Channel
@principlesoftafsir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
100subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002031221797 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @principlesoftafsir |
| Description | وما حوى الغاية في ألف سنة شخص فخذ من كل فن أحسنه بحفـظ متن جامع للراجح تأخذه على مفيـد الناصـح |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/principlesoftafsir |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 100 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:50 | 100 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 98 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 968 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
8 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Reports which we can verify: We care concerning the meanings here more than the chains of narrators. • If there are two different chains of narrators from the same narrator: • For example: - Ibn Abbas from Tareeq Ali ibn Abi Talha (very strong chain), - Ibn Abbas from Tareeq ad Dahhak (less than the one mentioned), - Ibn Abbas from Tareeq Ibn 'Awfi (weakest of the two mentioned above), Then we see the athaar/m…
Abdurrahman Nasir as Si'di's Tafsir gives no regard at all to the israeliyyaat. Ath Tha'labi's tafsir has Israeliyyaat which goes against the Shari'ah without verifying and criticising it.
Categorisation of Israeliyyaat 1) That which is in line with our Shari'ah- - The Qur'aan and Sunnah affirm it - Will be accepted from them - Example, the news from ahbar (the jew asking the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم about Allaah عز وجل placing the creations on His isba' (fingers) and the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم approved it by laughing.) 2) That which goes against the Shari'ah- - This is rejected - For examp…
There is mahallu niqash (topic of discussion amongst the scholars) in the topic of Israeliyyaat. Tafasir based on israeliyyaat- The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم said, ".....speak about/narrate from the people of Kitab, there is no harm in that...." From the dhahir of his صلى الله عليه وسلم statement, it shows permissibility for transmitting narrations from ahlul kitab. You cannot belie/reject it nor affirm it (bec…
An Example: The ayah, عينا يشرب بها عباد الله A spring from which the servants of Allaah drink (and by which they are fully quenched). Now, • Do you drink with the spring water? • Or from the spring water? • The kufiyyoon might say, that بها can be used in place of منها • The Basriyyoon said, there is tadmin here, that there is another proper verb here which is used with بها that is intended, So the hidden verb …
❤1
At Tadmin: by using one verb, we intend another verb that is not mentioned. When a verb is used with a preposition other than the one normally used with it, indicating that an additional meaning is intended. Benefit: Two Madhhabs in nahw: Basri 🏫 Kufi 🏫 - The difference between the basriyyoon and the kufiyyoon occurs. - Basriyyoon said, huruf al ma’ani does not replace each other's place.
❤1
If you find yourself trapped in strange sins that you never thought you would fall into, despite being a student of knowledge, the reason is one of two things: either you have abandoned the Qur'aan as your companion, or you have become heedless regarding Qiyaam al layl.
❤3
Difference between scholars of Tafsir and Hadith- Tafsir scholars say, we can take the athaar narrated by the scholars of Tafsir until we can prove it's weak. Scholars of hadith say, we don't accept anything until we accept it's authenticity.
❤1
When is there no linicnecy in Asaneed at Tafsir? - When the issue is not a matter of opinion. - If the content is munkar. (For eg. Might be in Aqeedah etc.) - If it goes against nass. - If it's ijma' qat'i. - When the narrations are contradicting. (ALL OF THIS, WE TALK ABOUT THEIR WEAKNESS IN THEIR DABT (MEMORY) AND NOT IN THEIR ADALAH (INTEGRITY). IF PROBLEM IS IN THEIR ADALAH THEN IT'S NOT ACCEPTED WHATSOEVE…
Maqatil ibn Sulayman, Shafi'i said about him, he is needed in Tafsir, but rejected and is strongly criticised by scholars of Hadith.
Reasons for Liniency in Asaneed at Tafsir Concept of Marwiyatu nusakh and Saheefah: Majority of the athaar is naskh (written)- when a large number of ahadith is present with only one chain or all of those ahadith to back to one chain. Muqarrar fi lugha: Some of the time, the ahadith are weak, but it's also supported by the Arabic language, so they are accepted. Own specialists in their field: Large number of narr…
Liniency in ASANEED AT TAFSIR When it comes to chain of Tafsir, there is some tolerance and linience. You shouldn't treat it like you treat the science of Hadith.
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @principlesoftafsir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 796,075 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hanbali School of Fiqh” (@principlesoftafsir), 100 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/principlesoftafsir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.