Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

напик и инфи

@prakinap1kinfi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

420subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002324173037
TypeChannel
Username@prakinap1kinfi
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/prakinap1kinfi

Growth

4124204167 August 2026 — 412 subscribers7 August 2026 — 415 subscribers8 August 2026 — 415 subscribers15 August 2026 — 420 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 411–421 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 03:08420+5
8 Aug 2026, 05:33415no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:14415+3
7 Aug 2026, 14:29412first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 07s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
981.8%
🔥218.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2025 to 8 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jan 2026, 11:57 UTC654 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

где инфи? просто лс нго пропало

3🔥2

30 Dec 2025, 14:43 UTC641 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @infiBOSS

📣📣📣📣📣 ФАЙТЫ В МЕТРО by nap1k and infi💀 мы с напиком в дуо,вы в сквадах,ЦЕЛЬ:ПОСАДИТЬ ХОТЯ БЫ ОДНОГО ИЗ НАС НА КУЛАК. если посадите,то приз 360 ЮЦ (скрин в коменты) В 7 КОМАНДУ НЕ ЗАХОДИТЬ,А ТО КИКНУ 3624027 1 Всем удачи)💥

1

30 Dec 2025, 14:32 UTC574 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @infiBOSS

готовьтесь щас сделаем файты метро,но кто нас с напиком посадит на кулак,тому 360 юц дарим

2 Oct 2025, 18:39 UTC747 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @infiBOSSVideo

о братик ты че тоже здесь? 😉

29 Sept 2025, 20:33 UTC231 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @infiBOSSVideo

есть типы ваще сильнее меня?

29 Sept 2025, 18:34 UTC243 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @infiBOSSPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @prakinap1kinfi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“напик и инфи” (@prakinap1kinfi), 420 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prakinap1kinfi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.