Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PRIGGISH_ENGLISH 🖇️📝

Channel

PRIGGISH_ENGLISH 🖇️📝

@priggish_english

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,776subscribers

+135 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001655581186
TypeChannel
Username@priggish_english
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/priggish_english

Growth

4,6414,7764,708.57 August 2026 — 4,641 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,645 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,689 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,711 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,717 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,714 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,713 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,723 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,758 subscribers7 September 2026 — 4,776 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 30 days, net +135. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,621–4,796 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 03:374,776+18
2 Sept 2026, 14:594,758+35
30 Aug 2026, 07:454,723+10
26 Aug 2026, 23:124,713-1
19 Aug 2026, 16:074,714-3
16 Aug 2026, 20:274,717+6
13 Aug 2026, 17:544,711+22
10 Aug 2026, 19:374,689+44
8 Aug 2026, 04:224,645+4
7 Aug 2026, 23:014,641first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.51%
avg views ÷ 4,776 subscribers
Avg views / post
407
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held23 (30 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total813
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

579 reactions across 21 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31854.9%
❤‍🔥11519.9%
🔥10418.0%
🥰183.11%
🍓162.76%
👍81.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 579 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC336 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Надагадую про наш розіграш ромкому англійською 📕✈️✨ ➡️посилання для участі 🧐

18🔥3🥰3

10 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC477 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Як запам'ятати дієслово, у якого 275 значень варіантів буде декілька 🤍Групуйте - за логікою - take off є спільна логіка - відділення, зняття take off (про літак — відірватися від землі), take off your coat (зняти), take a day off (відділити день від роботи) - за темою тут треба не лізти ЩО ЩЕ значить це фразове дієслово фокусуйтесь на одному значенні саме для певної теми 🤍Контекст Речення дає контекст, який сам

25

9 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC543 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Чому окрім фразових дієслів варто вчити їхні формальні еквіваленти ми вже тут говорили про те, що в кожного фразового дієслова є свій еквівалент формальний англійська - це мова регістрів (ну як і будь-яка), і phrasal verbs та їхні латинізовані синоніми живуть у різних СОТАХ (🐝) Find out чудово в розмові з другом, але в есе чи офіційному листі природніше discover ❗️Тому вчити треба парами: розмовний варіант + форм

❤‍🔥22🍓73

9 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC552 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

На що звертати увагу, коли вчиш фразові дієслова ні, не тільки значення чи переклад)0 1️⃣ Транзитивність Простими словами зараз скажу. Дієслово можуть не мати додатка (the plane takes off - літак взлітає) або ОБОВʼЯЗКОВО мати додаток (I took off my shoes) - зверніть увагу, що я використала те саме дієслово, але воно різне за характером вживання та перекладом 2️⃣Відокремлюваність Не знаю як назвати інакше, але зара

27🍓7

8 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC660 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Всі постійно говорять про те, що треба тренувати Speaking, бо саме він допомагає краще запамʼятовувати слова, граматику, позбуватися мовного бар’єру і т.і. Звичайно це можна робити із Gemini, але хочеться розмовляти із реальною людиною, яка буде цікавитися розмовою….😒 І це можна зробити прямо зараз всього за 1875 грн На місяць? НА РІК. Engin - це не про уроки, це не про спікінг клаби, це про комфортну щотижневу р

🔥198

7 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC574 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @cosybookishcornerPhoto

😉😉😉😉😉😉😉😉😉😉 Даруємо ромком англійською «Funny Story» Емілі Генрі 🍓🎟️🍋 Умови участі: 1️⃣Підписатися на три канали про англійську: 🌟cosy bookish corner 🌟english tea 🌟PRIGGISH_ENGLISH 2️⃣Поділитися цим постом із друзями-книголюбами 3️⃣Залишити реакції під попередніми дописами на всіх трьох каналах (нам буде дуже приємно 🤍) 4️⃣Написати свій порядковий номер у коментарях під оригінальним дописом ✨ Відправка книжки перем

❤‍🔥3812🥰4🍓2🔥2👍1

7 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC633 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

...цікава-цікава я ділюся ресурсами, де можна більше про це почитати/послухати A Brief History of Phrasal Verbs https://inglespodcast.com/2020/09/27/a-brief-history-of-phrasal-verbs-airc331/ THE DEVELOPMENT OF PHRASAL VERBS IN BRITISH AND AMERICAN ENGLISH (це наукова стаття) https://ibn.idsi.md/sites/default/files/imag_file/344-351_1.pdf

48🔥8🥰3👍2

6 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC737 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Навіщо потрібні phrasal verbs і звідки вони взялися як ви розумієте говорити ми будемо ці дні про фразові дієслова зараз буду пояснювати, це вам не сильно допоможе їх вивчити, але буде цікаво😳 Історично це спадок германських мов. Всі мови мають префікси у дієслів, але в англійській вони відділилися (як у німецькій інколи префікси переходять в кінець речення, відчуваєте?). ☕️burn up - forbærnan ( bærnan - горіти)

❤‍🔥4218🔥4

6 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC701 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💚 Читання ромкомів англійською — найкращий вибір для вивчення сучасної лексики та відпочинку водночас. Тому ми з дружніми каналами вирішили обʼєднатися та організувати для вас, любі підписники, розіграш суперпопулярного ромкому англійською. Усі деталі будуть зовсім скоро, а поки пишіть у коментарях, які ромкоми в оригіналі ви вже читали 👇

🔥4212🥰8👍1

4 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC816 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

а де взяти такі класні аудіювання та слова? ось тут😏 Спойлер - я інколи використовую цю книгу для своєї групи САЕ

39

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @priggish_english. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PRIGGISH_ENGLISH 🖇️📝” (@priggish_english), 4,776 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/priggish_english.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.