Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
9号的相册与评价
@prhwbw
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004418906192 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prhwbw |
| Description | 9号的相册与评价 |
| Created | 17 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 5 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prhwbw |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 23:22 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 17 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 27461.5%
- avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 275
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (17 September 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,570 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Oct 2026, 23:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 11
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Posted without readable text
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️(五星满分,一星差评)』 【验证人 】:( @somo_8521 ) 【日 期】:9-20 【美女昵称】:#9 【联系方式】: @behqf 【所属频道】:(公开榜/必品榜) 【地 区】:(吴中区/姑苏区等) 【上课花费】:(400p) 【口渴关怀】:(饮料/矿泉水/无) 【人照相似】:真人好看过照片 【服务内容】: 洗澡 舌吻 【服务过程】:终于来新人了今天终于来了,本来看着模卡美颜较重还在担心真人怎么样,见面一看基本就是模卡关掉瘦脸的样子,由于是头钟啥也不了解先大班开始,妹妹明显有点紧张,一问说是有一年多没上过班了,之前有短暂女仆经验。我一边安抚一边解开咪咪罩,可以啊应该有个c+,手感也不错,赶紧先升级超大,看看全身身材如何。身高165,屁股也不小,妹妹也在聊天过程中放开了情绪,一个钟快结束的时候感觉状态越来越好了,就加了一个钟,最后在妹妹大奶子中释放结束…
『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️(五星满分,一星差评)』 【验证人 】:( @somo_8521 ) 【日 期】:9-20 【美女昵称】:#9 【联系方式】: @behqf 【所属频道】:(公开榜/必品榜) 【地 区】:(吴中区/姑苏区等) 【上课花费】:(400p) 【口渴关怀】:(饮料/矿泉水/无) 【人照相似】:真人好看过照片 【服务内容】: 洗澡 舌吻 【服务过程】:终于来新人了今天终于来了,本来看着模卡美颜较重还在担心真人怎么样,见面一看基本就是模卡关掉瘦脸的样子,由于是头钟啥也不了解先大班开始,妹妹明显有点紧张,一问说是有一年多没上过班了,之前有短暂女仆经验。我一边安抚一边解开咪咪罩,可以啊应该有个c+,手感也不错,赶紧先升级超大,看看全身身材如何。身高165,屁股也不小,妹妹也在聊天过程中放开了情绪,一个钟快结束的时候感觉状态越来越好了,就加了一个钟,最后在妹妹大奶子中释放结束…
Photo, posted without a caption
『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️(五星满分,一星差评)』 【验证人 】:( @ghdhgdb) 【日 期】:9-18 【美女昵称】:#9 【联系方式】:客服: @behqf 【所属频道】:(公开榜/必品榜) 【地 区】:(相城区) 【上课花费】:(400) 【口渴关怀】:(饮料/矿泉水/无) 【人照相似】:真人好看过照片 【服务内容】:口 做 洗澡 【服务过程】:第3次来了,环境一如既往的好,这次是他们家新来的9号老师,先说说优点7号身材高挑,颜值可以,皮肤白奶子大手感好,进门服务态度很好!很热情😜,洗澡要求她帮我助浴,开始后背服务正常流程,白白的大奶子在我后面蹭来蹭去很有感觉😁,说重点我也算是经常出来玩的了阅奶无数,这个还真不赖!然后开始吸蛋舔蛋,这技术牛逼!😚,搞的我实在受不了啦,我给老师做个毒龙舔鲍鱼,😋,刚开始还有点不习惯,舔了👅一会老师呻吟着发出很诱惑的声音让我欲罢不能🥹,然后开始👅鲍鱼…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @prhwbw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“9号的相册与评价” (@prhwbw), 1 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prhwbw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.