Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 36 days, net -100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,312–1,442 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 17:22
1,327
-1
14 Sept 2026, 09:18
1,328
-3
11 Sept 2026, 05:18
1,331
-5
6 Sept 2026, 02:16
1,336
-9
2 Sept 2026, 06:03
1,345
-13
30 Aug 2026, 09:24
1,358
-62
27 Aug 2026, 04:13
1,420
-1
20 Aug 2026, 17:13
1,421
-5
17 Aug 2026, 11:28
1,426
-1
14 Aug 2026, 06:59
1,427
no change
13 Aug 2026, 19:32
1,427
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
53 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
16
30.2%
❤
15
28.3%
😍
9
17.0%
👍
7
13.2%
🥰
4
7.55%
🤔
1
1.89%
🤯
1
1.89%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 6 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @priyatnofeya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Как монетизировать одну большую идею и превратить её в контент-систему | 2 часть
К сожалению, самоинтересующиеся клиенты — это роскошь для тех, кто не создает пространство куда пойти дальше и бегает за заявками самостоятельно, — зато базовый минимум тех, кто просто за счет контента и прямых призывов сам контролирует свой доход и его объём.
3️⃣Другие площадки
Большое исследование можно адаптировать под разные форма…
Как монетизировать одну большую идею и превратить её в контент-систему | 1 часть
Здесь важно подчеркнуть: контент не должен бесконечно дублироваться. Мы не копируем статью 20 раз. Мы достаём из неё разные смыслы и адаптируем их под механику каждой площадки.
Настоящий контент-маркетинг — когда тебе не надо изъ*бываться и каждый раз придумывать что-то заново, а когда ты через разные смыслы подтверждаешь свою ключевую…
Более 35 часов я писала статью про Майкла Джексона 🤯
И она уже ждёт вас тут 🤌🏻
И, кажется, это одна из самых необычных моих работ
Я проштудировала десятки англоязычных и русскоязычных материалов, интервью, биографий, разборов, документальных фильмов и исследований — и не нашла ничего, что смотрело бы на его историю именно так
Я рассматривала Майкла одновременно как:
🤮человека, у которого собственное «я» будто ра…
💌
Благодарю за доверите тех, кто остается и за ваши голоса! Безумно приятно и мотивирует продолжать!
Вернулись только что с семьёй из деревни, уезжали на целый день помогать и ухаживать за садом, так что была без связи, а тут такие приятные изменения! 🥰
Всё-таки, честно признаюсь, покупка другого канала, какой бы я не была увереный в себе маркетолог, это достаточно волнующее событие, требующее много энергии и влож…
Сейчас пишу новую про Майкла Джексона и как выстраивался его пиар94%
И есть неопубликованная про Ваню Дмитриенко25%
Своё предложение в лс0%
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как генерить бесконечное количество идей для контента?
❇️ используя ИИ
❇️ без сложных промтов и топорных ответов
❇️ чтобы получались идеи, которые отражают вас на 10000%
Листай 💕
Ещё немного моих принципов:
*️⃣Выделять время именно на мышление
Я не использую диалог с ИИ между делом, а выделяю на это конкретное время в графике.
Нам часто кажется:
«Я сейчас быстренько напишу пост, оформлю, а потом выложу, и ещё в…
🔥5❤2🥰2🤔1😍1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @priyatnofeya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сейчас пишу новую про Майкла Джексона и как выстраивался его пиар94%
И есть неопубликованная про Ваню Дмитриенко25%
Своё предложение в лс0%
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
piaceim • пресеты & блогинг @piaceimpresets · 126,236 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
Не pov, а reels @reels_by_piaceim · 43,221 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
mycosmicluv @mycosmicluv_blog · 60,777 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
очень по-женски @mashkutovaa · 23,637 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ФЕЯ” (@priyatnofeya), 1,327 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/priyatnofeya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.