Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Printer Room

@printinglikeajeet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

27subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001590325228
TypeChannel
Username@printinglikeajeet
DescriptionMake the money, don’t let the money make you
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/printinglikeajeet

Growth

277 August 2026 — 27 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26–28 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 07:1627no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:3927first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 13 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
44
Videos
11
Links
239

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍327.3%
218.2%
🔥218.2%
🫡218.2%
😭19.09%
🥱19.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2024 to 14 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jul 2024, 08:31 UTC118 viewsread 11 August 2026

they're trying to shake us out lol faggots we can stay irrational longer than you can stay liquid

5 Jul 2024, 08:31 UTC119 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuru

JUST IN: $110 million liquidated from the cryptocurrency market in the past 60 minutes. @WatcherGuru

4 Jul 2024, 15:51 UTC84 viewsread 11 August 2026

I can’t believe Gary Gensler allowed me to invest in such a fraudulent market. He approved all the ETFs and made me believe what I was investing in was legitimate. All I wanted was some direction and protection from the SEC. This is not my fault. This is Gary’s fault.

4 Jul 2024, 09:10 UTC68 viewsread 11 August 2026

Overall crypto market rekt today. TON down 8%, TON shitters down 30%+… sometimes the frothiness is a good sign of a local top (useless garbage launching on gaspump, stop buying those) Now we see out of all these launches who will stay after seeing a bit of red. Keep an eye on the ones still building. Have an entry in mind or slowly DCA if you have powder. Don’t get rekt selling the bottom though 🤔

4 Jul 2024, 07:21 UTC61 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Buying the stuff people don't want... yet 🤔 Froth levels on TON are pretty high with volume not budging that much. Frustration for holders of OG coins and stickers are quite high - it's understandable. All these new people talking about TON, bridging to TON, why are my coins down 80%?! 😡 If you're a believer of the sticker/OG meta, it might be time to start licking your lips. Top buyers are starting to sell, top se

3 Jul 2024, 08:09 UTC50 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

GM. Pls don’t waste your TON funding scammy unimaginative sol jeets launching on gaspump. If you see the odd cool one that will have a team pushing ok then maybe roll the dice. But you need to be keeping your TON safe. The real money is in the dips of the solid projects. It’s tempting to gamble though I know these pumpfun clones get the dopamine going. Keep your TON safe it’s eight american dollars for one russian t

😭1

29 Jun 2024, 08:45 UTC72 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Greetings Esteemed Subscribers and Friends, In the ever-changing tapestry of time, our paths, like ancient rivers, twist and evolve, led by the unseen hands of destiny. It is with a spirit of deep reflection and profound gratitude that I cast this message into the winds of transformation. The winds of change have whispered through the corridors of my ventures, urging me onwards to new horizons and fresh endeavors.

2🫡2🥱1

28 Jun 2024, 22:36 UTC51 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🔥 Cupid Kitty [71.2K/108%] $CUPID 🌐 Ton @ Dedust 💰 USD: $0.00007116 💎 FDV: $71.2K 💬 TG | X 💦 Liq: $14.2K 🐡 [x10.1] 📊 Vol: $9K 🕰️ Age: 2mo ⛰️ ATH: $71.2K (now!) 📈 1H: 9.5% | $323.8 🅑 3 🅢 1 👥 TH: 11.6 | 5.2 | 4.7 | 3.1 | 3.0 [40%] 👪 Holders: 163 🧰 More: 📊 EQCnhLbPiAnHEV_Ld8CYPl6EMuHT60xWvXMAuKC7KV1XKyH_ APE | PRO | DEX | DT | GT | CA NOV | STK | OWA | DD | STON | TW 🏆 [anon] @ 3.4K 📈 20x 👀 136 🥷 NEW: Try Solana Grou

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @printinglikeajeet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Printer Room” (@printinglikeajeet), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/printinglikeajeet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.