4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 135–137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 10:18
135
-1
15 Aug 2026, 20:44
136
-1
8 Aug 2026, 23:15
137
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:18
137
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 16s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
34 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
8
23.5%
👍
6
17.6%
custom 5314360359023301663
5
14.7%
😁
5
14.7%
custom 5379895366617433878
4
11.8%
custom 5467563749437112204
4
11.8%
custom 5384221515376001384
2
5.88%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Интересное с ПМЭФМА
Для меня этот форум давно стал битвой стендов. Что-то интересненькое выдал RT. Кстати у них и OZON был очень вкусный кофе. Про проблемы, возникающие в городе на время проведения данного события, писать, думаю, не стоит.
🫠Я не фанатка мероприятия. Так же как и ажиотажа вокруг него. В прошлом году хоть лабубы смешные были. Моя новостная лента не порадовала нонсенсами.
Много обсуждали ИИ. Последне…
Вопрос знатокам: какое авто будет наименее пользоваться популярностью у участников ПМЭФ 2026?
В этом списке спряталось несколько импостеров, но я не могу этого доказать...
На ТВ каналах кризис тем? Почему освещают фейки и бред
Я думаю не надо объяснять, что это за видео.
⭐️ КЛЯНУСЬ: ВИДЕО ПОСТАНОВОЧНОЕ!!!!!!!!!
Что об этом говорит:
🐚 Аккаунт — новорег. Аккаунт с пометкой «новый». 5 видосов в инсте.
🐚 Серийность. «Часть 1», «Часть 2», подписи «Подпишись, чтобы увидеть продолжение»
🐚 Одноактовка. Всё, что есть у этого молодого человека — это одна тема. Больше он ничего не снимал. Ни к…
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @prfore1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Проделки Насти в пиар” (@prfore1), 135 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prfore1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
