PINO Buy! π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’ π 1.16 SOL ($99.74) π 119 510.188 PINO π€ 7sGPb7...7E74 | Txn β¬οΈ Position: 854% Up! πΈ Market Cap $825 981 π Chart β« Trending β³οΈ Events π£ | SOL TRENDING #4

Channel
PRIME CRYPTO CALLS πΎ
@primecryptocalls
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
288subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001956602785 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @primecryptocalls |
| Description | Creating a series of higher highs only from main positions Reach out to @mr_primeboss for details |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/primecryptocalls |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 288 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 288 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 293 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 January 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 245
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 22
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 8 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 3s
- Average length
- 3s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
272 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 85 | 31.3% | |
| π₯ | 43 | 15.8% | |
| π | 38 | 14.0% | |
| π | 31 | 11.4% | |
| β€ | 20 | 7.35% | |
| π€© | 15 | 5.51% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 11 | 4.04% | |
| π€― | 8 | 2.94% | |
| πΎ | 7 | 2.57% | |
| π | 5 | 1.84% | |
| β‘ | 3 | 1.10% | |
| πΎ | 3 | 1.10% | |
| π | 3 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 272reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2025 to 14 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Do you love $BNB real $gems! $IApe is a super lowcap gem on $bnbchain. You can't be earlier than this. CA: 0xAA091C8bd5bded850a78F1cf72d5029b19459237 Liquidity locked for 5 years nd ownership renounced We have created over 12 liquidity pools with 12 tokens and our aim is 50 tokens just to strengthen the $IAPED token liquidity. 5% on buy and sell 1% is sent to liquidity pool and brunt forever, we have burnt more β¦
π₯2β€1
OG memecoin $BERRY created last year and hyped smash highs of almost 11M maps currently at a juicy dip with CTO team bringing in Web2 and web3 together!! Been a while since we've seen a long term utility meme project with some dox leaders. https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x8192D5254284a14d85a58dEF7cef5B91Bf247cd9 Vital links preview below TG: https://t.me/StrawberryInBloom FB : https://www.facebook.com/profile.pβ¦
π₯5β€1
Shared $COM in my private at $203k sitting at $2.9M {14x} on a dip now sending to break ATH soon Chadds.
π€―8β€3π₯3π2
DM> @Mr_Primeboss for private
π10
$PRINTR shared at $56k in my private sitting at $7.2M {128x} from this position we send it back and smash ATH soon.
π₯6π€©4π3π2
DM> @Mr_Primeboss for private
π10π4π3
$PENNY shared in my private at $103k sitting at $3.3M {32x} from this point Chadds letβs go π₯βοΈ.
π9π₯3π€©3β€2
DM> @Mr_Primeboss for private
π10β€βπ₯5
Shared ($DOGEFATHER) in my private at $46k currently sitting at $3.2M {69x} from here and positioning to send higher π₯ππ.
π7π3π₯3π€©3β€2
DM> @Mr_Primeboss for private
π11
$CHLOE shared in my private at $93k sitting at $1.8M {19x} from this position now we send for reversal and higher Chadds π₯π«‘.
π8π₯4π3πΎ3π2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @primecryptocalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@primecryptocalls named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant β a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 β 9 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 13 August 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βPRIME CRYPTO CALLS πΎβ (@primecryptocalls), 288 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/primecryptocalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.