9 measurements spanning 20 days, net +41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,432–4,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 19:14
4,481
+3
24 Aug 2026, 20:04
4,478
-1
20 Aug 2026, 20:18
4,479
+36
17 Aug 2026, 16:57
4,443
+5
14 Aug 2026, 19:44
4,438
-2
11 Aug 2026, 03:01
4,440
-2
8 Aug 2026, 10:58
4,442
+2
7 Aug 2026, 19:18
4,440
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:07
4,440
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.70%
avg views ÷ 4,481 subscribers
Avg views / post
345
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
8 (2 August 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
2,761
Reactions total
72
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
72 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🎉
25
34.7%
👍
21
29.2%
🔥
20
27.8%
❤
6
8.33%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
У нас в работе очередной объект, от которого отказываются все мастера 😱
🔥 Всё как мы любим: старый фонд, стены толщиной полметра, отваливавшиеся кирпичи, отсутствие геометрии, толщина пенного шва 5+ см, необходимость наращивать на 5-15см
Кажется, это уже наша фишка — превращать такие откосы в конфетку 🍬
Многие, когда видят такие откосы хватаются за голову и думают, что это невозможно исправить. В их числе была и н…
4 МИФА ОБ УТЕПЛЕНИИ ФАСАДА | 1 ЧАСТЬ 👇🏻
Друзья, пока вы задаете интересующие вопросы, мы решили разобрать ТОП самых частых мифов об утеплении фасадов
🧐 Вокруг темы внешнего утепления ходит множество мифов, возникших в силу желания продавцов некоторых технологий продать свой продукт любой ценой 💸 #фасад@prefabx
Сейчас мы непредвзято, по фактам и с точки зрения физики разберемся в таких вопросах как:
🔴Должны ли ст…
Продолжаем разбираться в утеплении фасадов 🏡 Разбираем Ваши вопросы 👇
📌 Мы знаем, что вокруг темы утепления всегда существует множество мифов, теорий, сложных вопросов, которые порождают вечные споры.
А тем, кто не является строителем по профессии — и вовсе сложно разобраться в таких сложных вопросах.
👉Приглашаем Вас задать все интересующие, сложные вопросы анонимно по этой ссылке: t.me/anonaskbot?start=md00t
Нап…
Друзья, напоминаем, что наши мастера есть во многих городах!
Если Вам нужны специалисты, которые проффесионально произведут ремонтные работы, читайте 👇
Список наших проверенных мастеров по городам:
Москва, Воронеж, Тамбов
Санкт-Петербург, Петрозаводск, Мурманск, Череповец
Ярославль, Тольятти, Екатеринбург
Сочи, Краснодар, Ростов-на-Дону, Грозный, Ставрополь, Нальчик, Черкесск
Тюмень, Новосибирск, Чита, Иркутск…
КЕЙС: Наш мастер в г. Санкт-Петербург выполнил локальный ремонт👇
Недавно к нам обратилась заказчица Елена с задачей проведения ремонта душевой по технологии Prefabx
✅ Наш специалист Артём оперативно принял заказ и выполнили работы:
— Демонтаж старой душевой и поддона
— Обшивка стен плитами Prefabx
— Установка нашего готового поддона
— Облицовка плиткой
⌛️ Срок выполнения работ: ≈3 раб.дня
🔥 Результат: обновленная…
🎉 Сегодня особенный день. День рождения основателя PrefabX.
От всей команды поздравляем Мокина Владимира Евгеньевича с Днём рождения! 🎂
Для большинства руководитель — это человек, который управляет компанией из кабинета.
Но если вы давно следите за нашим сообществом, то знаете: Владимир — человек, который лично контролирует производство, приезжает на объекты, общается с мастерами, проводит вебинары, тестирует мате…
Какую технологию утепления фасада выбрать? ЧЕСТНОЕ СРАВНЕНИЕ👇
Сегодня большинство домов утепляют по одной из двух технологий: мокрый или вентилируемый фасад.
📌 У каждой есть свои сильные стороны, но есть и нюансы, о которых редко говорят до начала строительства.
1️⃣Мокрый фасад — хорошая теплоизоляция и сравнительно доступная стоимость. Но такая система требует строгого соблюдения технологии монтажа. Любая ошибка …
Как думаете, какое утепление фасада сегодня самое надежное? 🧐 🏡
Мокрый фасад10%
Не знаю, тоже интересно30%
Вентилируемый фасад10%
Технология Prefabx37%
У меня квартира, не моя тема23%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @prefabx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как думаете, какое утепление фасада сегодня самое надежное? 🧐 🏡
Мокрый фасад10%
Не знаю, тоже интересно30%
Вентилируемый фасад10%
Технология Prefabx37%
У меня квартира, не моя тема23%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PrefabX” (@prefabx), 4,481 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prefabx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.