Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PRivaCY Coin Update Channel

Channel

PRivaCY Coin Update Channel

@prcyupdate

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,291subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001275725270
TypeChannel
Username@prcyupdate
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/prcyupdate

Growth

3,2913,3173,3046 August 2026 — 3,317 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,317 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,316 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,308 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,306 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,304 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,299 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,295 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,291 subscribers6 August 202625 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 19 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,287–3,321 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 14:433,291-4
22 Aug 2026, 23:043,295-4
19 Aug 2026, 10:283,299-5
16 Aug 2026, 18:253,304-2
13 Aug 2026, 13:273,306-2
10 Aug 2026, 23:313,308-8
7 Aug 2026, 17:263,316-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:153,317no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:063,317first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

243 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7430.5%
👍6727.6%
5121.0%
🎄166.58%
👏93.70%
❤‍🔥62.47%
🍌52.06%
💩52.06%
🥰41.65%
🍾20.823%
👎20.823%
😭10.412%
🤮10.412%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2023 to 24 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Dec 2025, 16:03 UTC369 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Dear #PRivaCY Family, On behalf of the whole PRivaCY team, Merry Christmas 🎄!

10👍5🔥2

12 Nov 2025, 20:35 UTC843 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://fxtwitter.com/prcycoin/status/1988707245664940188?s=20

🔥104👍1

12 Nov 2025, 20:34 UTC593 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚀 PRivaCY fam, big news! We've breathed new life into our PRCY/USDT pair on Dex-Trade – it was basically a ghost town ;-)) RIP to the old PRCY/BTC pair, but we've loaded up the depth for smooth trading. Dive in: https://dex-trade.com/spot/trading/PRCYUSDT?interface=classic Did the same on Nonkyc.io: https://nonkyc.io/market/PRCY_USDT Markets are LIVE and kicking – have fun trading! 🔒💰 #PRCY #PrivacyCoin

🔥102

10 Nov 2025, 09:20 UTC465 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://fxtwitter.com/prcycoin/status/1987812390977654810?s=20

15 Feb 2025, 14:26 UTC≈1,380 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📢 PRivaCY Coin Announcement 📢 It seems Xeggex was hacked last week. Luckily, all #PRivaCY $PRCY assets are still there, and we received feedback from some users that they were able to withdraw their funds. So please withdraw your coins from there. As always, don’t store coins on an exchange.

👍4

25 Dec 2024, 09:09 UTC≈1,150 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Dear #PRivaCY Family. On behalf of the whole PRivaCY team. Merry Christmas 🎄!

🎄134🍾2👍1

14 Feb 2024, 14:03 UTC≈3,370 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔒 Exciting news! After extensive work, Privacy Coin is thrilled to announce the reopening of privacydex.io! Our dedicated team has been hard at work fixing, developing, and testing to ensure a smooth experience. Plus, we've upgraded with massive dedicated servers and database clusters for top-notch performance. While we've done extensive testing, there might be occasional delays. Your feedback is crucial, so don't

🔥2111👏6👍2🥰2

27 Jan 2024, 14:07 UTC≈1,440 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

StackOfStake will shut down POS staking and masternodes operation on February 1, 2024. If you have any coin holdings on the platform, please withdraw them.

4👍4

31 Dec 2023, 23:00 UTC≈1,370 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎉 Wishing everyone a fantastic 2024! 🚀 May it be filled with good health, success, and peace. The PRivaCY Coin team is excited to continue our journey with you in the world of privacy and innovation. Here's to a prosperous and joyful year ahead! 🌐🔒 #HappyNewYear #PrivacyCoin2024

🔥16🎄3👍3👏3😭1

31 Dec 2023, 18:26 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 7 August 2026

Please all Paid TG users. boost our channel 🔥🙏 https://t.me/prcyupdate?boost

30 Dec 2023, 11:10 UTC≈1,050 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/cml_crypto/status/1741030939424112683?s=46&t=IpmI2xU29AHSz-7bR02PdQ

🔥5

27 Oct 2023, 10:20 UTC≈1,360 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Few more listings on our Privacydex.io coming the next day's / weeks. 🥳

👍12🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @prcyupdate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PRivaCY Coin Update Channel” (@prcyupdate), 3,291 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prcyupdate.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.