Channel
@privateai_ann
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,541subscribers
-272 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001889458595 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @privateai_ann |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/privateai_ann |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 5,541 | -89 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 5,630 | -22 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:35 | 5,652 | -23 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 5,675 | -17 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 5,692 | -24 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 5,716 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 5,725 | -13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 5,738 | -22 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 5,760 | -20 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 5,780 | -16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 5,796 | -14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:41 | 5,810 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 5,813 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:09 | 5,813 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
56 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 29 | 51.8% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 33.9% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 8.93% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 3.57% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.79% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🛡Privacy in PrivateAI is focused on what happens before a trade reaches the blockchain To prepare a cross-chain trade, a trader may use a token tracker for research, a bridge to compare routes, a DEX to check liquidity, a separate tool for gas and slippage, and a wallet for approvals. Each interaction creates another place where the trader’s activity can be observed. The Thing brings token data, route planning, quo…
🔥2❤1
🗓 Weekly Recap | Jul 27 — Aug 2 🟠How The Thing turns fragmented research into one execution flow 🟠The MiCA grace period ended with over 80% of European crypto firms still unlicensed 🟠Cross-chain limit orders and TP/SL showed why advanced execution is still difficult to manage manually 🟠Switching between tabs creates a hidden cost in lost context, slower decisions, and missed opportunities 🟠Three cross-chain prot…
❤1
👀 What if cross-chain was built into the terminal – but never hidden from the trader? CoinDesk recently reported that several Bitcoin- and Ethereum-linked protocols lost more than $35 million in the space of a few hours. The underlying chains were not compromised, the problems were found elsewhere: contract logic, administrative permissions and private keys. This is what makes cross-chain infrastructure difficult t…
🔥2✍1
➡️ Say you want to use USDC on Ethereum to buy a token on Solana First, you check the quote. Then you open a bridge, look for the right pool on the destination chain, compare fees, check the token address and return to your wallet to approve the transaction. By then, the original quote may be outdated. Gas may have changed, the destination pool may be too shallow, or the slippage setting may be different from the o…
🔥2
☄️ Limit orders and TP/SL need more than a price target For an arbitrage trader, the hard part is not only finding the opportunity, but knowing whether the route can actually hold. Before the trade goes on-chain, chain selection, bridge delay, pool depth, gas, slippage, fees, wallet approval and exit conditions all have to line up. And if those checks live in separate tools, the strategy starts depending on tab swi…
✍2🔥2
📰 Europe’s MiCA grace period is over According to ESMA, unauthorised crypto service providers should stop onboarding new EU clients and begin winding down affected activities. ⚡️For users, this may mean additional identity checks and changes in access to centralized platforms. The Thing operates before execution: helping users review signals, compare routes and understand what they expose before signing a transact…
🔥2✍1❤1🤝1
🛠 Signal → Route → Signature is the core workflow behind The Thing A token starts moving, but execution is not the first question. Context is. What changed? Where is the signal coming from? Is the move supported by volume, social velocity or on-chain behavior, or is it just noise moving through the feed? ✔️ The Thing starts with signal review, then opens the route layer: chain in, chain out, liquidity, fees, slipp…
🔥2❤1
🗓 Weekly Recap | Jul 20 — Jul 26 🟠$175M in ETH from the KelpDAO exploit was tracked in real time across three transactions 🟠Core Terminal’s Watchlist brings the assets you follow into one focused view 🟠The Trading Dashboard turns market signals into a clearer decision-making workflow 🟠Allbridge Core paused its bridge following a $1.65M exploit 🟠Is there anything left to build in crypto? More than the market narr…
❤1
🤖 Is there anything left to build in crypto? Absolutely. Wintermute’s post gets the bigger picture right: new products will emerge where financial rails, autonomy, and trust meet. Before the industry works out how autonomous agents can transact safely, we still need to solve this for people. A public wallet can reveal positions, transaction history, connections, and patterns of behavior. That makes users easier to …
🔥3
☄️ Allbridge Core paused its bridge after a $1.65M exploit The incident hit Allbridge Core’s Solana deployment, where an attacker reportedly used a Kamino flash loan to manipulate USDC/USDT pool ratios and move stolen funds from Solana to Ethereum. For memecoin traders, an incident like this creates a very practical problem. Most traders do not keep liquidity on every chain. When an opportunity appears on another …
🔥3✍1
🧠 Every trade needs memory TheThing keeps entry, exit, holding status, trade history, daily PnL and cumulative PnL close to the trading workflow, so performance context stays visible after the action is taken. A cleaner workspace for tracking what happened and preparing what comes next. TheThing core terminal is coming... ⭐ PrivateAI ecosystem is powered by $PGPT 🔗 privateai.com Discord | Telegram Chat | Twitte…
🔥3❤1
👀 A watchlist should be more than a passive list of tokens TheThing turns market monitoring into a working surface: volume views, token context, filters, quick actions and live movement inside one terminal. Built for traders who need to scan faster without losing execution context. TheThing core terminal is coming... ⭐ PrivateAI ecosystem is powered by $PGPT 🔗 privateai.com Discord | Telegram Chat | Twitter l …
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @privateai_ann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PrivateAI.com / PGPT Announcement” (@privateai_ann), 5,541 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/privateai_ann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.