Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Чёрно-белое Приморье

Channel

Чёрно-белое Приморье

@primorye_bw

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,098subscribers

-60 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001605715589
TypeChannel
Username@primorye_bw
DescriptionСтраницы истории родного края. Здесь не только про Владивосток. Воспользуйтесь поиском. Админ: @the_boatsman Использованы фото с сайта pastvu.com
Created25 September 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/primorye_bw

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,0987,1587,1286 August 2026 — 7,158 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,158 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,152 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,151 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,150 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,148 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,146 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,151 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,150 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,145 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,151 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,152 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,155 subscribers24 September 2026 — 7,151 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,137 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,135 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,127 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,119 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,116 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,112 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,107 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,101 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,103 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,098 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 95 days, net -60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,089–7,167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 14:097,098-5
3 Nov 2026, 21:067,103+2
31 Oct 2026, 23:367,101-6
29 Oct 2026, 01:187,107-5
26 Oct 2026, 01:277,112-4
23 Oct 2026, 01:577,116-3
20 Oct 2026, 06:467,119-8
14 Oct 2026, 11:197,127-8
10 Oct 2026, 12:577,135-2
4 Oct 2026, 18:207,137-14
24 Sept 2026, 21:387,151-4
16 Sept 2026, 20:187,155+3
12 Sept 2026, 19:167,152+1
8 Sept 2026, 20:557,151+6
3 Sept 2026, 09:037,145-5
31 Aug 2026, 06:557,150-1
28 Aug 2026, 16:487,151+5
25 Aug 2026, 22:457,146-2
23 Aug 2026, 06:287,148-2
20 Aug 2026, 00:557,150first reading

Engagement

107 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 7,098 subscribers
Avg views / post
778
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 107 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 45 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held107 (31 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total36,550
Reactions total784
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 04:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,440
Videos
≈329
Links
≈3,740

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 40m
Average length
9m 08s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,970 reactions across 105 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,970100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 105 of the 107 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,970 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 107 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @primorye_bw. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 107 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 47 posts held from the last 30 days (2.13%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 02:02 UTC178 views8 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Босяк на ступенях торгового дома Кунст и Альберс 1919 Автор: М.Хаскелл Источник: Д.А.Анча, В.И. Калинин, Т. З. Поздняк "Владивосток в фотографиях Мэрилла Хаскелла 1919-1920 годов". Изд-во "РИОТИП". 2009 Чёрно-белое Приморье Telegram | Max

❤8

12 Nov 2026, 21:01 UTC331 views12 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Водовоз 1919 – 1920 📍район Новоивановской, 19 Автор: М.Хаскелл Источник: Д.А.Анча, В.И. Калинин, Т. З. Поздняк "Владивосток в фотографиях Мэрилла Хаскелла 1919-1920 годов". Изд-во "РИОТИП". 2009 Чёрно-белое Приморье Telegram | Max

❤12

12 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC438 views23 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Кузница 1919 – 1920 📍район Новоивановской, 19, вид в сторону Луговой Автор: М.Хаскелл Источник: Д.А.Анча, В.И. Калинин, Т. З. Поздняк "Владивосток в фотографиях Мэрилла Хаскелла 1919-1920 годов". Изд-во "РИОТИП". 2009 Чёрно-белое Приморье Telegram | Max

❤23

12 Nov 2026, 01:59 UTC497 views9 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Владивосток - город особенный Представляем вниманию зрителя фрагмент полнометражной документальной ленты студии «Дальтелефильм» «Города и годы», посвящённой Транссибирской магистрали за 50 лет Советской власти. Владивостоку, как конечному её пункту, отведены последние 15 минут фильма. В этом выпуске – повествование о Владивостоке 1970-го года. Интересно, что авторский текст озвучен голосом звезды советского экрана О…

❤9

11 Nov 2026, 21:01 UTC659 views22 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Китайские рабочие, крутящие ворот подъемного механизма 1919 Достройка дома инженера Мешкова. Перекресток со Светланской 📍Посьетская 48 Автор: М.Хаскелл Источник: Д.А.Анча, В.И. Калинин, Т. З. Поздняк "Владивосток в фотографиях Мэрилла Хаскелла 1919-1920 годов". Изд-во "РИОТИП". 2009 Чёрно-белое Приморье Telegram | Max

❤22

11 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC815 views19 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Корейцы на железнодорожном вокзале 1919 Автор: М.Хаскелл Источник: Д.А.Анча, В.И. Калинин, Т. З. Поздняк "Владивосток в фотографиях Мэрилла Хаскелла 1919-1920 годов". Изд-во "РИОТИП". 2009 Чёрно-белое Приморье Telegram | Max

❤19

11 Nov 2026, 01:59 UTC598 viewsread 13 November 2026
File

#газета Владивосток № 36. 8 сентября 1891 Чёрно-белое Приморье Telegram | Max

10 Nov 2026, 21:01 UTC649 views23 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Отец и сын - рогульщики 1919 Автор: М.Хаскелл Источник: Д.А.Анча, В.И. Калинин, Т. З. Поздняк "Владивосток в фотографиях Мэрилла Хаскелла 1919-1920 годов". Изд-во "РИОТИП". 2009 Чёрно-белое Приморье Telegram | Max

❤23

10 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC633 views31 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Китайский фокусник-шпагоглататель 1919 На улицах города китайцы давали представления под открытым небом. Во Владивостоке было не так много развлечений для небогатых горожан. Фокусники, бродячие музыканты, акробаты собирали вокруг себя толпы зрителей. «...Китайцы необыкновенные любители всяких процессий, фокусов, музыки, уличных плясунов, акробатов. Чрезвычайно трудолюбивый, работящий, не знающий праздности, китаец н…

❤31

10 Nov 2026, 02:04 UTC671 views6 reactionsread 13 November 2026

#статья Про памятник Борцам за власть Советов на Дальнем Востоке Чёрно-белое Приморье Telegram | Max

❤6

9 Nov 2026, 21:02 UTC689 views21 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Лодки-шампуньки у городской пристани 1919 Автор: М.Хаскелл Источник: Д.А.Анча, В.И. Калинин, Т. З. Поздняк "Владивосток в фотографиях Мэрилла Хаскелла 1919-1920 годов". Изд-во "РИОТИП". 2009 Чёрно-белое Приморье Telegram | Max

❤21

Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @primorye_bw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 8 posts on @primorye_bw as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
7

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

VLNews25 l Новости Владивостока и Приморья
@vlnews25 · 48,157
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
revizor_vdk
@revizor_vdk · 20,627
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 September 2026
Владивосток Online
@Vladivostokl · 67,727
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
ПРИМОРСКИЙ РАЙ | Владивосток
@prim_ray · 25,355
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Чёрно-белое Приморье” (@primorye_bw), 7,098 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/primorye_bw.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.