ᥴ𐔖ρρ я ᥱⳝ᥈ᥲⲏ. ᥴⲇᥱ᥈ᥲ᥈ ⲏᥲⲭ𐔤ύ ⲧᥲⲕ ɥⲧ𐔖ⳝы υⳅ-ⳅᥲ ᥴᥴы᥈ⲕυ ⲃᥴᥱ ᥲⲃⲧ𐔖ⲙᥲⲧ𐔖ⲙ ᥒ𐔖ⲇᥒυᥴыⲃᥲ᥈υᥴь. պᥲᥴ υᥴᥒρᥲⲃυ᥈, ⲙ𐔖ⲿᥱⲧᥱ ᥈υⲃᥲⲧь ⲕ𐔖ⲙ𐔤 ⲏᥲⲭ ⲏᥱ ⲏᥲⲇ𐔖. 💋
❤7💘2🔥1

Channel
@praisemazafaka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
33subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004483691577 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @praisemazafaka |
| Created | 30 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/praisemazafaka |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 33 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 29 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 29 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (30 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 778 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
12 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 75.0% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ᥴ𐔖ρρ я ᥱⳝ᥈ᥲⲏ. ᥴⲇᥱ᥈ᥲ᥈ ⲏᥲⲭ𐔤ύ ⲧᥲⲕ ɥⲧ𐔖ⳝы υⳅ-ⳅᥲ ᥴᥴы᥈ⲕυ ⲃᥴᥱ ᥲⲃⲧ𐔖ⲙᥲⲧ𐔖ⲙ ᥒ𐔖ⲇᥒυᥴыⲃᥲ᥈υᥴь. պᥲᥴ υᥴᥒρᥲⲃυ᥈, ⲙ𐔖ⲿᥱⲧᥱ ᥈υⲃᥲⲧь ⲕ𐔖ⲙ𐔤 ⲏᥲⲭ ⲏᥱ ⲏᥲⲇ𐔖. 💋
❤7💘2🔥1
𐔖ⳝыɥⲏыύ ρᥱⲏⲇᥱρ:
ⳝ𐔖᥈ᥱᥱ ᥒρ𐔖ρᥲⳝ𐔖ⲧᥲⲏⲏыύ ρᥱⲏⲇᥱρ :
ᥒρυⲙᥱρы ρᥲⳝ𐔖ⲧ (ⲕ𐔖ⲏⲕρᥱⲧⲏ𐔖 ρᥱⲏⲇᥱρυⲏ𐔏𐔖ⲃ):
ⲫ𐔖ⲏ: я ⲏᥱ ρυᥴ𐔤ю ᥴ᥈𐔖ⲿⲏыᥱ ⲫ𐔖ⲏы. ⲙ𐔖𐔏𐔤 ⲧ𐔖᥈ьⲕ𐔖 𐔖ⳝыɥⲏыύ/цⲃᥱⲧ/ᥴ ⲏᥱⳝ𐔖᥈ьɯυⲙυ ⲇᥱⲧᥲ᥈яⲙυ ᥒ𐔖 ⲿᥱ᥈ᥲⲏυю. ⳝᥱᥴᥒ᥈ᥲⲧⲏ𐔖.
ρυᥴ𐔤ю: ᥒ᥉𐔥ᥕ (+50ρ) 𐔏𐔤ρ𐔖 (+50ρ) ⲫ𐔤ρρυ ᥲⲏⲧρ𐔖 (ⲿᥱⲏպυⲏы/ⲙ𐔤ⲿɥυⲏы) ⲧⲃυⲏ/ⲫᥱⲙυⲏⲏ ⲏᥱ ρυᥴ𐔤ю: ᥒᥱⲇ𐔖ⲫυ᥈υю ⲏᥱⲕρ𐔖ⲫυ᥈υю ᥴυ᥈ьⲏ𐔤ю ⲙ𐔤ᥴⲕ𐔤᥈ᥲⲧ𐔤ρ𐔤 ᥒ𐔖ⳅᥲ/ρᥲⲕ𐔤ρᥴ: ᥒρ𐔖ᥴⲧыᥱ/ᥴ᥈𐔖ⲿⲏыᥱ(ᥴ ɥᥱⲧⲕυⲙ 𐔖ᥒυᥴᥲⲏυᥱⲙ ᥈υⳝ𐔖 ⲕᥲρⲧυⲏⲕ𐔖ύ.)
ⳅᥲⲕᥲⳅ ⲕ𐔖ⲙⲙυɯⲕυ: — ⳝ𐔖᥈ᥱᥱ 2ⲭ ᥒρᥲⲃ𐔖ⲕ +20ρ𐔤ⳝ (ᥒᥱρⲃыᥱ ⲇⲃᥱ ᥒρᥲⲃⲕυ ⳝᥱᥴᥒ᥈ᥲⲧⲏыᥱ) — ⲇᥱⲇ᥈ᥲύⲏ 1 ⲏᥱⲇᥱ᥈я — ᥒρᥱⲇ𐔖ᥒ᥈ᥲⲧᥲ: ᥒ𐔖᥈𐔖ⲃυⲏᥲ 𐔖ⲧ υⲧ𐔖𐔏𐔖ⲃ𐔖ύ ᥴ𐔤ⲙⲙы — 𐔖ᥒ᥈ᥲⲧᥲ ⲏᥲ ᥴⳝᥱρ ρ𐔤ⳝ᥈яⲙυ. ⲙ𐔖ⲿⲏ𐔖 ⳅⲃᥱⳅⲇᥲⲙυ 𐔤 ⲕ𐔖𐔏𐔖 ⲏᥱⲧ ρ𐔤ⳝ᥈ᥱύ. (ⲧᥲ ⲿᥱ ᥴ𐔤ⲙⲙᥲ) — ᥒυᥴᥲⲧь ⲃ ᥈υɥⲕ𐔤: @S3xyShu -ρᥱⲏⲇᥱρ (ᥒρ𐔖ᥴⲧ𐔖ύ/𐔖ⳝыɥⲏыύ) -𐔖ᥒυᥴᥲⲏυᥱ ⲃᥲɯᥱ𐔏𐔖 ᥒᥱρᥴ𐔖ⲏᥲⲿᥲ/ⲫ𐔖ⲧⲕᥲ -ᥒ𐔖ⳅᥲ/ρᥲⲕ𐔤ρᥴ: ᥴ᥈𐔖ⲿⲏыύ (𐔖ᥒυᥴᥲⲏυᥱ/ⲫ𐔖ⲧⲕυ) / ᥒρ𐔖ᥴⲧ𐔖ύ (ⳅᥱρⲕᥲ᥈ьⲏ𐔖ᥱ 𐔖ⲧρᥲⲿᥱⲏυᥱ/ρᥲⲕ𐔤ρᥴ ᥒᥱρᥴ𐔖ⲏᥲⲿᥲ) -ⲃыρᥲⲿᥱⲏυᥱ ᥈υцᥲ -ᥒ𐔖 ⲕ𐔤ⲇᥲ ρυᥴ𐔖ⲃᥲ
❤2
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @praisemazafaka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 290,197 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Прайс лист |” (@praisemazafaka), 33 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/praisemazafaka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.