Исследуем реальный мир через призму математики
Это канал Яндекс Образования
Мы делаем Практикум, Учебник, Лицей и другие большие проекты
Приходите учиться к нам: education.yandex.ru/
Номер регистрации 4962369782
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,679–15,682 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 11:08
15,679
-3
10 Aug 2026, 10:31
15,682
+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:56
15,681
+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:46
15,680
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 15,679 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,200
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
18 (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
37,408
Reactions total
646
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
706
Videos
62
Links
467
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
668 reactions across 17 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
237
35.5%
🔥
124
18.6%
😁
57
8.53%
❤🔥
32
4.79%
👍
30
4.49%
🏆
26
3.89%
🤓
23
3.44%
🕊
21
3.14%
🗿
21
3.14%
👾
20
2.99%
🌚
16
2.40%
👀
12
1.80%
🤔
11
1.65%
✍
8
1.20%
👏
7
1.05%
🎉
4
0.599%
👨💻
4
0.599%
🙈
4
0.599%
🤯
4
0.599%
🥰
3
0.449%
3 further kinds
4
0.599%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 668reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Удерживаем ваше внимание, как можем, чтобы ответить на вчерашний вопрос и закрыть тему No Free Lunch...
⚡️Если теорема говорит, что универсального алгоритма не существует, почему современные нейросети всё чаще выглядят универсальными
Здесь стоит сделать важную оговорку. Сама теорема No Free Lunch требует усреднения по всем мыслимым задачам, взятым с равной вероятностью. Но что такое «случайно выбранная из всех возм…
Почему нейросеть, которая распознаёт картинки, может провалиться на другой задаче? Вчера мы уже приблизились к догадке — всему виной опять математика. А точнее...
Теория сложности вычислений 👀
Это неожиданный сосед теоремы No Free Lunch. Возможно, вы слышали о проблеме равенства классов P и NP — одной из семи проблем тысячелетия. Она посвящена времени и памяти, которые требуются для решения вычислительных задач. Кс…
Теорема, обесценивающая ИИ…
или нет? 👀
В математике есть теоремы, названия которых могут показаться шуткой: теорема о четырёх красках, теорема о причёсывании ежа, теорема о бесконечных обезьянах. К их числу относится и No Free Lunch Theorem — в буквальном переводе «бесплатных ланчей не бывает», а в более литературном — «бесплатный сыр бывает только в мышеловке».
⠀
За этим названием скрывается результат современной т…
Что почитать, если любите
математику? 📚
Собрали на Яндекс Книгах
подборку с задачами,
головоломками и полезными
приёмами критического
мышления. Здесь есть и
классика отечественного
научпопа, и современные
разборы того, как цифры
помогают манипулировать
людьми.
*️⃣Для любителей задачек:
🎨🎨🎨«Загадки и диковинки
🎨🎨🎨в мире чисел»
🎨🎨🎨Яков Перельман
Классика отечественного
научпопа — Перельман сто с
лишним лет назад ст…
Готовим для вас новую подборку книг на математике! Сегодняшнюю задачку взяли прямо оттуда. Кто догадается, что за книга?
⠀
📏 Условие
Круг можно разделить на семь частей с помощью трёх прямых линий.
⠀
❓Вопрос
Какое максимальное количество частей можно получить при делении круга с помощью семи прямых линий?
Решайте и показывайте результаты в комментариях под спойлером. А если справились, то вот ещё парочка несложны…
Рады видеть ваши ответы! Догадываемся, что наши музыкальные вкусы совпадают.
⠀
Решение вчерашней задачи:
▶️Найдём объём улучшенного нейросетью трека с голосом
количество каналов 2
время звучания 202 с
частота 48000 * 3 = 144000
битовая глубина 16 * 2 = 32 бита.
Всего: 2 * 202 * 144000 * 32 / 8 = 232704000 байт
Теперь добавим ещё столько же — это музыкальная дорожка. Итого на сам трек отводится
232704000 * 2 = 465…
У нас тут на днях планируется очень музыкальная задача...
В качестве разминки предлагаем «послушать» функции, которые используют мастера по сборке автомобильных сигнализаций 👀
НАВИГАТОР ПО КАНАЛУ 🔍
Друзья, решили обновить карту канала и познакомиться с теми, кто присоединился к нам недавно. Здесь мы исследуем реальный мир через призму нашей любимой науки: решаем задачи, вспоминаем великих учёных, говорим об ИИ, искусстве, играх и программировании.
Те, кто недавно вступил, не стесняйтесь задавать вопросы и делиться мыслями в комментариях к постам и нашем чатике. Первые материалы к прочтен…
❤35🤓7👾3👀2🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @practicum_math. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 398,857 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Зачем мне эта математика” (@practicum_math), 15,679 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/practicum_math.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.