Jul 2026, 06:52 UTC≈1,100 views63 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

+16 баллов за 5 занятий Коллеги, дюспешу поделиться радостной новостью: девочка, с которой готовились к пересдаче, пересдала на 94!!! Очень рада за нее (уверена, что и ваши ❤️ в предыдущих постах про Ксюше очень помогли 🤗) Анамнез: Школа с углубленным изучением английского, уровень где-то В1+, курсы подготовки (отзывалась не очень). 📝Мы до этого не занимались, так что первым делом я попросила посмотреть разбалло

39🔥22👏2

Signed Мария Никитина. ЕГЭ эксперт

15 Jul 2026, 07:33 UTC≈1,160 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

‼️ РАЗЫСКИВАЕТСЯ ЧЕЛОВЕК С БРИТАНСКОЙ ВИЗОЙ У коллеги подвисла группа детей, которые едут в Англию в лагерь на две недели. Уже все оплачено: билеты, еда, проживание, и даже дадут небольшую ЗП. Даты: 18.07-1.08 Можно писать сразу Екатерине @kate_mb Груп-лидер, найдись🙏

10🙏3

Signed Мария Никитина. ЕГЭ эксперт

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pro_englisch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTCAnonymous Poll40 voters

Стоит ли проводить встречу по обзору обучений в этом учебном году, которые я буду проводить?

  1. Конечно, планирую на обучение20%
  2. Да, хочу просто понять, что мне подходит и подходит ли40%
  3. Нет, я просто читаю канал40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTCAnonymous Poll136 voters

Хотите календарный план разных обучений в одном месте на год?

  1. Да82%
  2. Нет4%
  3. Я просто тык14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 356,103 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Никитина про ЕГЭ” (@pro_englisch), 4,416 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pro_englisch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.