Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 96 days, net -454. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,520–10,110 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 03:06
9,588
-7
7 Nov 2026, 02:16
9,595
-10
3 Nov 2026, 16:48
9,605
-9
31 Oct 2026, 23:09
9,614
-41
28 Oct 2026, 19:11
9,655
-49
25 Oct 2026, 23:09
9,704
-23
22 Oct 2026, 21:26
9,727
-15
19 Oct 2026, 17:29
9,742
-15
17 Oct 2026, 03:31
9,757
-20
13 Oct 2026, 21:08
9,777
-8
8 Oct 2026, 05:16
9,785
+11
1 Oct 2026, 11:58
9,774
-83
16 Sept 2026, 08:21
9,857
-16
12 Sept 2026, 09:40
9,873
+11
8 Sept 2026, 15:19
9,862
-25
3 Sept 2026, 13:38
9,887
-25
31 Aug 2026, 02:46
9,912
-19
28 Aug 2026, 10:56
9,931
-13
25 Aug 2026, 02:22
9,944
-9
22 Aug 2026, 00:37
9,953
first reading
Engagement
321 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.0%
avg views ÷ 9,588 subscribers
Avg views / post
960
149 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.944%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
149
of 321 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 45 of 149 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held
321 (31 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total
143,062
Reactions total
494
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Nov 2026, 00:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
254
Videos
113
Links
115
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3m 16s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,145 reactions across 119 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💔
318
27.8%
💘
273
23.8%
🍓
221
19.3%
🌚
58
5.07%
💋
51
4.45%
😭
50
4.37%
👀
48
4.19%
🦄
48
4.19%
💅
43
3.76%
🤓
17
1.48%
🐳
11
0.961%
☃
6
0.524%
🍌
1
0.087%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 122 of the 321 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,145 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 321 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 149 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
سلام دوستان امیدوارم حال دلتون همیشه خوب باشه 🤍
الان که بحث کمک کردن شد لطفاً به برفی هم کمک کنید، دچار التهاب و تورم شدید چشمه و اگه به زودی پول عملش جور نشه این بچه برای همیشه بیناییشو از دست میده و دیگه نمیتونه ببینه!
لطفاً تو این روزهای سخت که هزینه ها به شدت بالاست پشت این زبون بسته ها باشیم و محبتمون رو ازشون غافل نکنیم.
علاوه بر چشم برفی، پاشم حسابی با شیشه خورده پاره شده و عفونت کرده که نیاز به عمل و درمان ف…
سلام عزیزم من یه بچه گربه ۳ ماهه پیدا کردم دیدم گربه های دیگه ریختن سرش دارن میزننش رفتم اونارو ازش دور کنم که دیدم داره پاهاشو رو زمین میکشه و نمیتونه راه بره ، رفتم دامپزشکی گفتن پاهاش شکسته و باید گچ بگیره که هزینه عملش ۲۰ تومن میشه ، تازه هزینه گرافش و غذاش شد نزدیک ۳ تومن
من واقعا توان پرداخت کامل هزینه عملشو ندارم و دکتر گفت حتما زودتر باید عمل بشه چون خیلی کوچولوعه عفونتش زود پیشرفت میکنه و یا کلا فلج میشه یا …
سردرد، معده درد و مشکلهای دیگهام بخاطر حرفهاییه که ریختم تو خودم، حرفهایی که باید فحش میشدن تو روی یه سری آدم که سرم درد نگیره، تهوعی که باید خالی میشد تو روی یه تعداد که معده درد نشه، قلبی که یه تعداد شکستنش و تهش گفتن تو چقدر کم ظرفیتی.
Showing the 12 most recent of 321 posts we hold for @praaisel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 14 posts on @praaisel as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
5 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Sickliy @Sickliy · 25,940 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 5 September 2026
𝐆𝐙𝐋𝐋𝐀𝐌 @gzllammm · 43,231 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 24 September 2026
stupidlife. @sttupidlife · 22,543 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 19 September 2026
فال آینده🔮 @fallaindehh · 31,603 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 4 September 2026
-𝘊𝘶𝘵𝘦 𝘎𝘪𝘳𝘭𝘺🧁💕๑° @cuteeam · 18,567 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 2 October 2026
Opps. @Oopsmoods · 19,728 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 30 September 2026
Retroville @Sweetsoulw · 28,487 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 8 September 2026
Sun @sunmtji · 32,516 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 7 September 2026
NINI @neeg1nn · 107,668 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 4 October 2026
Mhsenivx @mhsenivxx · 250,620 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 3 September 2026
مآهِتاریک🕊 @HeartDebt · 52,547 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 1 September 2026
• اَفسون @afson_tel · 33,621 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 26 August 2026
Mehrnvzz @mehrnvzzz · 29,916 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 2 September 2026
سوگی @soogowu · 102,067 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 17 August 2026
𝐒𝐄𝐓𝐀𝐘𝐄𝐒𝐇🍸 @setayeshhwj · 159,113 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 25 August 2026
FATI @fatitajikam · 88,825 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 21 August 2026
69 @Hnule · 51,767 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 19 August 2026
💗 رمانهای نایاب💗 @Romannabbbbbb · 21,414 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 23 September 2026
ابر @urcloudi2222 · 78,746 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 20 August 2026
6 ژانویه @January0_6 · 28,461 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 17 September 2026
" کانال رسمی استاد کاظم قادری " @kazemghaderioriginal · 31,689 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 8 September 2026
پینترست ؛ @Pinteresties · 38,666 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 4 September 2026
STAYSH🪞🕯️ @staw999 · 47,119 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 26 August 2026
Serotonin 🖤 @llfreak · 226,548 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Moon’s Whisper” (@praaisel), 9,588 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/praaisel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.