Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Practical PM

Channel

The Practical PM

@practicalpm

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

577subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001458388177
TypeChannel
Username@practicalpm
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/practicalpm

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

576581578.57 August 2026 — 581 subscribers8 August 2026 — 581 subscribers16 August 2026 — 579 subscribers24 August 2026 — 577 subscribers9 September 2026 — 576 subscribers17 September 2026 — 581 subscribers2 October 2026 — 577 subscribers5777 August 20262 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 55 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 575–582 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Oct 2026, 09:59577-4
17 Sept 2026, 12:00581+5
9 Sept 2026, 05:17576-1
24 Aug 2026, 23:04577-2
16 Aug 2026, 14:33579-2
8 Aug 2026, 03:20581no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:04581first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 November 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 00m
Average length
17m 16s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍787.5%
❤112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2021 to 24 November 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Nov 2022, 16:40 UTC≈1,400 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

New episode of Barebones for the Practical PMs series. Episode 13 - Personas and Segments What exactly is user persona and how important is it? Does every product discussion need to start with personas? When does it help, when does it not? Is there a difference between personas and segmentation? How to do segmentation or create personas? Find out in this episode.

👍2

Signed Jaya Jha

6 Oct 2022, 13:47 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

New Episode of Barebones for the Practical PMs series. Episode 12 - Estimation Product managers are supposed to follow the evidence. But the evidence is not always in existing data. You have to make estimates of what would happen to take decisions and prioritize initiatives. In this episode, we go over some examples and principles of estimation for product managers. Also, link for my book referenced in the video …

Signed Jaya Jha

27 Jul 2022, 18:55 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

New episode of Barebones for the Practical PMs series. Episode 11 - Evidence-based Decision Making Evidence-based decision making is so important for good product management that it needs to become your second nature. However, looking for evidence is not our natural instinct. We tend to guess, and guess with overconfidence. It's natural. But it is important to not stop at guessing and consciously look for and follo…

Signed Jaya Jha

16 Jul 2022, 08:41 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

If there was one thing to take away from the episode it is

  1. Use of RICE framework42%
  2. Bucketize, then prioritize33%
  3. Stakeholder communication is important25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Jaya Jha

16 Jul 2022, 08:39 UTC935 viewsread 8 August 2026

Quiz/Survey (attempt after watching please 😊)

Signed Jaya Jha

16 Jul 2022, 08:36 UTC962 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Fresh out of oven 😊 Prioritization - Episode 10 of Barebones for the Practical PMs series. Ruthless prioritization is a product manager's destiny. If you don't have the tools to do it right, your life will be very difficult with multiple stakeholders breathing down your neck. It's not enough to apply RICE framework. Why is prioritization required, what are the challenges, and how to do it right. Find out!

❤1

Signed Jaya Jha

5 Jul 2022, 11:12 UTC896 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Do any of your organizations use Azure for Data Warehousing? I would like to learn what stack is used and how has the experience been.

Signed Jaya Jha

13 Jun 2022, 06:09 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 8 August 2026

We at TranZact are looking for enthusiastic product and tech folks to join us in our mission to digitise every Indian SMEs. We are a lean team of 25+ people and want to create a world class SAAS from India. From Day 1 itself you will be given a high ownership work which will directly contribute in the mission. If you are interested in joining the rocketship 🚀, send your resume to [email protected]. Vacancies a…

Signed Jaya Jha

13 Jun 2022, 06:09 UTC917 viewsread 8 August 2026

My ex-colleague Raja is hiring for product across different levels (product analysts, PMs, SPMs). Details below. You can send your resume to him if interested.

Signed Jaya Jha

11 Jun 2022, 12:02 UTC877 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

For people who have just joined and were not aware of the videos, everything is available on our YouTube channel. I recommend starting with The Practical PM series and go episode by episode. Here are the links The Practical PM series - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN5R9MRpoMA&list=PL-f-S_SqQPotHybn9ikTG6EoqzPWg8nOj Barebones for the Practical PMs series - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KsY1Ak3NYY&list=PL-f-S_Sq…

👍3

Signed Jaya Jha

11 Jun 2022, 05:17 UTC733 viewsread 8 August 2026

Practice Question What is the universal, ultimate product management framework?

Signed Jaya Jha

10 Jun 2022, 18:51 UTC756 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Just in! Episode 9 of Barebones for the Practical PMs series on Frameworks. In certain quarters, frameworks have become synonymous with structured thinking and product management interview preparations! What are the frameworks useful for? And how to avoid their misuse or overuse? Find out in this episode.

👍1

Signed Jaya Jha

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @practicalpm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2022, 08:41 UTCAnonymous Quiz12 voters

If there was one thing to take away from the episode it is

  1. Use of RICE framework42%
  2. Bucketize, then prioritize33%
  3. Stakeholder communication is important25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2021 to 24 November 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Practical PM” (@practicalpm), 577 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/practicalpm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.