Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Statistics with Alaa Koujah

Channel

Statistics with Alaa Koujah

@pre12_news

Not marked by Telegram, checked 13 August 2026

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,319subscribers

-511 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002212016091
TypeChannel
Username@pre12_news
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pre12_news

Previous handles

@pre12_news was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@pre10_news
held 6 August 20266 August 2026

Growth

5,3195,8305,574.56 August 2026 — 5,830 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,828 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,559 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,549 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,319 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -511. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,242–5,907 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 09:045,319-230
12 Aug 2026, 15:045,549-10
12 Aug 2026, 02:305,559-269
6 Aug 2026, 21:205,828-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:325,830first reading

Engagement

81 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.2%
avg views ÷ 5,319 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,550
81 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
81
of 81 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 55 of 81 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held81 (2 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total125,822
Reactions total2,194
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,194 reactions across 55 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,71478.1%
🤣29813.6%
🔥914.15%
💔673.05%
👏160.729%
👍80.365%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,194reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,310 views300 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ايييييه ما لحقنا نرتاح من بري 11 اجو بري 12🥲💔 المهم بإذن الله حيكون في فرص عمل الكن بري 11 بس تخلصوا عالقناة الجديدة لبري 12👇🏻 https://t.me/PRE12_Sy فهلأ مشاكل ولاد الخالة العمات الحيايا كذا مذا نسولنا اياهن وبعتوا الرابط لرفقاتكم او قرايبينكم او اخواتكن المقبلين عالتحضيرية..منكبر فيكم بري 11😁❤️

294🔥4👏2

10 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈2,050 views94 reactionsread 12 August 2026

باركولنا يا جماعة😁❤️ عم نعمل شراكة مع أحد المنصات العالمية حول تدريبات في مجال الذكاء الاصطناعي وبهي المناسبة بخبركم صعي انو رحلتنا مع بعض خلصت كبري 11 بعد هالسنة الطويلة بس في احتمال ينعمل شي الكن لما تصيروا سنة تانية بمختلف الأفرع الطبية بشري أسنان صيدلة..هاد الشي ما منعرف اذا بيلحق من هلأ او لما تبلشوا دوام سنة تانية وهيك بصير فينا نكون معكن لما تخلصوا تحضيرية بتلت شغلات: 🔺معدات الأسنان هاد المجال من دفعة بري 1

80🔥8👏4👍1💔1

8 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC≈2,750 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

27 ساعة فقط كانت كافية للكلام قدامكن لتجيب تمانينات بدي اختم اليوم بهالرسالة الوصلتني من شوي ❤️❤️❤️ مئات الرسائل واصلتني شي بثلج القلب والله كلو بفضل دعمكن وتشجيعكم يا أبطال❤️❤️❤️ في اشاعة عم تنتشر انو بدنا نعمل شي بخص الفيزيو..نعمللكن شي نتسلى فيه بهالاسبوع😂❤️

59💔2

8 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈3,660 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

السلم فوق صار جاهز 100% ضفت عليه (الشروحات وليس تعديلات للجواب) فيك تمشي عالصور👇🏻 https://t.me/pre12_news/3098 بخصوص الخلافيات: رقم 51 رقم 63 رقم 88 (شوي خلافي يعني يادوب) هي ولا حدة بسوريا بيعرف جوابها..بالسنين الماضية كل مين يناقش عكيفو بالآخر يوم العلامات بيطلع الله اعلم لذلك اكتفيت وقلتلك انو هاد خلافي اقرأ المناقشة لتفهم وضعك وبالنهاية الحمدلله اهم شي انو الخلافيات معدودات بسيطات جداً 🔴🔴الخلاصة: كلشي حضر معي

36💔4

8 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC≈3,310 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

لحد هلأ الاسئلة الخلافية 2-3 هي مافيه حدة يجزملك اياها بسوريا ترى..والدليل السنوات الماضية باحد الدورات وصلت الوزارة لمرحلة حذفتلا شي 4-5 اسئلة يمكن واكتر وراحت علامات الطلاب😂

17💔4

8 Aug 2026, 14:44 UTC≈3,310 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

بخصوص عدد المواليد خلال سنة السؤال 88 ترى بالواقع بيدخل بالتنين بالمواليد الخام والخصوبة العامة الجوابين صح ترى نجي للواقع طب ليش حليناه خصوبة عامة؟ هيك جرت العادة دكاترة الجامعات بسوريا هيك اعتبروه سابقا لما نسألن عن الدورات لانو سؤال مكرر دورات ترى يا جماعة

17💔5

8 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈3,320 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

بخصوص ال83 ليش اخترنا حصصية مو طبقية هلأ التنتين كمبدأ..هو تقسيم المجتمع لاقسام وبعدها اخد عينات من هالاقسام وين النقطة: لو بدو طبقية بقلك بشكل واضح اخدنا عينة عشوائية من كل قسم طيب ما حكا؟ حتى بكل النص ما جاب سيرة شي عشوائي لذلك منختار حصصية بخصوص 84 واضح عم يقلك كل عاشر اسم عشوائية منتظمة

11

8 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC≈3,200 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

بخصوص 51 ح ناقشلكن اياه بكل الجهات: بالكتاب وردت حالة قلك ان التوزيع طبيعي وكلشي بس فقط فقط فقط عندك الحجم تحت 30 فحلها ستيودنت يعني B لو جينا كتفكير الحالات تبع الانحراف مجهول والتوزيع طبيعي هي في حال الحجم فوق 30 بيتقرب للطبيعي المعياري في حال الحجم ضل تحت 30 فبضلو ستيودنت فهمتو ليش خلافي شوي السؤال ومافي حدة ترى يجزملك شو الصح خلافي يعتبر❗️

10

8 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈3,410 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

بخصوص 63 كمان مهم مشان تعرفوا شو خلافي وشو لا: علميا علميا..كلما ازداد حجم العينة n فوق 30 كلما اقتربنا من الطبيعي المعياري... طيب لو طلعنا بالكتاب بقلك ستيودنت وبس شوف السكرين فوق لو جينا علميا بقلك (يقرب تقريب) للطبيعي المعياري.. كحل الوزارة بتمشي عالكتاب لهيك حطيتو ستيودنت كونو الادق اما الطبيعي المعياري فهو التقريب وليس الأدق

9

8 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC≈3,310 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

التصويبات والتعديلات مشان ما تضيع وما ترجع لفوق: -مسألة موظف التسويق بس ضيف x=3 واحتمالها 2/8 https://t.me/pre12_news/3091 -57 تعديل فيه الZ اصغر من 4 الجواب نفسو D https://t.me/pre12_news/3093 -79 بس عدل من -2 ل -3 https://t.me/pre12_news/3095 -25 الجواب واضح متغير مستمر الطول https://t.me/pre12_news/3100 -78-79 https://t.me/pre12_news/3102 هدول كلن بإذن الله..خبروني ادش بتجيبوا👇🏻😍 @Alaa_Ko

10

8 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC≈3,160 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

شرح 79 كونو حط اشارات مساواة ممكن الطالب يتخربط ليش؟ لانو عطاك الطرفين سالبات ومنه التنين سالبات حصرا حصرا حصرا لهيك هنن اجباري تحت الصفر تماما!! لذلك شلنا المساواة يعني μ1<μ2 انتبهولها بس

🔥207

Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @pre12_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 87,730 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

التجمع الاتحادي لطلبة سورية
@syr_esu · 210,597
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Statistics with Alaa Koujah” (@pre12_news), 5,319 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pre12_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.