Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑙

Channel

𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑙

@princessofkittens

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

133subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003077887933
TypeChannel
Username@princessofkittens
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/princessofkittens

Growth

1321341337 August 2026 — 132 subscribers9 August 2026 — 132 subscribers15 August 2026 — 134 subscribers23 August 2026 — 132 subscribers30 August 2026 — 133 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 132–134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 18:24133+1
23 Aug 2026, 03:58132-2
15 Aug 2026, 16:25134+2
9 Aug 2026, 00:31132no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:24132first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
127.8%
avg views ÷ 133 subscribers
Avg views / post
170
1 post measured
Reaction rate
112.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (22 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total170
Reactions total192
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,821 reactions across 11 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 8.29% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54292753400589601282348.29%
custom 54451281545427869442047.23%
custom 53687087892875592982007.09%
custom 53661340294080506621856.56%
custom 53008820945184588651776.27%
custom 53684290022329967231766.24%
custom 53167472484433451841716.06%
custom 53687062251920857991314.64%
custom 53662982947272555871284.54%
custom 5366339049671927307832.94%
custom 5368523568822920000832.94%
custom 5368723941932177476812.87%
custom 5368371496915871520662.34%
custom 5327788716008166978622.20%
custom 5299002595354893909612.16%
custom 5301163934567388802551.95%
custom 5366507601368489110531.88%
custom 5357438979786417908511.81%
custom 5240281974282672122501.77%
custom 5352816211996465025501.77%
19 further kinds52018.4%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,821 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 11 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @princessofkittens. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC170 views192 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 536870878928755929899custom 542927534005896012834custom 536649637002901069132custom 53775658665503848897custom 54291002814869412977custom 54315827038645535857custom 53660669033641801926

1 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC335 views291 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 5429275340058960128120custom 536872394193217747656custom 536852356882292000053custom 536870878928755929821custom 537756586655038488913custom 543158270386455358513custom 54291002814869412979custom 53664963700290106916

26 Jul 2026, 19:07 UTC380 views145 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 542927534005896012867custom 543158270386455358529custom 536872394193217747625custom 536870878928755929824

26 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTC424 views285 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5368706225192085799113custom 536629829472725558763custom 536885363705961636348custom 536870878928755929815custom 536650760136848911012custom 519536554130855362111custom 538679055865404442610custom 53683348780247089929

20 Jul 2026, 05:21 UTC519 views182 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 536629829472725558765custom 536650760136848911041custom 536833487802470899239custom 536870622519208579912custom 54292753400589601289custom 51953655413085536218custom 53687087892875592988

17 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC540 views328 reactions4 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷 🤩 ʜᴀᴘᴘɪɴᴇss ɪs ɪɴ ᴛʜᴇ 🪦 🪦ʟɪᴛᴛʟᴇ ᴛʜɪɴɢs 🤩 🥰 🪦🌟🌟🪦 🥰 🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷

custom 5366134029408050662127custom 536837149691587152066custom 536633904967192730761custom 536870878928755929820custom 536852356882292000018custom 539096254815146084018custom 53867905586540444267custom 53687062251920857996

14 Jul 2026, 16:35 UTC507 views316 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⭐️𝑺𝒖𝒎𝒎𝒆𝒓 𝒊𝒏 𝒅𝒆𝒕𝒂𝒊𝒍⭐️

custom 5368429002232996723141custom 536613402940805066258custom 526035420329282788245custom 532778871600816697813custom 536633904967192730713custom 539096254815146084013custom 529888602135255610212custom 536870878928755929811

8 Jul 2026, 16:40 UTC549 views298 reactions4 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

☕️💋

custom 5316747248443345184139custom 535743897978641790851custom 519273422959467087045custom 536842900223299672315custom 540257920203149505814custom 543177367099541882114custom 53663390496719273079custom 53685235688229200006

3 Jul 2026, 16:33 UTC603 views322 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

скучаешь? 🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷🪷 ищи меня в розовых пионах, в кружевном белье, в уютных кофейнях за последним столиком, в поздней весне, в цветочном парфюме, в розовых блестках ищи меня в любви к тебе🤩

custom 5300882094518458865149custom 529900259535489390961custom 530116393456738880255custom 531674724844334518415custom 530116044275897665613custom 530116786016749811813custom 536842900223299672312custom 53685235688229200002

27 Jun 2026, 17:15 UTC581 views298 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5445128154542786944126custom 535281621199646502550custom 530115252713425175443custom 524028197428267212221custom 530088209451845886521custom 532778871600816697819custom 531674724844334518411custom 53684290022329967235

22 Jun 2026, 18:37 UTC711 views164 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 544512815454278694478custom 532778871600816697830custom 524028197428267212229custom 53008820945184588657custom 53011678601674981186custom 53167472484433451846custom 53011604427589766563custom 53684290022329967233

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @princessofkittens. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑙” (@princessofkittens), 133 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/princessofkittens.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.