Channel
@priutsolntsevomoscow
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
984subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001700804533 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @priutsolntsevomoscow |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/priutsolntsevomoscow |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 984 | +10 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 974 | +5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 969 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 975 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 974 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 975 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 974 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 974 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
258 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 196 | 76.0% | |
| 💔 | 14 | 5.43% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 3.88% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 3.49% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 3.10% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 2.71% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.94% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 1.55% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.16% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 0.775% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 258 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как воспринимать отказ волонтёра в собаке из приюта❓ Представьте картину. Вы настроились на великую миссию: спасти собаку от суровых будней приюта. Вдохновились постами в соцсетях, купили самый красивый поводок (красный, с блестящей клипсой), мысленно уже поменяли кличку и даже прикинули, как будете хвастаться перед друзьями своим благородством. Вы едете в приют с лицом человека, готового обнять весь мир или звонит…
❤17
Полгода назад у Янтаря была на нашем канале дебютная статья. Если вы её сейчас перечитаете, то последующие события, о которых мы расскажем сегодня, будут восприниматься проникновеннее. 📍Пёс скрывается от алиментов в приюте: https://dzen.ru/a/aXfZ5J1aeHXadilj Он - пёс с историей из прошлого! У него была свобода, у него была охота. А потом Янтарь попал в приют. Держался независимо. Не был труслив, не был агрессивен, …
❤31💔12😢8
Зефир (белый) - дикий пёсик, до сих пор не дается гладить себя, про ошейник и поводок сделал официальное заявление волонтёрам - «Не согласен». Волонтёрам пришлось принять ноту протеста и затаиться на время Но посмотрите-ка на эту сладкую парочку. Пока волонтёры долго запрягают - Куба взяла инициативу в свои лапы и решила социализировать Зефира) Игротерапия кстати отличная методика. А мы думаем, кто научил пугливого …
❤26❤🔥7🥰3
Очень пугливые малыши. Будем пытаться вдохнуть в них жизнь. #я_тебя_боюсь
❤20🙏9
У каждого приюта есть своя легенда💬 Собака, которая взломала систему. У нас это Банти и его первая дата отлова в официальных бумагах значится 2020 годом. Но глядя на него сейчас, можно с уверенностью сказать — молодым он не был уже тогда. Единственное, что мы знаем наверняка благодаря маленькой детали — пластиковой бирке на ухе — этот парень уже бывал в системе. ⚡️А потом случился второй дубль. Очередной отлов, наш…
❤35👏5
Это Ави, очень непростая собака. 🐾До того, как она попала к нам в ряд, она дважды убегала из отлова, ее возвращали. Но однажды Ави убежала из приюта. Несколько месяцев жила рядом с приютом, волонтеры ее подкармливали, но поймать ее не получалось, она просчитывала все наши попытки ее вернуть в приют, как они это делают, уму не постижимо. Но чем собака хитрее, тем больше азарта, это факт. Долго наблюдали за Ави, присм…
❤40⚡4💔2
Почему собака из приюта может сбежать из нового дома? Пристройство в частные дома Горькая правда для будущих хозяев, а так же для волонтеров, кто пристраивает собаку в новый дом. Вы живёте за городом, в СНТ или деревне. У вас большой участок, забор по периметру, и вы решили, что это идеальное место для собаки из приюта. Вы звоните куратору и представляете картину: пёс радостно бегает по травке днём, а ночью преданн…
❤27🔥10👍2
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @priutsolntsevomoscow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“☀️ Приют СОЛНЦЕВО ☀️” (@priutsolntsevomoscow), 984 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/priutsolntsevomoscow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.