Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Predictūm Signals Leaks

Channel

Predictūm Signals Leaks

@predictumleaks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

34subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001536449793
TypeChannel
Username@predictumleaks
DescriptionHere We Are Providing Predictum Indicator Signals For A Much Cheaper Price Our Previous Successful Projects https://t.me/ImmortalCrypt
CreatedBetween 1 July 2021 and 26 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/predictumleaks

Growth

347 August 2026 — 34 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33–35 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 00:0234no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:4334first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 July 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 September 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
15
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

6 Sept 2021, 19:15 UTC831 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

A new gap was formed at ~50100$ FYI: ±90% of CME gaps are filled sooner or later. Keep this in mind. #BTC

23 Aug 2021, 10:01 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 11 August 2026

#THETAUSDTPERP Long opportunity. If the price reaches 7.653, you can open a position. Targets: 7.675959, 7.72953, 7.80606, 7.88259, 8.4183+ Deposit: 5−10% Leverage: 5−10x cross Once TP 2−3 hit, you can move the remainder of the position to breakeven or slightly lower than the entry point and take profit as it grows.

21 Aug 2021, 12:56 UTC881 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#CHZUSDTPERP Long opportunity. If the price reaches 0.378, you can open a position. Targets: 0.379134, 0.38178, 0.38556, 0.38934, 0.4158+ Deposit: 5−10% Leverage: 5−10x cross Once TP 2−3 hit, you can move the remainder of the position to breakeven or slightly lower than the entry point and take profit as it grows.

20 Aug 2021, 19:15 UTC537 viewsread 11 August 2026

Our money printing machine, aka Predictūm, continues to print profit 🦾 Profit on #ALICEUSDTPERP increased to +4200$ in just 1 day 😉

20 Aug 2021, 08:25 UTC515 viewsread 11 August 2026

#ALICEUSDTPERP Another day, another win 🎉 4 targets reached: 12.739103 ✓ 12.82801 ✓ 12.95502 ✓ 13.08203 ✓ Profit 40.41% 💪🏾 Cheers!

19 Aug 2021, 14:38 UTC454 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#ALICEUSDTPERP Long opportunity. If the price reaches 12.701, you can open a position. Targets: 12.739103, 12.82801, 12.95502, 13.08203, 13.9711+ Once TP 1/2/3 hit, you can move the remainder of the position to breakeven or slightly lower than the entry point and take profit as it grows.

16 Aug 2021, 08:29 UTC329 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

The gap at 47650 is filled as we predicted ☑️ We hope this information was useful for you 😉

16 Aug 2021, 02:12 UTC309 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

A new CME gap will be formed at ~47650$ FYI: ±90% of CME gaps are filled sooner or later. Keep this in mind. #BTC

9 Aug 2021, 14:12 UTC382 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

This gap is filled on the CME, as we predicted ☑️ #BTC

8 Aug 2021, 15:17 UTC325 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Also, other giant gaps are still not filled: at 49100 and at 32500. The question is which gap we will fill in earlier. #BTC

8 Aug 2021, 15:09 UTC274 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

A new CME gap will be formed at ~42600$ FYI: ±90% of CME gaps are filled sooner or later. Keep this in mind. #BTC

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @predictumleaks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Predictūm Signals Leaks” (@predictumleaks), 34 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/predictumleaks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.