این فیومه
Signed 𝖧𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗒

Channel
@pppersian_Iran
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,961subscribers
-67 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003034718975 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pppersian_Iran |
| Created | 11 February 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pppersian_Iran |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 1,961 | -25 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 1,986 | -39 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:10 | 2,025 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 2,028 | first reading |
43 posts held, back to 11 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (11 February 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 23,049 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pppersian_Iran. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 February 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
این فیومه
Signed 𝖧𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗒
ممسمسمسم من الان چی بگم به تو من مگه نگفته بودم عاشق تو و پکاتم عه. کلا نکته مثبتی من چی بگم الان
Signed 𝖧𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗒
پک های کاربردی بعد من عاشق این چنلا و اونر های باسلیقم که این وایب چنلو حفظ میکنن بابا خیلی پکات با کیفیت و اسلین وا
Signed 𝖧𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗒
خلاق، با سلیقه، و تیستت تو اهنگ و اینکه رفتی دنبال ریشهی آهنگ و درموردش پست ساختی واقعا کار جالبی بوده حداقل همه میدونن به چه آهنگی گوش میدن واقعا عاشقت شدم
Signed 𝖧𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗒
اوف بابا اوف من خیلی عاشق چنلت شدم مخصوصا اون جملهی بیوی چنلت جوری بهم انگیزه داد که برم پست درست کنم خیلی خوبه که به فکر تاریخ و فکت های ایرانی عاشقت شدم
Signed 𝖧𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗒
کاملا جدی برو نویسنده شو داری حیف میشی و اینکه وایب چنلو همینجوری نگه داشتی خیلی خوب و مرتبه همینجوری ادامه بده اسلی
Signed 𝖧𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗒
وایسا عاشق وایب چنلتو و سلیقه موسیقیت شدم و کاورت؟ گرل؟ یعنی چی چقد خوشگلن خیلی با سلیقه ای
Signed 𝖧𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗒
(باهم شوخی داریم)
Signed 𝖧𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗒
نوپ نیازی نبود اسکرول کنم به نظر من همین چنلتو عوض کن فحش یاد بده به مردم بابا بقیش سوسول بازیه بیشتر فحش بده لطفا
Signed 𝖧𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗒
پکت کاربردی بود خیلی لطفا بیشتر تر تر پک بزن نمیدونم چجوری بگم که چنلت به دلم نشست و حس خوبی داد
Signed 𝖧𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗒
من خیلی چیزمیزایی که مینویسی رو دوست دارم خیلی خوشگلن پستات و یه وایب خاصی داری چنلت انگار خونست
Signed 𝖧𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗒
Girl you are obsessed with Korea ولی جدی خیلی بامزست که انقد چیز میز میدونی درمورد کیدراما و اینا
Signed 𝖧𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗒
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @pppersian_Iran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 87,899 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ زبــانِ پــارســی ” (@pppersian_Iran), 1,961 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pppersian_Iran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.