Channel
@ppp_uzb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,621subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001381233447 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ppp_uzb |
| Created | 18 December 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ppp_uzb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 1,621 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:20 | 1,618 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 1,619 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,690 |
| Reactions total | 113 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
113 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 71 | 62.8% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 22.1% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 7.96% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 4.42% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 2.65% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Гимнастика для ума: строим финмодель Иногда делаем такую гимнастику, чтобы не расслабляться. Не терять форму, скажем. Берём проект, по которому в открытом доступе есть цифры. Собираем финмодель. Потом крутим чувствительность и смотрим, что ломается первым. Обычно делаем раз в месяц. В этом месяце платный обход Узгена. Первая платная дорога в истории Кыргызстана и первый дорожный проект страны по модели ГЧП. Откр…
🔥4👍1
Опять про частную инициативу в ГЧП Приходит спонсор - частный инициатор с готовой презентацией. И даже иногда с финмоделью. Внутренняя норма доходности — IRR — посчитана, структура капитала собрана, чувствительность к тарифу есть. Красиво. А через сорок минут разговор в кабинете чиновника заканчивается. И спонсор выходит с ощущением, что его не поняли. На самом деле он просто отвечал не на те вопросы. Инвестор и…
👍5🔥2👏1🤔1
Эксклюзивность: обязательство государства не развивать проекты, конкурирующие с ГЧП Когда считают фискальные риски ГЧП, смотрят на платежи за доступность, субсидии, гарантии минимального дохода, компенсации при расторжении. Всё это в договоре видно и хотя бы теоретически считается. А есть условие, которое описывается в соглашении о ГЧП и стоит очень дорого при его нарушении. Речь идёт об обязательстве государства н…
👍6❤2
Переговоры с китайской стороной На гарвардской программе по переговорам и медиации нам отдельно разбирали переговоры с китайской стороной. Я тогда еще подумал: ну зачем, все же понятно – культура, вежливость, чай. Оказалось, не про чай совсем. Первое, что там объясняют – про численность Когда против ваших троих садится двенадцать человек, это не понты. Это mianzi, «лицо»: приехать вдвоем на важный проект – значит …
🔥8👍2❤1
Инвестор просил у государства не денег, а трафика Кения отклонила частную инициативу американской Everstrong Capital – построить новую платную трассу Найроби–Момбаса за $3,6 млрд. Инвестор оспорил отказ в профильном комитете и в апреле проиграл. Государство запустило проект заново и в другом виде: расширять до 4 полос существующую дорогу, а не строить новую. Тендер на консультанта уже объявлен, заявки собраны, ид…
👍5❤2
Graduate Programme 2026 — Applications Now Open! Finasia Capital and Infrasia Capital are inviting high-potential graduates from the Classes of 2025 /2026 and others to join our Graduate Programme in Tashkent. Gain hands-on experience in corporate finance, infrastructure advisory and management consulting while working on high-impact projects alongside experienced professionals. 📍 Tashkent 📅 Application deadline: 1 …
👍2👏2❤1
Вакансия. Прям хорошая такая вакансия Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) Expert The Public Facilities Agency – Dubai Municipality is looking for an experienced Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) Expert to join their Investment & Commercial team and help shape the future of Dubai’s public assets, destinations, and infrastructure. If you’re looking to work on strategic, high-impact projects alongside government leader…
👍4
[O'Z] 🤝 Toshkentda Osiyo taraqqiyot banki ko‘magida davlat-xususiy sheriklik loyihalarini tayyorlash va amalga oshirish bo‘yicha o‘quv dasturining ikkinchi bosqichi boshlandi. 💻 Dastlab ishtirokchilar onlayn platformadagi o‘quv materiallarini mustaqil ravishda o‘rgandilar. 28-iyuldan 1-avgustgacha esa ular akkreditatsiyadan o‘tgan trenerlar bilan mashg‘ulotlarda qatnashadilar. 📚 Dasturda O‘zbekiston davlat tashkilo…
👏2👍1
785 млн долларов внешнего займа — на содержание и средний ремонт дорог. 13 июля MIGA выпустила гарантии в пользу Standard Chartered, J.P. Morgan и Commerzbank под заём Банку развития Казахстана. Средства уйдут в КазАвтоЖол — на содержание и средний ремонт около 7 700 км сети, включая участки коридора «Север – Юг» и Транскаспийского маршрута. Часть программы на 2 млрд долларов, где есть ещё 200 млн евро от EIB. Для…
👍2
€45,5 млн, два недостроенных госпиталя и арбитраж ICC. В последнее время много говорят про инфраструктурные проекты, которые реализуются за так называемое "связанное" кредитование. Вот вам кейс. Австрийская VAMED Engineering объявила, что идёт в суд ICC против правительства Гайаны. Требование – €45,53 млн, из них не менее €19,5 млн по уже выставленным Interim Payment Certificates, остальное – variations, индексаци…
👍2
Две ноги электростанции На прошлой неделе американская Glenfarne Group подала иск против Колумбии в ICSID – арбитраж Всемирного банка по инвестиционным спорам. Сумма пока не раскрыта. Предмет спора – не изъятие активов и не расторжение контракта, а решения государства на рынке газа. Разбирали как пример при структурировании одной сделки. Решили, что вам тоже будет интересно. Что за инвестор и что за активы Glenfar…
👍5
Деньги для инфраструктуры бывают короткие и длинные. Их нельзя путать. В свежем отчёте есть цифра: частные кредитные фонды на развивающихся рынках дают деньги в среднем на 2,5 года под 16% годовых. В США – на 4 года под 10%. При этом четверть всех таких денег идёт в инфраструктуру: аэропорт в Мумбаи, платная дорога в Колумбии, трубопровод в Аргентине. Как так – короткие деньги в проекты, которые живут по тридцать л…
👍4🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ppp_uzb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,116,025 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Просто о ГЧП” (@ppp_uzb), 1,621 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ppp_uzb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.