Channel
@pppdddfffdongchen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,586subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003643288845 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pppdddfffdongchen |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pppdddfffdongchen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 1,586 | +7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 1,579 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 1,575 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 1,575 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (28 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,354 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌈 Chill Club·海珠 东成 🎫 参与条件: 加入-Invictus Gamer Chill俱乐部 加入-Invictus Gamer Chill 抽奖 加入-IGC 商家收录榜 加入-广州东成互助交流群 加入-广州东成打工总汇频道 需消耗里程币: 20 🎁 奖品内容 口令红包50🧧x1 Chill Club·东成 -30优惠劵x30 🍀 祈愿加持 ⤷每祈愿一次 +1 个抽奖号,消耗15里程币 ⤷最多祈愿 30次 ⤷诡运值祈愿: 支持 💡 抽奖说明 ① 中奖联系 @whatcanisaym 红包联系 @InvictusGamerMMK_Bot ② 使用期限：7天 ③ 劵转让需联系客服 ④ 交易商品请通过奖品上架 ⑤ 需提供报告备注“使用谁劵” ⏰ 开奖日期 2026-08-09 00:00:00
😍😍今日首推😍😍——超S牌90000 简介：168cm 瘦底大波 细长腿配E级大波 热情小御姐 服务极佳流程足 参考cd567 可送👄 参考报告： #报告1 #报告2 #报告3 #报告4 #报告5 预约咨询： @whatcanisaym @dcaj888
❤1
❤️❤️今日推荐——10010❤️❤️ 狼友反馈：Dc联通大王，走廊侧颜100昏，迷倒万千ly寻号，高颜值00后苗条且滑嫩！手法极佳 可送👄 颜控服务控必打卡 参考报告： #报告1 #报告2 #报告3 #报告4 #报告5 #报告6 #报告7 #报告8 #报告10 #报告11 #报告12 #报告13 #报告14 #报告15 #报告16 #报告17 #报告18 预约咨询： @dcaj888 @whatcanisaym （预约私信可获取视频）
【会所名称】：DC 【会所位置】：爱齿尔 【联系方式】：q @whatcanisaym 【会所价格】：560 【技师号码】：00007 【验证留名】：柒月叁拾叁日忆最后一舞 【验证时间】：8月 【颜值身材评价】：颜值人上人与npc之间，挺嫩的颜，美中不足身材比较npc 【推荐理由】：一进门小妹已经在等候，未开始前先坐下猛猛盯帧（冇带老花镜需要仔细辨别）几乎和动姐同款的短发（我感觉再剪短一丝丝更加完美）小小的脸。随即开始普通的罚企，服务很青涩，但是上来就是超长时间各种姿势的👅👅，持续攻势下，我略感疲倦（没办法刷新大，但是没先开秘法）便要求开展下一个招式轮回。小妹随即用湿纸巾开始清洁。搓小手期待开good了，谁知道又是先上一轮舌尖游龙，此时开始失望，难道上岗培训有缺失🤡结果随即开始goooooood，持续时间超级超级久，第一次在dc体验到那么长时间的。随后转换企位，gooood的同时伴随11再加之眼神诱惑。ooook，此时的我蓝量还…
❤2
明天新人重磅来袭！DC牌00000，颜值冷白皮06年嫩妹+身材苗条线条明显 上班时间12:00-21:00 前排有报告位！颜狗颜控不可错过 预约咨询： @whatcanisaym
广州探雷群出击报告（@gztlgroup） 【会所名称】：dc 【会所位置】：爱齿尔 【联系方式】：@whatcanisaym 【会所价格】: 560 【技师号码】: 18888 【验证留名】: 仙尊 【验证时间】:8.2 【颜值评价】:脸比较小，长得还行 【身材评价】：胸b,身材不错 【推荐理由】：进门就站墙边罚站，先正面各种摩擦，接着背对我，模拟后入一会，转移战场到床上，a面按摩一会，就骑在我身上yyc，不一会喝水开good，good了受不了就停，接着给我按摩，隔一会继续以上流程，最后手打出水结束。 温馨提示：报告仅供参考 (不要写出水细节） 报告请提交私信：@chenbuXZS_bot
今日上新！超S牌 00007 服务之星✌️00年靓妹 17:00-2:00 可送good☁️！前排出售报告位！
❤1
⚽️⚽️今日首发😍😍——超S牌00003 简介：166cm B+酥🐻高挑魅魔系颜值御姐 🐍吻好手 服务极佳 尺度开放 good到☁️ 🐍控颜控苗条控无脑冲！ 参考报告： #报告1 #报告2 #报告3 #报告4 #报告5 预约咨询： @whatcanisaym @dcaj888
【会所名称】: dc 【会所位置】：江燕路 【联系方式】：qaq @whatcanisaym 【会所价格】: 560*n 【技师号码】: 00003 【验证留名】: 神秘人 【验证时间】: 7.27 【颜值评价】: 9 【身材评价】: 9 【推荐理由】：人照九成我还能说什么呢 时隔很久，想再去一次dc，就问q生有没有高手，“不用看报告，直接03”，OK，信他一手，不满意直接抽称他，可惜抽称失败，因为……真的很满意！！！ 早早来到dc，洗完澡坐在熟悉的js房前，几分钟后一个瘦高美女拿着水杯进去按摩房，真的漂亮，有种预感就是03。2分钟后被阿锦带过去，嗯，就是03！！！03给我一种异域风情的感觉，香水味也很像新疆那边的😍😍 进门后直接被推到墙上不给动，好家伙，dc现在是这么玩的吗，OK，那就乖乖不动，被狂亲狂嗦几分钟，等我回过神来，卧槽，衣服裤子全被脱了！！！ …
【会所名称】：DC 【会所位置】：海珠 【联系方式】：@whatcanisaym 【会所价格】：560 【技师号码】：00003 【验证留名】：哥布林工兵 【验证时间】：7月 【颜值身材评价】：颜值个人觉得可以给到一个顶级，模卡是真人图，人照8-9成，湖南妹子，🐻A-B左右，皮肤保养的比较好很滑 【推荐理由】：今次终于来到一个冷气足的房间，入房顿时舒服晒，人跟模卡介绍差不多高挑魅魔系颜值御姐，罚站环节攻势很猛，展示魅魔的实力仿佛要把你吃掉一样，转移阵地到床上，a面自上而下，重点攻击三角区，而后顺势让佢变换69形态，不知道是我濑的太猛还是血条有问题，感觉大部分时间在0011，没有前面高手说的那种good到☁的感觉，背后有符文，一看姐姐也是高手，在一顿濑之后中场休息，闲聊了一会之后开始手打柠檬茶环节，整体体验不错，在姐姐面前，我仿佛跟新兵蛋子一样。 总结：cd666+good，模卡是真图，喜欢这种类型的可以冲。
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @pppdddfffdongchen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,162,359 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“广州东成打工总汇频道” (@pppdddfffdongchen), 1,586 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pppdddfffdongchen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.